College Football · 2026 · Week 4

StatboyPower Rankings.

What it's based on

Who is the best team right now?

How well each team plays on every snap, not its record. The computer measures offense and defense play by play (points added per play and success rate), adjusts every number for the quality of the opponent and its conference, and adds special teams (field goals and punting) plus a small credit for Record Strength. Blowout garbage time is thrown out. Last season's numbers count a little early in the year and are gone by Week 8.

Points added per play
Success rate
Opponent adjusted
Special teams
Record Strength
No garbage time

100% computer. No human votes or hand adjustments. Results through games of September 26. Updated every morning.

Share this graphicPreview ↗Graphic shows:Top 10 · Week 4 · Instagram-ready image

	Team	Move	Compare		Last Wk
1	NDNotre Dame4-0Independents · 4-0	▲2	Compare	+27.1	+22.4▲ 4.7	+46.8#1	+12.4#10	+14.3#3	0.0#78	+0.3#7	0.32	-0.15	52%	31%
2	ALAAlabama4-0SEC · 4-0	▼1	Compare	+25.9	+24.5▲ 1.4	+43.2#3	+12.4#11	+12.3#5	+0.7#47	+0.5#3	0.34	-0.11	51%	32%
3	UGAGeorgia4-0SEC · 4-0	▼1	Compare	+25.4	+23.6▲ 1.8	+43.3#2	+13.1#8	+11.7#6	+0.3#62	+0.3#8	0.32	-0.10	54%	33%
4	FLAFlorida4-0SEC · 4-0	▲4	Compare	+23.4	+20.5▲ 2.9	+35.7#8	+13.2#5	+7.1#25	+2.6#3	+0.4#4	0.33	-0.04	53%	38%
5	LSULSU3-1SEC · 3-1	▼1	Compare	+23.4	+21.5▲ 1.9	+42.8#4	+8.3#24	+16.2#1	-1.1#131	0.0#30	0.23	-0.16	50%	27%
6	BYUBYU3-0Big 12 · 3-0	▲1	Compare	+22.8	+20.7▲ 2.1	+37.8#5	+13.2#4	+8.4#14	+1.0#27	+0.2#18	0.33	-0.05	54%	36%
7	OSUOhio State3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▼1	Compare	+21.5	+20.7▲ 0.8	+37.8#6	+14.2#2	+7.4#22	0.0#80	-0.1#36	0.35	-0.04	54%	37%
8	MIAMiami4-0ACC · 4-0	▲1	Compare	+21.0	+18.8▲ 2.2	+37.3#7	+15.4#1	+5.9#34	-0.5#113	+0.3#11	0.38	-0.01	54%	38%
9	MSSTMississippi State4-0SEC · 4-0	▼4	Compare	+20.5	+21.4▼ 0.9	+35.6#9	+13.0#9	+7.4#23	-0.4#108	+0.5#2	0.32	-0.02	54%	36%
10	UTAHUtah4-0Big 12 · 4-0	▲8	Compare	+20.4	+15.5▲ 4.9	+34.9#10	+11.9#12	+8.1#16	+0.2#68	+0.3#12	0.34	-0.04	50%	35%
11	TEXTexas4-0SEC · 4-0	▲1	Compare	+20.3	+17.2▲ 3.1	+32.8#11	+4.7#47	+14.0#4	+0.9#39	+0.6#1	0.18	-0.14	46%	30%
12	IUIndiana4-0Big Ten · 4-0	▼1	Compare	+18.9	+17.4▲ 1.5	+32.7#12	+9.3#16	+9.4#10	0.0#86	+0.2#17	0.32	-0.05	45%	33%
13	TTUTexas Tech4-0Big 12 · 4-0	▲13	Compare	+18.7	+13.2▲ 5.5	+29.9#14	+7.8#26	+9.3#11	+1.2#18	+0.3#5	0.23	-0.05	50%	34%
