Not enough snaps to be ranked yet
What the numbers say about Quinn
- •Cooling off: -0.97 points per play over his last three games, down from -0.20 for the season.
Against every FBS WR
Where he ranks among qualified players at his position.
- EPA per target-0.21Bottom 2%
- Target success rate44.4%Bottom 36%
- Catch rate44.4%Bottom 5%
- Yards per target5.3Bottom 6%
- Average depth of target12.0Top 16%
- Yards after catch0.0Bottom 1%
- Target share4.7%Bottom 1%
What he does best
- Average depth of target (Top 16%)
What to work on
- Yards after catch (Bottom 1%)
- EPA per target (Bottom 2%)
Share this graphicPreview ↗His scouting card as an Instagram-ready image
Situational splits
Points added per play (adjusted for opponents) and success rate in each situation.
By down
- 1st down-0.06 EPA · 40% succ · 5 plays
- 2nd down+1.19 EPA · 100% succ · 2 plays
- 3rd/4th down-1.98 EPA · 0% succ · 2 plays
Standard vs passing downs
- Standard downs+0.05 EPA · 50% succ · 6 plays
- Passing downs-0.72 EPA · 33% succ · 3 plays
Red zone
- Red zone-0.41 EPA · 0% succ · 2 plays
Against top defenses
- vs everyone else-0.18 EPA · 57% succ · 7 plays
- vs top-40 defenses-0.32 EPA · 0% succ · 2 plays
Short vs deep
- Short targets+0.02 EPA · 43% succ · 7 plays
- Deep targets-1.02 EPA · 50% succ · 2 plays
Season stats
| Tgt | Rec | Catch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Rec TD | aDOT | YAC | Tgt Shr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4 | 44.4% | 48 | 5.3 | 0 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 4.7% |
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Receiving | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Ohio | 1/1, 6 yds, 0 TD | +0.35 |
| 3 | vsNorth Dakota | 1/1, 8 yds, 0 TD | +0.59 |
| 4 | at Michigan State | 2/3, 34 yds, 0 TD | +0.78 |
| 5 | vs Maryland | 0/2, 0 yds, 0 TD | -2.26 |
| 6 | vs Indiana | 0/1, 0 yds, 0 TD | -0.14 |
| 7 | at Oregon | 0/1, 0 yds, 0 TD | -0.50 |