#6
of 368 wide receivers · Top 1%
What the numbers say about Charlie
- •Ranks #6 of 368 wide receivers in points added per game (+2.96).
- •Top 6% of wide receivers in points added per target (+0.92).
- •Cooling off: +0.46 points per play over his last three games, down from +1.16 for the season.
What people are saying about Charlie
Updated Oct 23- •ESPN describes Charlie Becker's rise from a hardworking reputation to standing as one of Indiana's standout players this season. ESPN ↗
- •The Athletic traces how Becker went from a three-star recruit to becoming coach Curt Cignetti's go-to target on offense. The New York Times ↗
- •Hoosier Huddle writes that Becker keeps pushing for more even though he is now near the top of college football. Hoosier Huddle ↗
Summaries of recent news coverage in our own words. Tap a source to read the original.
Against every FBS WR
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per target0.92Top 6%
- Target success rate55.4%Top 26%
- Catch rate63.1%Bottom 49%
- Yards per target11.1Top 10%
- Average depth of target13.8Top 8%
- Yards after catch5.1Top 45%
- Target share34.4%Top 1%
What he does best
- Target share (Top 1%)
- EPA per target (Top 6%)
- Average depth of target (Top 8%)
What to work on
- Catch rate (Bottom 49%, his lowest mark)
- Yards after catch (Top 45%, his lowest mark)
- Standard downs (+0.52 per play, vs +1.36 passing downs)
No true weak spots at his position, so these are his lowest marks.
Coaching notes
- Standard vs passing downs. Best: passing downs (+1.36 per play). Toughest: standard downs (+0.52).
- Against top defenses. Best: vs everyone else (+1.23 per play). Toughest: vs top-40 defenses (+0.60).
- By down. Best: 3rd/4th down (+1.12 per play). Toughest: 1st down (+0.73).
Share this graphicPreview ↗His scouting card as an Instagram-ready image
Players like Becker
The closest matches at his position across every stat, not just the total.
- 86%match
+2.27 points added per game
Compare to Becker - 77%match
+3.81 points added per game
Compare to Becker - 76%match
+1.58 points added per game
Compare to Becker
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 1st down+0.73 EPA · 59% succ · 27 plays
- 3rd/4th down+1.12 EPA · 50% succ · 20 plays
- 2nd down+0.98 EPA · 56% succ · 18 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Standard downs+0.52 EPA · 50% succ · 34 plays
- Passing downs+1.36 EPA · 61% succ · 31 plays
Red zone
- Red zone+0.88 EPA · 38% succ · 8 plays
Against top defenses
- vs everyone else+1.23 EPA · 70% succ · 33 plays
- vs top-40 defenses+0.60 EPA · 41% succ · 32 plays
Short vs deep
- Short targets+0.93 EPA · 60% succ · 47 plays
- Deep targets+0.89 EPA · 44% succ · 18 plays
Season stats
| Tgt | Rec | Catch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Rec TD | aDOT | YAC | Tgt Shr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | 41 | 63.1% | 723 | 11.1 | 7 | 13.8 | 5.1 | 34.4% |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Receiving | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs North Texas | 4/5, 64 yds, 2 TD | +1.42 |
| 2 | vsHoward | 3/3, 81 yds, 3 TD | +3.44 |
| 3 | vs Western Kentucky | 5/6, 127 yds, 1 TD | +1.49 |
| 4 | vs Northwestern | 7/11, 98 yds, 0 TD | +0.56 |
| 5 | at Rutgers | 7/8, 104 yds, 1 TD | +1.00 |
| 6 | at Nebraska | 3/7, 52 yds, 0 TD | +0.28 |
| 7 | vs Ohio State | 9/18, 165 yds, 0 TD | +0.88 |
| 8 | at Michigan | 3/7, 32 yds, 0 TD | +0.23 |