14	OREOregon3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▲9	Compare	+18.2	+14.1▲ 4.1	+30.0#13	+9.0#19	+8.2#15	+1.0#31	0.0#31	0.30	-0.03	46%	34%
15	MIZMissouri3-1SEC · 3-1	▼1	Compare	+18.0	+16.7▲ 1.3	+29.0#15	+5.5#39	+11.1#7	+1.4#13	0.0#29	0.21	-0.09	45%	33%
16	TENNTennessee3-1SEC · 3-1	▼6	Compare	+16.7	+17.6▼ 0.9	+27.8#17	+6.4#34	+9.5#8	+1.0#29	-0.2#47	0.25	-0.07	45%	35%
17	OUOklahoma2-2SEC · 2-2	▼1	Compare	+16.6	+15.7▲ 0.9	+27.3#18	+0.5#83	+15.0#2	+1.4#12	-0.3#64	0.10	-0.16	44%	30%
18	HOUHouston3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▲9	Compare	+16.6	+13.1▲ 3.5	+28.5#16	+13.2#7	+3.1#60	+0.4#59	-0.1#33	0.29	0.04	57%	40%
19	UCLAUCLA4-0Big Ten · 4-0	▲11	Compare	+15.9	+12.6▲ 3.3	+27.0#19	+7.6#27	+7.8#18	+0.1#71	+0.3#9	0.24	-0.02	48%	34%
20	MISSOle Miss3-1SEC · 3-1	▼5	Compare	+15.6	+16.4▼ 0.8	+26.4#20	+13.8#3	+1.3#70	+0.3#65	+0.3#10	0.34	0.07	54%	42%
21	IOWAIowa4-0Big Ten · 4-0	▼8	Compare	+15.6	+16.8▼ 1.2	+25.1#22	+5.4#41	+9.0#12	+0.9#37	+0.3#6	0.22	-0.04	45%	33%
22	AUBAuburn3-1SEC · 3-1	▲7	Compare	+15.3	+13.0▲ 2.3	+26.0#21	+5.5#40	+9.4#9	+0.3#64	+0.1#23	0.21	-0.07	46%	35%
23	USCUSC4-1Big Ten · 4-1	▼3	Compare	+14.6	+15.4▼ 0.8	+23.9#26	+13.2#6	+0.4#74	+1.1#22	-0.1#45	0.34	0.10	53%	41%
24	MICHMichigan3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▲9	Compare	+14.5	+11.3▲ 3.2	+24.2#25	+6.2#36	+7.6#20	+0.7#45	-0.1#38	0.23	-0.01	45%	34%
25	PITTPittsburgh4-0ACC · 4-0	▲6	Compare	+14.3	+12.5▲ 1.8	+22.9#29	+5.9#37	+7.2#24	+1.0#28	+0.2#14	0.22	-0.01	46%	34%
26	UKKentucky3-1SEC · 3-1	▲2	Compare	+14.3	+13.1▲ 1.2	+24.7#23	+7.1#30	+7.0#26	+0.2#69	0.0#28	0.20	-0.04	50%	38%
27	VANVanderbilt3-1SEC · 3-1	▼3	Compare	+13.5	+14.0▼ 0.5	+22.2#30	+3.8#53	+8.9#13	+0.9#32	-0.1#44	0.20	-0.04	43%	34%
28	JMUJames Madison4-0Sun Belt · 4-0	▲10	Compare	+13.1	+10.3▲ 2.8	+16.8#41	+3.4#58	+6.2#31	+3.4#1	+0.2#20	0.17	-0.01	44%	37%
29	KSUKansas State3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▼4	Compare	+13.1	+13.9▼ 0.8	+20.6#35	+6.2#35	+5.5#37	+1.6#11	-0.3#60	0.22	0.01	46%	37%
30	NEBNebraska4-0Big Ten · 4-0	▲13	Compare	+13.0	+9.6▲ 3.4	+23.4#27	+8.8#20	+4.6#50	-0.5#112	+0.2#19	0.28	0.03	47%	38%
31	SMUSMU3-1ACC · 3-1	▼14	Compare	+13.0	+15.6▼ 2.6	+24.6#24	+8.0#25	+6.1#32	-0.9#129	-0.2#46	0.22	0.00	51%	37%
32	LOULouisville2-2ACC · 2-2	▼13	Compare	+12.4	+15.4▼ 3.0	+23.0#28	+8.4#23	+4.7#47	-0.3#102	-0.5#75	0.27	0.03	47%	37%
