Not enough snaps to be ranked yet
What the numbers say about Landon
- •Top 20% of wide receivers in yards after catch (6.4).
Against every FBS WR
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per target0.33Bottom 35%
- Target success rate38.9%Bottom 17%
- Catch rate44.4%Bottom 5%
- Yards per target7.1Bottom 32%
- Average depth of target9.5Top 39%
- Yards after catch6.4Top 20%
- Target share11.1%Bottom 9%
What he does best
- Yards after catch (Top 20%)
What to work on
- Catch rate (Bottom 5%)
- Target success rate (Bottom 17%)
Share this graphicPreview ↗His scouting card as an Instagram-ready image
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 1st down+0.52 EPA · 57% succ · 7 plays
- 2nd down+0.22 EPA · 33% succ · 6 plays
- 3rd/4th down+0.21 EPA · 20% succ · 5 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Standard downs+0.54 EPA · 55% succ · 11 plays
- Passing downs+0.01 EPA · 14% succ · 7 plays
Red zone
- Red zone+2.01 EPA · 100% succ · 1 plays
Against top defenses
- vs everyone else+0.18 EPA · 33% succ · 12 plays
- vs top-40 defenses+0.65 EPA · 50% succ · 6 plays
Short vs deep
- Short targets+0.31 EPA · 38% succ · 16 plays
- Deep targets+0.50 EPA · 50% succ · 2 plays
Season stats
| Tgt | Rec | Catch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Rec TD | aDOT | YAC | Tgt Shr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 8 | 44.4% | 127 | 7.1 | 1 | 9.5 | 6.4 | 11.1% |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Receiving | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at California | 1/2, 20 yds, 0 TD | +1.29 |
| 3 | vs Purdue | 3/4, 22 yds, 1 TD | +0.75 |
| 4 | at Maryland | 0/3, 0 yds, 0 TD | -0.69 |
| 6 | at Oregon | 1/2, 26 yds, 0 TD | +0.37 |
| 7 | vs Wisconsin | 2/4, 57 yds, 0 TD | +0.79 |
| 8 | vs Michigan State | 1/3, 2 yds, 0 TD | -0.45 |