TeamsPlayers
Statboy Sports

College Football · Players · Through Week 8

Compareplayers.

Put any two players side by side: rank, points added, every stat with where it ranks nationally, and how each one does in different situations. When it looks right, share it as a graphic.

Matt Vezza

Ohio · QB

#112 of 160 QBs · Bottom 31%

-0.19

points added per game

vs
Will Hammond

Texas Tech · QB

#82 of 160 QBs · Bottom 50%

+1.09

points added per game

  • -0.19Points added per game+1.09▲
  • -0.17Bottom 5%EPA per dropback0.17▲Bottom 49%
  • ▲52.4%Top 8%Success rate46.7%Top 26%
  • 66.7%Top 22%Completion %67.0%▲Top 19%
  • ▲7.4Top 45%Yards per attempt7.0Bottom 46%
  • 9.5%Bottom 12%Sack rate4.8%▲Top 41%
  • 3.5%Bottom 12%Interception rate2.5%▲Bottom 37%
  • 11.1%Bottom 26%Deep throw rate13.8%Top 48%
  • ▲0.81Top 4%EPA per carry0.55Top 24%
  • 57Pass attempts200▲
  • 38Completions134▲
  • 422Passing yards1,404▲
  • 3Passing TDs3
  • ▲2Interceptions5
  • ▲6Sacks taken10

▲ marks the better number. "Top X%" is where each stat ranks among FBS players at that position.

Situational splits

Points added per play in each situation, adjusted for opponents.

  • ▲+0.1129 plays1st down+0.09101 plays
  • -1.3016 plays3rd/4th down+0.46▲46 plays
  • ▲+0.3618 plays2nd down+0.0763 plays
  • ▲+0.2040 playsStandard downs+0.07127 plays
  • -0.8323 playsPassing downs+0.32▲83 plays
  • -0.419 playsRed zone-0.09▲22 plays
  • -2.742 playsvs top-40 defenses+0.03▲28 plays
  • -0.0961 playsvs everyone else+0.19▲182 plays
  • +0.1648 playsShort throws+0.32▲169 plays
  • ▲+0.746 playsDeep throws+0.2927 plays
  • ▲+1.179 playsMiddle+0.3854 plays
  • ▲+0.5017 playsLeft+0.3853 plays
  • -0.2428 playsRight+0.23▲89 plays
  • -1.958 playsUnder pressure-0.96▲22 plays
  • +0.0855 playsClean pocket+0.30▲188 plays

Choose the players

Player 1
Player 2

Type a name or a team. Players at the same position get the full stat-by-stat comparison.

Share this graphic

Downloads this comparison as an Instagram-ready image (1080 × 1350).

Share this graphicPreview ↗