33	TA&MTexas A&M2-2SEC · 2-2	▼1	Compare	+12.1	+11.7▲ 0.4	+19.0#36	+4.9#44	+6.0#33	+1.7#10	-0.4#69	0.20	0.01	46%	36%
34	ARIZArizona3-1Big 12 · 3-1	–	Compare	+12.1	+10.9▲ 1.2	+22.1#31	+7.2#29	+5.4#39	-0.5#111	-0.1#34	0.23	0.02	48%	36%
35	WAKEWake Forest3-1ACC · 3-1	▲9	Compare	+11.9	+9.5▲ 2.4	+18.4#38	+5.5#38	+5.0#46	+1.4#15	+0.1#25	0.22	0.01	45%	39%
36	UVAVirginia3-1ACC · 3-1	–	Compare	+11.7	+10.7▲ 1.0	+21.0#32	+6.9#31	+5.1#42	0.0#83	-0.3#61	0.23	0.02	47%	37%
37	BOISBoise State3-1Pac-12 · 3-1	▲9	Compare	+11.5	+8.9▲ 2.6	+20.7#34	+6.6#33	+5.2#40	-0.2#100	-0.1#37	0.22	0.02	48%	37%
38	KUKansas1-2Big 12 · 1-2	▲7	Compare	+11.4	+9.4▲ 2.0	+20.8#33	+5.0#43	+6.9#28	+0.2#70	-0.7#97	0.22	0.02	43%	33%
39	BAYBaylor3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▲2	Compare	+11.4	+10.0▲ 1.4	+17.1#40	+2.8#64	+7.0#27	+1.7#8	-0.2#48	0.16	-0.02	44%	36%
40	VTVirginia Tech4-0ACC · 4-0	▼19	Compare	+11.3	+14.6▼ 3.3	+13.8#48	+8.7#21	-0.8#86	+3.2#2	+0.2#13	0.25	0.13	50%	42%
41	UCFUCF3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▼1	Compare	+10.8	+10.1▲ 0.7	+14.7#44	+0.3#85	+8.1#17	+2.5#4	-0.1#39	0.09	-0.03	44%	35%
42	SCSouth Carolina2-2SEC · 2-2	▼7	Compare	+10.7	+10.8▼ 0.1	+16.4#42	+4.9#45	+4.5#51	+1.7#9	-0.4#68	0.19	0.05	46%	36%
43	PSUPenn State3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▼21	Compare	+10.6	+14.6▼ 4.0	+19.0#37	+3.1#60	+7.7#19	0.0#77	-0.3#63	0.21	-0.01	40%	34%
44	NUNorthwestern2-1Big Ten · 2-1	▲4	Compare	+10.4	+7.4▲ 3.0	+18.3#39	+10.0#14	+0.5#73	+0.1#73	-0.1#42	0.27	0.07	51%	44%
45	WISWisconsin3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▲22	Compare	+9.0	+3.5▲ 5.5	+14.7#43	+2.7#69	+5.7#36	+0.5#54	0.0#26	0.15	0.01	45%	36%
46	TCUTCU2-2Big 12 · 2-2	▼4	Compare	+8.8	+9.8▼ 1.0	+14.2#46	+2.3#73	+5.8#35	+1.4#14	-0.7#94	0.16	-0.00	43%	38%
47	OKSTOklahoma State3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▲21	Compare	+8.5	+3.2▲ 5.3	+14.6#45	+3.3#59	+5.1#44	+0.3#63	-0.1#41	0.12	0.02	48%	37%
48	CINCincinnati4-0Big 12 · 4-0	▲7	Compare	+8.3	+5.9▲ 2.4	+13.0#53	+9.0#18	-1.6#91	+0.7#49	+0.2#15	0.29	0.12	47%	44%
49	WASHWashington3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▲1	Compare	+7.9	+7.2▲ 0.7	+14.0#47	+3.0#61	+5.0#45	+0.2#67	-0.4#65	0.18	-0.00	43%	40%
50	ISUIowa State2-2Big 12 · 2-2	▼13	Compare	+7.7	+10.5▼ 2.8	+13.2#50	+2.9#62	+4.7#49	+0.7#46	-0.5#78	0.18	0.00	42%	40%
