College Football · 2026 · Week 7

StatboyPower Rankings.

What it's based on

Who is the best team right now?

How well each team plays on every snap, not its record. The computer measures offense and defense play by play (points added per play and success rate), adjusts every number for the quality of the opponent and its conference, and adds special teams (field goals and punting) plus a small credit for Record Strength. Blowout garbage time is thrown out. Last season's numbers count a little early in the year and are gone by Week 8.

Points added per play
Success rate
Opponent adjusted
Special teams
Record Strength
No garbage time

100% computer. No human votes or hand adjustments. Results through games of October 17. Updated every morning.

Share this graphicPreview ↗Graphic shows:Top 10 · Week 7 · Instagram-ready image

	Team	Move	Compare		Last Wk
1	NDNotre Dame6-1Independents · 6-1	▲1	Compare	+30.8	+30.6▲ 0.2	+51.2#1	+16.3#3	+14.0#6	+0.2#67	+0.3#13	0.41	-0.14	53%	32%
2	ALAAlabama5-2SEC · 5-2	▼1	Compare	+28.4	+31.3▼ 2.9	+46.2#3	+12.9#10	+14.4#4	+0.9#29	+0.2#15	0.34	-0.15	51%	31%
3	LSULSU5-2SEC · 5-2	▲6	Compare	+26.8	+22.2▲ 4.6	+48.1#2	+11.4#16	+17.0#1	-1.5#135	-0.1#29	0.28	-0.18	53%	28%
4	OSUOhio State6-1Big Ten · 6-1	–	Compare	+26.7	+25.1▲ 1.6	+44.0#4	+13.1#8	+12.9#9	+0.3#65	+0.4#8	0.33	-0.13	54%	33%
5	UGAGeorgia6-1SEC · 6-1	▼2	Compare	+26.0	+28.6▼ 2.6	+43.0#5	+16.6#2	+8.8#22	+0.2#66	+0.3#11	0.39	-0.03	56%	34%
6	BYUBYU6-0Big 12 · 6-0	▲1	Compare	+25.6	+23.2▲ 2.4	+40.8#7	+12.9#9	+11.2#14	+0.6#40	+0.8#1	0.34	-0.09	51%	33%
7	MIAMiami6-0ACC · 6-0	▼2	Compare	+24.5	+24.7▼ 0.2	+40.8#8	+15.8#4	+8.3#23	-0.1#89	+0.5#6	0.40	-0.05	53%	37%
8	IUIndiana6-1Big Ten · 6-1	▼2	Compare	+23.9	+23.2▲ 0.7	+41.6#6	+11.8#14	+12.8#11	-1.1#129	+0.3#10	0.37	-0.11	47%	32%
9	TENNTennessee6-1SEC · 6-1	▲12	Compare	+22.0	+17.0▲ 5.0	+35.0#10	+7.3#32	+13.4#7	+0.9#26	+0.3#12	0.24	-0.16	47%	35%
10	MISSOle Miss5-1SEC · 5-1	▲10	Compare	+21.8	+17.2▲ 4.6	+35.0#11	+17.1#1	+3.6#54	+0.6#42	+0.5#5	0.41	0.05	55%	39%
11	UTAHUtah6-0Big 12 · 6-0	▼3	Compare	+21.2	+22.6▼ 1.4	+35.1#9	+12.8#11	+7.9#26	+0.1#80	+0.4#7	0.34	-0.02	52%	35%
12	TTUTexas Tech6-0Big 12 · 6-0	▲2	Compare	+20.8	+19.3▲ 1.5	+31.3#15	+6.6#39	+11.9#12	+1.7#7	+0.5#4	0.21	-0.11	49%	34%
13	HOUHouston6-1Big 12 · 6-1	▼2	Compare	+20.1	+20.0▲ 0.1	+33.0#12	+15.4#5	+4.1#46	+0.3#64	+0.4#9	0.36	0.05	56%	38%
14	TEXTexas4-2SEC · 4-2	▼2	Compare	+19.7	+19.5▲ 0.2	+32.8#14	+4.9#48	+14.5#3	+0.2#68	+0.1#19	0.18	-0.13	47%	29%
15	FLAFlorida5-2SEC · 5-2	▲4	Compare	+19.3	+17.3▲ 2.0	+29.1#19	+11.8#15	+5.4#39	+2.0#4	+0.1#21	0.32	-0.00	51%	39%
16	UCLAUCLA6-0Big Ten · 6-0	▼3	Compare	+19.3	+19.5▼ 0.2	+32.8#13	+8.0#27	+11.4#13	-0.7#121	+0.5#3	0.25	-0.11	48%	35%
