TeamsPlayers
Statboy Sports

College Football · Players · Through Week 8

Compareplayers.

Put any two players side by side: rank, points added, every stat with where it ranks nationally, and how each one does in different situations. When it looks right, share it as a graphic.

Mario Craver

Texas A&M · WR

#299 of 368 WRs · Bottom 20%

-0.28

points added per game

vs
T.J. Moore

Clemson · WR

#312 of 368 WRs · Bottom 16%

-0.36

points added per game

  • ▲-0.28Points added per game-0.36
  • ▲0.26Bottom 24%EPA per target0.23Bottom 23%
  • ▲42.9%Bottom 30%Target success rate39.1%Bottom 17%
  • 59.2%Bottom 33%Catch rate63.0%▲Bottom 49%
  • 5.6Bottom 10%Yards per target5.6Bottom 10%
  • 3.5Bottom 6%Average depth of target4.4Bottom 9%
  • ▲6.0Top 24%Yards after catch4.5Bottom 45%
  • 24.5%Top 13%Target share22.0%Top 22%
  • ▲49Targets46
  • 29Receptions29
  • ▲274Receiving yards258
  • ▲2Receiving TDs1

▲ marks the better number. "Top X%" is where each stat ranks among FBS players at that position.

Situational splits

Points added per play in each situation, adjusted for opponents.

  • ▲+0.5615 plays2nd down+0.2815 plays
  • -0.1220 plays1st down+0.23▲21 plays
  • ▲+0.4814 plays3rd/4th down+0.1510 plays
  • -0.0825 playsStandard downs+0.17▲26 plays
  • ▲+0.6024 playsPassing downs+0.3120 plays
  • ▲+0.664 playsRed zone+0.177 plays
  • ▲+0.3610 playsvs everyone else+0.1831 plays
  • +0.2339 playsvs top-40 defenses+0.33▲15 plays
  • +0.2942 playsShort targets+0.39▲39 plays
  • ▲+0.097 playsDeep targets-0.667 plays

Choose the players

Player 1
Player 2

Type a name or a team. Players at the same position get the full stat-by-stat comparison.

Share this graphic

Downloads this comparison as an Instagram-ready image (1080 × 1350).

Share this graphicPreview ↗