#23
of 160 quarterbacks · Top 14%
+5.53
points added per game vs an average QB
What the numbers say about CJ
- •Best among 103 qualified quarterbacks against top-40 defenses (+0.65 points per play).
- •Top 11% of quarterbacks in points added per dropback (+0.41).
- •Ranks #23 of 160 quarterbacks (top 14%) with +5.53 points added per game.
What people are saying about CJ
Updated Oct 24- •Bailey earned Manning Star of the Week honors after his work in NC State's win over Louisville this season. NC State University Athletics ↗
- •Bailey threw for a career-high 373 yards and two touchdowns as NC State beat Louisville 31-28. The North State Journal ↗
- •Coverage of his Louisville game calls it a career-best passing performance and praises his play in the win. On3 ↗
Summaries of recent news coverage in our own words. Tap a source to read the original.
Against every FBS QB
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per dropback0.41Top 11%
- Success rate50.0%Top 13%
- Completion %64.3%Top 40%
- Yards per attempt8.1Top 29%
- Sack rate3.9%Top 28%
- Interception rate1.5%Top 35%
- Deep throw rate14.6%Top 40%
- EPA per carry0.36Top 47%
What he does best
- EPA per dropback (Top 11%)
- Success rate (Top 13%)
What to work on
- EPA per carry (Top 47%, his lowest mark)
- Completion % (Top 40%, his lowest mark)
- 1st down (-0.02 per play, vs +1.01 3rd/4th down)
No true weak spots at his position, so these are his lowest marks.
Coaching notes
- By down. Best: 3rd/4th down (+1.01 per play). Toughest: 1st down (-0.02).
- Pressure. Best: clean pocket (+0.53 per play). Toughest: under pressure (-0.43).
- Standard vs passing downs. Best: passing downs (+0.72 per play). Toughest: standard downs (+0.04).
Players like Bailey
The closest matches at his position across every stat, not just the total.
- 77%match
+6.16 points added per game
Compare to Bailey - 71%match
+6.33 points added per game
Compare to Bailey - 69%match
+4.12 points added per game
Compare to Bailey
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 1st down-0.02 EPA · 51% succ · 75 plays
- 2nd down+0.37 EPA · 44% succ · 70 plays
- 3rd/4th down+1.01 EPA · 56% succ · 59 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Passing downs+0.72 EPA · 48% succ · 111 plays
- Standard downs+0.04 EPA · 53% succ · 93 plays
Red zone
- Red zone+0.54 EPA · 44% succ · 23 plays
Against top defenses
- vs everyone else+0.29 EPA · 50% succ · 135 plays
- vs top-40 defenses+0.65 EPA · 51% succ · 69 plays
Short vs deep
- Short throws+0.56 EPA · 56% succ · 164 plays
- Deep throws+0.60 EPA · 36% succ · 28 plays
Direction
- Right+0.46 EPA · 46% succ · 95 plays
- Left+0.65 EPA · 60% succ · 53 plays
- Middle+0.69 EPA · 59% succ · 44 plays
Pressure
- Clean pocket+0.53 EPA · 55% succ · 178 plays
- Under pressure-0.43 EPA · 15% succ · 26 plays
Season stats
| Att | Cmp | Cmp% | Pass Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Sacked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 196 | 126 | 64.3% | 1,580 | 8.1 | 9 | 3 | 8 |
| Car | Rush Yds | YPC | Rush TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 | 220 | 6.3 | 2 |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Passing | Rushing | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at Virginia | 10/20, 77 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT | 6 car, 31 yds, 0 TD | -0.15 |
| 2 | vsRichmond | 9/10, 193 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT | 4 car, 26 yds, 1 TD | +1.33 |
| 3 | at Vanderbilt | 24/37, 262 yds, 3 TD, 1 INT | 7 car, 46 yds, 0 TD | +0.22 |
| 4 | vs App State | 23/32, 233 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT | 2 car, 6 yds, 1 TD | +0.23 |
| 5 | vs Louisville | 24/39, 373 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT | 5 car, 31 yds, 0 TD | +0.82 |
| 6 | vs Wake Forest | 19/27, 186 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT | 4 car, 4 yds, 0 TD | +0.41 |
| 8 | at Stanford | 17/31, 256 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT | 7 car, 76 yds, 0 TD | +0.40 |