Not enough snaps to be ranked yet
What the numbers say about Dakota
- •Top 8% of tight ends in target success rate (64.3%).
Against every FBS TE
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per target0.15Bottom 18%
- Target success rate64.3%Top 8%
- Catch rate71.4%Top 44%
- Yards per target7.4Top 46%
- Average depth of target7.3Top 24%
- Yards after catch3.0Bottom 7%
- Target share9.5%Bottom 7%
What he does best
- Target success rate (Top 8%)
- Average depth of target (Top 24%)
What to work on
- Yards after catch (Bottom 7%)
- EPA per target (Bottom 18%)
Share this graphicPreview ↗His scouting card as an Instagram-ready image
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 1st down+0.07 EPA · 75% succ · 8 plays
- 2nd down+0.10 EPA · 50% succ · 4 plays
- 3rd/4th down+0.55 EPA · 50% succ · 2 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Standard downs+0.09 EPA · 73% succ · 11 plays
- Passing downs+0.35 EPA · 33% succ · 3 plays
Against top defenses
- vs everyone else+0.15 EPA · 64% succ · 14 plays
Short vs deep
- Short targets+0.16 EPA · 67% succ · 12 plays
- Deep targets+0.08 EPA · 50% succ · 2 plays
Season stats
| Tgt | Rec | Catch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Rec TD | aDOT | YAC | Tgt Shr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 10 | 71.4% | 103 | 7.4 | 0 | 7.3 | 3.0 | 9.5% |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Receiving | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs NC State | 0/1, 0 yds, 0 TD | -0.94 |
| 2 | vsNorfolk State | 1/1, 5 yds, 0 TD | -0.08 |
| 3 | vs* West Virginia | 4/4, 46 yds, 0 TD | +0.46 |
| 4 | vs Delaware | 2/2, 11 yds, 0 TD | +0.17 |
| 6 | vs Syracuse | 0/2, 0 yds, 0 TD | -0.78 |
| 8 | vs Duke | 3/4, 41 yds, 0 TD | +0.61 |