51	DUKEDuke4-0ACC · 4-0	▼2	Compare	+7.4	+7.4no change	+11.5#55	+2.8#63	+3.7#57	+0.6#52	+0.2#16	0.19	0.03	41%	40%
52	UNCNorth Carolina2-1ACC · 2-1	–	Compare	+7.0	+6.2▲ 0.8	+13.2#51	+5.1#42	+2.4#62	-0.3#104	-0.2#55	0.15	0.06	51%	40%
53	ASUArizona State2-1Big 12 · 2-1	▼2	Compare	+6.9	+6.3▲ 0.6	+13.7#49	+1.5#78	+6.4#29	-0.8#119	-0.1#43	0.11	-0.02	45%	37%
54	NCSUNC State2-2ACC · 2-2	▲3	Compare	+6.8	+5.8▲ 1.0	+11.7#54	+7.5#28	-0.8#85	+0.6#51	-0.6#81	0.23	0.13	48%	42%
55	ILLIllinois2-2Big Ten · 2-2	▲5	Compare	+6.5	+4.7▲ 1.8	+10.6#58	+9.2#17	-3.1#106	+1.0#26	-0.6#87	0.27	0.17	49%	44%
56	ORSTOregon State2-2Pac-12 · 2-2	▲30	Compare	+6.3	+0.3▲ 6.0	+13.1#52	+3.4#57	+4.1#55	-0.7#118	-0.5#76	0.20	0.08	42%	34%
57	MDMaryland2-2Big Ten · 2-2	▼18	Compare	+6.2	+10.2▼ 4.0	+11.4#56	+2.4#72	+4.1#54	+0.2#66	-0.6#88	0.14	0.04	45%	38%
58	CLEMClemson3-1ACC · 3-1	▲5	Compare	+6.2	+4.0▲ 2.2	+9.0#62	-2.4#103	+7.5#21	+1.0#30	0.0#27	0.08	-0.03	39%	35%
59	MINNMinnesota3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▼3	Compare	+6.1	+5.8▲ 0.3	+7.6#70	+2.0#74	+2.3#64	+1.9#6	-0.1#40	0.13	0.08	44%	38%
60	CONNUConn2-2Independents · 2-2	▼13	Compare	+5.5	+8.0▼ 2.5	+8.7#63	+2.8#67	+2.2#65	+1.3#17	-0.8#104	0.19	0.06	41%	40%
61	UNTNorth Texas2-2American · 2-2	▲12	Compare	+5.3	+2.5▲ 2.8	+10.2#59	+10.1#13	-4.3#114	+0.1#75	-0.6#86	0.30	0.15	49%	48%
62	MSUMichigan State2-2Big Ten · 2-2	▼1	Compare	+5.3	+4.4▲ 0.9	+8.0#68	+2.5#71	+2.1#66	+1.1#20	-0.4#70	0.11	0.07	47%	40%
63	TXSTTexas State2-2Pac-12 · 2-2	▲16	Compare	+5.2	+1.3▲ 3.9	+11.3#57	+9.5#15	-3.1#105	-0.7#116	-0.6#82	0.30	0.16	47%	44%
64	ECUEast Carolina2-2American · 2-2	▲7	Compare	+5.1	+2.7▲ 2.4	+8.4#66	+1.9#75	+2.9#61	+0.9#40	-0.5#79	0.14	0.06	43%	39%
65	UTSAUTSA3-1American · 3-1	▼6	Compare	+5.1	+4.8▲ 0.3	+9.1#60	+3.8#52	+1.5#68	0.0#85	0.0#32	0.18	0.06	44%	42%
66	ARKArkansas2-2SEC · 2-2	–	Compare	+5.1	+3.7▲ 1.4	+8.4#67	+3.5#56	+1.3#71	+0.7#48	-0.4#66	0.15	0.10	46%	39%
67	FSUFlorida State2-2ACC · 2-2	▼13	Compare	+5.0	+6.1▼ 1.1	+7.7#69	+6.8#32	-2.4#99	+1.1#21	-0.5#73	0.26	0.17	45%	42%
68	UNMNew Mexico3-1Mountain West · 3-1	▲4	Compare	+4.4	+2.7▲ 1.7	+8.7#64	-0.5#90	+5.4#38	-0.3#106	-0.2#49	0.11	0.01	40%	37%
69	TOLToledo3-1MAC · 3-1	▲6	Compare	+4.1	+2.2▲ 1.9	+8.6#65	+0.6#82	+4.3#53	-0.6#114	-0.3#62	0.14	0.05	40%	36%
