#4
of 368 wide receivers · Top 1%
What the numbers say about Justin
- •Ranks #4 of 368 wide receivers in points added per game (+3.18).
- •#2 among 368 qualified wide receivers on short targets (+1.17 points per play).
- •Top 1% of wide receivers in points added per target (+1.11).
What people are saying about Justin
Updated Oct 24- •Bowick once again led the Oklahoma State receiving corps in the game against UCF, according to Pokes Report. Pokes Report ↗
- •ESPN analyst Mel Kiper Jr. singled out Bowick as a notable NFL draft prospect for his play this season. Pistols Firing ↗
- •RotoWire describes Bowick as a steady touchdown producer who has kept his scoring streak going. RotoWire ↗
Summaries of recent news coverage in our own words. Tap a source to read the original.
Against every FBS WR
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per target1.11Top 1%
- Target success rate62.7%Top 7%
- Catch rate66.7%Top 38%
- Yards per target11.9Top 7%
- Average depth of target10.6Top 25%
- Yards after catch7.2Top 9%
- Target share21.2%Top 26%
What he does best
- EPA per target (Top 1%)
- Target success rate (Top 7%)
- Yards per target (Top 7%)
What to work on
- Catch rate (Top 38%, his lowest mark)
- 1st down (+0.67 per play, vs +1.92 3rd/4th down)
No true weak spots at his position, so these are his lowest marks.
Coaching notes
- By down. Best: 3rd/4th down (+1.92 per play). Toughest: 1st down (+0.67).
- Standard vs passing downs. Best: passing downs (+1.54 per play). Toughest: standard downs (+0.73).
- Against top defenses. Best: vs top-40 defenses (+1.21 per play). Toughest: vs everyone else (+1.02).
Share this graphicPreview ↗His scouting card as an Instagram-ready image
Players like Bowick
The closest matches at his position across every stat, not just the total.
- 88%match
+3.04 points added per game
Compare to Bowick - 85%match
+2.34 points added per game
Compare to Bowick - 77%match
+1.78 points added per game
Compare to Bowick
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 2nd down+1.16 EPA · 65% succ · 23 plays
- 1st down+0.67 EPA · 58% succ · 19 plays
- 3rd/4th down+1.92 EPA · 67% succ · 9 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Standard downs+0.73 EPA · 63% succ · 27 plays
- Passing downs+1.54 EPA · 63% succ · 24 plays
Red zone
- Red zone+1.21 EPA · 60% succ · 10 plays
Against top defenses
- vs everyone else+1.02 EPA · 65% succ · 26 plays
- vs top-40 defenses+1.21 EPA · 60% succ · 25 plays
Short vs deep
- Short targets+1.17 EPA · 66% succ · 47 plays
- Deep targets+0.38 EPA · 25% succ · 4 plays
Season stats
| Tgt | Rec | Catch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Rec TD | aDOT | YAC | Tgt Shr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | 34 | 66.7% | 607 | 11.9 | 7 | 10.6 | 7.2 | 21.2% |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Receiving | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at Tulsa | 2/5, 22 yds, 1 TD | +0.37 |
| 2 | vs Oregon | 5/9, 81 yds, 0 TD | +0.67 |
| 3 | vsMurray State | 9/10, 178 yds, 2 TD | +1.41 |
| 4 | at West Virginia | 4/6, 63 yds, 1 TD | +0.70 |
| 6 | vs UCF | 6/9, 98 yds, 1 TD | +1.27 |
| 7 | at Houston | 3/5, 27 yds, 1 TD | +1.27 |
| 8 | vs Colorado | 5/7, 138 yds, 1 TD | +1.82 |