Not enough snaps to be ranked yet
What the numbers say about London
- •Top 1% of wide receivers in target success rate (78.6%).
- •Heating up: +1.70 points per play over his last three games, up from +1.18 for the season.
Against every FBS WR
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per target1.06Top 2%
- Target success rate78.6%Top 1%
- Catch rate85.7%Top 2%
- Yards per target8.6Top 44%
- Average depth of target6.2Bottom 25%
- Yards after catch4.6Bottom 46%
- Target share11.9%Bottom 14%
What he does best
- Target success rate (Top 1%)
- EPA per target (Top 2%)
- Catch rate (Top 2%)
What to work on
- Yards after catch (Bottom 46%, his lowest mark)
- Yards per target (Top 44%, his lowest mark)
No true weak spots at his position, so these are his lowest marks.
Share this graphicPreview ↗His scouting card as an Instagram-ready image
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 1st down+1.03 EPA · 88% succ · 8 plays
- 2nd down+0.73 EPA · 50% succ · 4 plays
- 3rd/4th down+1.88 EPA · 100% succ · 2 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Standard downs+1.08 EPA · 82% succ · 11 plays
- Passing downs+1.02 EPA · 67% succ · 3 plays
Red zone
- Red zone+2.24 EPA · 100% succ · 3 plays
Against top defenses
- vs everyone else+0.42 EPA · 57% succ · 7 plays
- vs top-40 defenses+1.71 EPA · 100% succ · 7 plays
Short vs deep
- Short targets+0.95 EPA · 82% succ · 11 plays
- Deep targets+1.49 EPA · 67% succ · 3 plays
Season stats
| Tgt | Rec | Catch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Rec TD | aDOT | YAC | Tgt Shr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 12 | 85.7% | 120 | 8.6 | 3 | 6.2 | 4.6 | 11.9% |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Receiving | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vs Western Kentucky | 2/4, 11 yds, 1 TD | +0.20 |
| 4 | vs Oklahoma | 2/2, 12 yds, 0 TD | +0.59 |
| 5 | vs Vanderbilt | 3/3, 19 yds, 0 TD | +0.73 |
| 6 | at Alabama | 3/3, 43 yds, 1 TD | +2.05 |
| 7 | vs Auburn | 2/2, 35 yds, 1 TD | +2.31 |