70	COLOColorado2-2Big 12 · 2-2	–	Compare	+4.0	+3.0▲ 1.0	+9.1#61	+0.1#86	+5.1#41	-0.7#117	-0.5#77	0.12	0.03	41%	37%
71	LTLouisiana Tech1-2Sun Belt · 1-2	▼9	Compare	+3.6	+4.1▼ 0.5	+6.2#71	-1.1#95	+4.7#48	+0.5#56	-0.5#72	0.10	0.06	40%	34%
72	PURPurdue1-3Big Ten · 1-3	▼8	Compare	+3.5	+3.8▼ 0.3	+5.3#72	+8.5#22	-5.5#127	+1.2#19	-0.8#107	0.26	0.20	49%	46%
73	NDSUNorth Dakota State4-0Mountain West · 4-0	▼4	Compare	+3.1	+3.1no change	+4.1#74	-2.7#106	+5.1#43	+0.7#50	+0.1#21	0.09	-0.01	37%	40%
74	USFSouth Florida4-0American · 4-0	▼16	Compare	+3.0	+5.5▼ 2.5	+3.4#75	+4.1#50	-2.1#97	+0.9#33	+0.1#22	0.16	0.11	47%	47%
75	GASTGeorgia State3-1Sun Belt · 3-1	▼10	Compare	+2.6	+3.7▼ 1.1	+2.6#79	+2.8#65	-1.3#88	+1.3#16	-0.3#58	0.14	0.15	45%	41%
76	MEMMemphis3-1American · 3-1	▲2	Compare	+1.9	+1.5▲ 0.4	+2.8#77	+4.4#48	-2.8#104	+0.5#55	-0.2#57	0.19	0.18	45%	42%
77	SYRSyracuse1-2ACC · 1-2	▼1	Compare	+1.8	+1.7▲ 0.1	+2.6#80	-1.9#100	+3.4#58	+1.0#25	-0.7#101	0.06	0.04	41%	40%
78	GTGeorgia Tech1-3ACC · 1-3	▼4	Compare	+1.6	+2.4▼ 0.8	+5.1#73	+4.7#46	-1.8#94	-0.1#90	-1.2#126	0.20	0.14	45%	44%
79	WVUWest Virginia3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▼26	Compare	+1.3	+6.1▼ 4.8	+3.0#76	+3.5#55	-1.8#93	-0.2#97	-0.2#50	0.17	0.13	45%	44%
80	TLSATulsa3-1American · 3-1	▲1	Compare	+1.1	+0.8▲ 0.3	+2.6#78	-2.4#104	+3.9#56	-0.2#96	-0.2#51	0.07	0.05	40%	37%
81	LIBLiberty3-1CUSA · 3-1	▲28	Compare	+0.2	-4.7▲ 4.9	+0.1#85	+0.4#84	-0.3#83	+0.3#61	-0.2#56	0.08	0.14	45%	40%
82	M-OHMiami (OH)2-2MAC · 2-2	▲9	Compare	0.0	-0.8▲ 0.8	+2.4#81	+1.7#77	-0.3#82	-0.9#127	-0.5#80	0.15	0.11	42%	42%
83	ARMYArmy2-1American · 2-1	▼3	Compare	-0.2	+0.9▼ 1.1	-1.3#89	+2.7#70	-3.4#108	+0.9#34	-0.4#67	0.15	0.17	44%	44%
84	ULLouisiana3-1Sun Belt · 3-1	▲14	Compare	-0.2	-2.2▲ 2.0	+0.3#83	-4.3#116	+4.5#52	-0.2#94	-0.2#54	0.04	0.01	37%	40%
85	FAUFlorida Atlantic3-1American · 3-1	▲8	Compare	-0.3	-1.0▲ 0.7	-1.4#90	+1.7#76	-2.5#101	+0.6#53	-0.1#35	0.13	0.20	44%	40%
86	MASSMassachusetts4-0MAC · 4-0	▼1	Compare	-0.7	+0.4▼ 1.1	-5.2#104	-3.0#107	0.0#78	+2.2#5	+0.1#24	0.05	0.11	39%	42%
87	JXSTJacksonville State3-2CUSA · 3-2	▲3	Compare	-1.0	-0.3▼ 0.7	-1.8#92	+1.3#80	-2.4#98	+0.9#38	-0.8#106	0.10	0.13	46%	45%
88	AFAir Force2-1Mountain West · 2-1	▲18	Compare	-1.3	-3.4▲ 2.1	-1.0#88	+2.8#66	-3.4#107	-0.3#103	-0.4#71	0.17	0.19	43%	43%
89	RUTGRutgers1-3Big Ten · 1-3	▲10	Compare	-1.3	-2.4▲ 1.1	-0.7#87	+4.1#49	-4.5#115	+0.3#60	-1.3#129	0.16	0.18	47%	46%
