#21
of 368 wide receivers · Top 5%
What the numbers say about Joseph
- •Top 24% of wide receivers in points added per target (+0.65).
- •Cooling off: +0.50 points per play over his last three games, down from +0.88 for the season.
- •Ranks #21 of 368 wide receivers (top 6%) with +2.05 points added per game.
What people are saying about Joseph
Updated Oct 24- •Joseph Williams was added to the Biletnikoff Award watch list, an honor given to the nation's top receiver, according to multiple outlets. University of Colorado Athletics ↗
- •Coverage notes Williams is among the nation's leaders in Colorado's stat rankings heading into the bye week. 247Sports ↗
- •Williams scored a touchdown for the Buffs, with the Daily Camera describing how he regained his focus to find the end zone. Daily Camera ↗
Summaries of recent news coverage in our own words. Tap a source to read the original.
Against every FBS WR
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per target0.65Top 24%
- Target success rate51.4%Top 42%
- Catch rate61.4%Bottom 41%
- Yards per target8.9Top 39%
- Average depth of target8.7Top 48%
- Yards after catch5.9Top 25%
- Target share30.8%Top 2%
What he does best
- Target share (Top 2%)
- EPA per target (Top 24%)
- Yards after catch (Top 25%)
What to work on
- Catch rate (Bottom 41%, his lowest mark)
- Target success rate (Top 42%, his lowest mark)
- 1st down (+0.27 per play, vs +1.20 3rd/4th down)
No true weak spots at his position, so these are his lowest marks.
Coaching notes
- By down. Best: 3rd/4th down (+1.20 per play). Toughest: 1st down (+0.27).
- Against top defenses. Best: vs everyone else (+1.10 per play). Toughest: vs top-40 defenses (+0.40).
- Standard vs passing downs. Best: passing downs (+0.94 per play). Toughest: standard downs (+0.43).
Share this graphicPreview ↗His scouting card as an Instagram-ready image
Players like Williams
The closest matches at his position across every stat, not just the total.
- 80%match
+2.35 points added per game
Compare to Williams - 76%match
+1.60 points added per game
Compare to Williams - 75%match
+1.12 points added per game
Compare to Williams
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 2nd down+0.78 EPA · 55% succ · 31 plays
- 1st down+0.27 EPA · 44% succ · 27 plays
- 3rd/4th down+1.20 EPA · 58% succ · 12 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Standard downs+0.43 EPA · 51% succ · 39 plays
- Passing downs+0.94 EPA · 52% succ · 31 plays
Red zone
- Red zone+1.04 EPA · 40% succ · 5 plays
Against top defenses
- vs top-40 defenses+0.40 EPA · 47% succ · 45 plays
- vs everyone else+1.10 EPA · 60% succ · 25 plays
Short vs deep
- Short targets+0.66 EPA · 53% succ · 60 plays
- Deep targets+0.60 EPA · 40% succ · 10 plays
Season stats
| Tgt | Rec | Catch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Rec TD | aDOT | YAC | Tgt Shr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | 43 | 61.4% | 620 | 8.9 | 5 | 8.7 | 5.9 | 30.8% |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Receiving | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at Georgia Tech | 2/5, 23 yds, 0 TD | +0.25 |
| 2 | vsWeber State | 4/4, 123 yds, 2 TD | +2.94 |
| 3 | at Northwestern | 4/7, 85 yds, 1 TD | +0.97 |
| 4 | at Baylor | 10/17, 112 yds, 1 TD | +0.48 |
| 5 | vs Texas Tech | 10/17, 93 yds, 1 TD | +0.49 |
| 7 | vs Utah | 5/11, 54 yds, 0 TD | +0.15 |
| 8 | at Oklahoma State | 8/9, 130 yds, 0 TD | +0.86 |