90	NAVYNavy1-2American · 1-2	▼7	Compare	-1.4	+0.5▼ 1.9	+0.4#82	+2.7#68	-2.5#100	-0.8#121	-0.9#110	0.13	0.19	46%	40%
91	CALCalifornia2-2ACC · 2-2	▼4	Compare	-1.7	+0.2▼ 1.9	+0.1#86	-0.8#92	+0.9#72	-1.1#130	-0.7#93	0.08	0.10	42%	40%
92	CSUColorado State2-2Pac-12 · 2-2	▲16	Compare	-1.8	-4.7▲ 2.9	-1.6#91	+3.6#54	-4.5#116	-0.3#105	-0.6#90	0.21	0.19	41%	46%
93	TULNTulane2-2American · 2-2	▼4	Compare	-1.9	-0.1▼ 1.8	-1.9#93	-1.4#97	+0.3#76	-0.2#101	-0.6#89	0.13	0.12	36%	40%
94	GASOGeorgia Southern1-3Sun Belt · 1-3	–	Compare	-2.1	-1.0▼ 1.1	+0.3#84	+0.9#81	-0.7#84	-1.2#132	-1.1#121	0.12	0.17	43%	38%
95	ODUOld Dominion1-3Sun Belt · 1-3	▼13	Compare	-2.4	+0.8▼ 3.2	-3.0#95	-8.1#132	+6.4#30	+0.4#58	-1.1#120	-0.00	0.01	32%	35%
96	APPApp State3-1Sun Belt · 3-1	▼4	Compare	-2.6	-0.9▼ 1.7	-4.2#101	-1.0#94	-1.4#90	0.0#82	-0.2#53	0.10	0.13	40%	43%
97	STANStanford2-2ACC · 2-2	▲7	Compare	-2.7	-3.2▲ 0.5	-3.8#98	+1.4#79	-3.6#110	0.0#79	-0.6#84	0.17	0.17	40%	45%
98	WSUWashington State1-3Pac-12 · 1-3	▲4	Compare	-3.0	-2.9▼ 0.1	-2.1#94	-3.6#111	+2.4#63	-0.8#123	-1.0#114	0.05	0.05	38%	41%
99	DELDelaware2-2CUSA · 2-2	▼11	Compare	-3.2	0.0▼ 3.2	-4.0#100	-0.2#88	-2.1#96	-0.4#110	-0.6#85	0.10	0.15	42%	43%
100	USUUtah State1-3Pac-12 · 1-3	▲7	Compare	-3.3	-4.5▲ 1.2	-3.9#99	-3.8#113	+1.6#67	-0.1#89	-1.0#116	0.05	0.06	38%	42%
101	FRESFresno State3-1Pac-12 · 3-1	▼4	Compare	-3.4	-2.2▼ 1.2	-7.4#108	-4.2#115	-0.1#79	+1.1#23	-0.2#52	0.06	0.07	36%	45%
102	WMUWestern Michigan2-2MAC · 2-2	▼6	Compare	-3.4	-1.8▼ 1.6	-6.5#106	-2.3#102	-1.4#89	+0.9#36	-0.6#91	0.06	0.11	40%	45%
103	TEMTemple1-3American · 1-3	▼3	Compare	-3.7	-2.7▼ 1.0	-4.6#102	+4.1#51	-6.7#134	+0.1#72	-1.2#128	0.20	0.22	44%	48%
104	SHSUSam Houston1-3CUSA · 1-3	▼20	Compare	-3.9	+0.5▼ 4.4	-3.8#97	-1.1#96	-1.0#87	-0.6#115	-1.1#123	0.04	0.14	45%	41%
105	USMSouthern Miss1-3Sun Belt · 1-3	▼2	Compare	-4.1	-3.2▼ 0.9	-3.7#96	-1.9#99	-0.2#80	-0.9#126	-1.1#122	0.06	0.11	41%	42%
106	TROYTroy2-2Sun Belt · 2-2	▼11	Compare	-4.4	-1.1▼ 3.3	-5.1#103	-3.3#110	+0.4#75	-0.8#122	-0.6#92	0.04	0.11	40%	41%
107	BCBoston College2-2ACC · 2-2	▲5	Compare	-5.1	-6.0▲ 0.9	-5.2#105	-6.1#122	+3.2#59	-1.5#137	-0.7#96	0.01	0.05	36%	39%
108	UNLVUNLV2-2Mountain West · 2-2	▲12	Compare	-5.1	-8.4▲ 3.3	-7.4#107	-4.5#117	+0.3#77	-0.1#93	-0.8#105	0.05	0.11	36%	41%
109	UABUAB2-2American · 2-2	▲2	Compare	-5.2	-5.7▲ 0.5	-9.2#111	-3.2#109	-2.0#95	+0.8#43	-0.7#102	0.03	0.13	41%	44%
110	SDSUSan Diego State1-3Pac-12 · 1-3	–	Compare	-5.3	-4.8▼ 0.5	-9.4#113	-5.2#119	-0.2#81	+1.1#24	-1.0#115	0.03	0.09	36%	44%
111	KENNKennesaw State1-3CUSA · 1-3	▼6	Compare	-5.7	-3.3▼ 2.4	-7.9#109	-0.5#91	-4.0#112	-0.1#88	-1.1#124	0.08	0.18	43%	45%
112	OHIOOhio2-2MAC · 2-2	▲4	Compare	-6.1	-6.8▲ 0.7	-9.4#112	-0.1#87	-5.3#124	0.0#81	-0.7#99	0.12	0.23	41%	43%
113	CCUCoastal Carolina1-3Sun Belt · 1-3	▼36	Compare	-6.2	+1.7▼ 7.9	-10.0#114	-3.0#108	-2.7#103	+0.9#41	-1.3#131	0.07	0.15	38%	45%
114	ARSTArkansas State2-2Sun Belt · 2-2	▼1	Compare	-6.6	-6.1▼ 0.5	-8.7#110	-1.5#98	-3.5#109	-0.9#128	-0.7#98	0.05	0.17	44%	45%
115	FIUFlorida International2-2CUSA · 2-2	▼14	Compare	-7.5	-2.8▼ 4.7	-11.0#115	-7.7#131	+1.4#69	-0.4#109	-0.8#108	-0.04	0.10	36%	39%
116	USASouth Alabama2-2Sun Belt · 2-2	▼1	Compare	-8.2	-6.4▼ 1.8	-13.1#116	-0.9#93	-6.6#132	0.0#84	-0.7#95	0.11	0.23	39%	47%
117	NEVNevada1-3Mountain West · 1-3	▲5	Compare	-9.2	-9.1▼ 0.1	-16.8#122	-7.0#126	-2.6#102	+1.8#7	-1.4#133	-0.03	0.17	37%	43%
118	MTSUMiddle Tennessee2-2CUSA · 2-2	▼1	Compare	-9.5	-7.7▼ 1.8	-14.8#119	-3.9#114	-4.6#117	-0.1#91	-0.9#111	0.05	0.18	38%	46%
119	WYOWyoming2-2Mountain West · 2-2	▲9	Compare	-9.6	-12.1▲ 2.5	-16.7#121	-4.7#118	-4.9#118	+0.9#35	-0.9#112	0.01	0.16	39%	49%
120	MOSTMissouri State1-3CUSA · 1-3	▼1	Compare	-9.8	-8.4▼ 1.4	-13.8#118	-2.7#105	-5.2#122	-0.8#120	-1.1#118	0.07	0.18	39%	47%
121	RICERice1-3American · 1-3	▲4	Compare	-10.0	-10.8▲ 0.8	-13.4#117	-2.2#101	-5.4#126	-1.3#135	-1.0#117	0.05	0.20	41%	46%
122	SJSUSan José State2-2Mountain West · 2-2	▲1	Compare	-10.2	-10.0▼ 0.2	-16.0#120	-7.5#128	-1.7#92	-0.4#107	-0.7#100	-0.01	0.13	34%	44%
123	MRSHMarshall3-1Sun Belt · 3-1	▼9	Compare	-10.8	-6.4▼ 4.4	-18.1#123	-0.4#89	-10.0#138	-0.2#95	-0.3#59	0.10	0.28	41%	50%
124	WKUWestern Kentucky1-3CUSA · 1-3	▲6	Compare	-12.2	-12.9▲ 0.7	-20.0#127	-3.7#112	-7.7#136	+0.1#76	-0.8#109	0.03	0.25	40%	47%
125	EMUEastern Michigan2-3MAC · 2-3	▲9	Compare	-13.2	-14.4▲ 1.2	-20.8#128	-6.8#125	-5.1#120	-0.1#87	-1.2#127	-0.01	0.22	36%	44%
126	AKRAkron1-3MAC · 1-3	▼8	Compare	-13.2	-7.8▼ 5.4	-19.7#125	-5.3#120	-6.0#130	-0.9#125	-1.1#125	-0.03	0.23	41%	45%
127	CMUCentral Michigan2-2MAC · 2-2	–	Compare	-13.3	-11.8▼ 1.5	-22.0#129	-6.8#124	-5.8#129	-0.1#92	-0.6#83	0.02	0.19	34%	48%
128	NMSUNew Mexico State1-3CUSA · 1-3	▼7	Compare	-13.4	-8.7▼ 4.7	-18.7#124	-5.3#121	-5.3#125	-1.4#136	-1.3#130	-0.00	0.20	39%	47%
129	HAWHawai'i1-3Mountain West · 1-3	▼5	Compare	-13.6	-10.4▼ 3.2	-22.7#130	-6.4#123	-6.6#131	+0.8#44	-1.4#132	0.00	0.21	36%	49%
130	NIUNorthern Illinois0-4Mountain West · 0-4	▼4	Compare	-13.9	-11.7▼ 2.2	-19.8#126	-7.3#127	-4.0#113	-1.2#133	-1.5#134	-0.07	0.20	40%	43%
131	SACSacramento State1-4MAC · 1-4	–	Compare	-14.6	-13.1▼ 1.5	-23.7#131	-8.3#133	-5.3#123	+0.8#42	-1.8#138	-0.07	0.24	38%	43%
132	KENTKent State2-2MAC · 2-2	▲5	Compare	-15.0	-15.2▲ 0.2	-25.0#133	-9.1#135	-5.1#121	-0.2#98	-0.5#74	-0.02	0.20	31%	46%
133	BALLBall State1-3MAC · 1-3	▲3	Compare	-16.2	-14.7▼ 1.5	-27.2#136	-8.6#134	-6.9#135	+0.5#57	-1.1#119	-0.02	0.26	32%	45%
134	UTEPUTEP1-3Mountain West · 1-3	▲1	Compare	-16.6	-14.7▼ 1.9	-24.8#132	-7.6#130	-6.6#133	-1.5#138	-0.9#113	-0.08	0.20	40%	49%
135	BUFBuffalo2-2MAC · 2-2	▼6	Compare	-16.8	-12.3▼ 4.5	-28.1#137	-10.4#137	-5.6#128	+0.1#74	-0.8#103	-0.07	0.24	32%	43%
136	CLTCharlotte0-4American · 0-4	▼4	Compare	-17.2	-13.1▼ 4.1	-26.8#135	-10.4#136	-4.9#119	-0.2#99	-1.7#137	-0.09	0.18	35%	47%
137	ULMUL Monroe0-4Sun Belt · 0-4	▼4	Compare	-18.2	-14.3▼ 3.9	-26.8#134	-7.5#129	-7.8#137	-1.2#134	-1.6#136	-0.06	0.24	38%	49%
138	BGSUBowling Green0-4MAC · 0-4	–	Compare	-19.7	-18.8▼ 0.9	-30.2#138	-13.6#138	-3.7#111	-0.8#124	-1.6#135	-0.14	0.16	31%	46%

Tap a column name to sort. Small numbers next to each value are that team's national rank.

How to read the rating

+30.6 means about 30 points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field. Compare two teams' ratings to see who the computer thinks is better, and by about how much. Last Wk shows last week's rating, so you can tell whether a team actually improved or just passed a team that dropped.

Offense + defense + special teams + record

Each part is in points per game versus average, so they add up to the Power rating. A big defense number means opponents score far less than usual against them. Record (how impressive the record is for its schedule) gets only a small say, because in testing more weight made the rating worse at telling who's better.

Why it can differ from the résumé

A team can play great and still lose close games, or win ugly against a soft schedule. The Power Rankings judge how good a team is; the Résumé Rankings judge what it has earned.