17	WAKEWake Forest6-1ACC · 6-1	▲8	Compare	+19.0	+15.7▲ 3.3	+30.4#18	+10.6#19	+7.3#31	+0.9#28	+0.2#16	0.31	-0.03	49%	38%
18	UKKentucky6-1SEC · 6-1	–	Compare	+18.8	+17.4▲ 1.4	+30.5#17	+10.6#20	+7.5#29	+0.1#81	+0.7#2	0.27	-0.06	52%	39%
19	OREOregon4-2Big Ten · 4-2	▲4	Compare	+18.3	+16.4▲ 1.9	+28.5#22	+2.6#64	+14.2#5	+1.6#12	-0.1#30	0.16	-0.14	43%	31%
20	NEBNebraska5-2Big Ten · 5-2	▼3	Compare	+17.7	+17.5▲ 0.2	+30.6#16	+8.8#25	+9.3#20	0.0#88	-0.3#39	0.29	-0.04	47%	34%
21	USCUSC6-1Big Ten · 6-1	▲3	Compare	+17.5	+15.9▲ 1.6	+28.1#23	+14.6#6	+1.9#71	+0.9#27	0.0#22	0.38	0.09	52%	40%
22	IOWAIowa5-1Big Ten · 5-1	–	Compare	+17.4	+16.7▲ 0.7	+27.3#24	+8.4#26	+7.7#28	+1.1#21	+0.2#17	0.27	-0.01	48%	35%
23	MIZMissouri5-2SEC · 5-2	▼13	Compare	+17.2	+20.5▼ 3.3	+28.9#20	+4.2#54	+12.8#10	+0.2#72	0.0#25	0.21	-0.10	43%	30%
24	OUOklahoma3-3SEC · 3-3	▼9	Compare	+17.0	+18.7▼ 1.7	+25.8#27	+0.3#84	+14.9#2	+2.2#2	-0.5#46	0.10	-0.15	43%	31%
25	NUNorthwestern5-1Big Ten · 5-1	▲2	Compare	+16.7	+15.5▲ 1.2	+27.1#25	+13.8#7	+2.2#67	+0.6#45	+0.1#18	0.35	0.04	53%	43%
26	ARIZArizona5-1Big 12 · 5-1	–	Compare	+16.6	+15.5▲ 1.1	+28.8#21	+7.3#31	+9.7#18	-0.4#115	0.0#26	0.23	-0.07	48%	35%
27	MSSTMississippi State4-2SEC · 4-2	▼11	Compare	+15.0	+18.4▼ 3.4	+25.5#28	+12.0#12	+3.1#59	-0.2#99	+0.1#20	0.30	0.04	53%	41%
28	AUBAuburn4-2SEC · 4-2	▲9	Compare	+14.9	+11.8▲ 3.1	+24.4#30	+5.0#46	+9.4#19	+0.5#53	0.0#24	0.21	-0.08	45%	37%
29	TCUTCU3-3Big 12 · 3-3	▲10	Compare	+14.8	+11.2▲ 3.6	+24.6#29	+1.5#77	+13.1#8	+1.0#23	-0.7#63	0.14	-0.12	43%	32%
30	LOULouisville4-3ACC · 4-3	▲4	Compare	+14.6	+12.5▲ 2.1	+26.4#26	+9.9#21	+5.7#37	-0.3#110	-0.7#64	0.30	0.01	48%	38%
31	BOISBoise State5-1Pac-12 · 5-1	▼1	Compare	+13.8	+13.2▲ 0.6	+23.2#31	+11.2#18	+2.5#63	+0.2#73	0.0#27	0.33	0.08	49%	39%
32	TA&MTexas A&M4-3SEC · 4-3	–	Compare	+13.7	+13.0▲ 0.7	+20.4#34	+4.0#58	+8.1#24	+2.3#1	-0.6#56	0.18	-0.03	45%	35%
33	MICHMichigan4-2Big Ten · 4-2	▼2	Compare	+12.7	+13.2▼ 0.5	+21.6#32	+2.7#61	+10.1#16	+0.4#54	-0.5#44	0.16	-0.08	44%	35%
34	WISWisconsin4-2Big Ten · 4-2	▲2	Compare	+12.5	+12.1▲ 0.4	+21.2#33	+2.6#66	+9.9#17	+0.2#69	-0.2#32	0.18	-0.06	42%	34%
35	SCSouth Carolina3-3SEC · 3-3	▼2	Compare	+12.4	+12.7▼ 0.3	+19.3#36	+6.8#35	+4.6#43	+1.6#11	-0.6#48	0.24	0.05	46%	37%
36	BAYBaylor4-2Big 12 · 4-2	▼8	Compare	+12.4	+13.7▼ 1.3	+19.2#37	+3.3#60	+8.0#25	+1.5#14	-0.5#43	0.20	-0.03	42%	36%
37	UCFUCF3-3Big 12 · 3-3	▲3	Compare	+11.9	+10.9▲ 1.0	+18.5#41	+2.0#73	+8.9#21	+1.7#8	-0.7#61	0.14	-0.06	44%	36%
38	UNCNorth Carolina4-2ACC · 4-2	▲3	Compare	+11.6	+10.2▲ 1.4	+20.1#35	+6.6#38	+5.2#40	-0.1#93	-0.1#31	0.20	-0.01	50%	41%
39	KSUKansas State4-2Big 12 · 4-2	▲9	Compare	+11.6	+8.5▲ 3.1	+17.8#42	+7.0#34	+3.5#56	+1.6#10	-0.5#47	0.23	0.07	48%	37%
40	OKSTOklahoma State4-2Big 12 · 4-2	▲4	Compare	+11.3	+8.9▲ 2.4	+18.8#40	+7.3#30	+3.8#52	+0.5#49	-0.3#36	0.20	0.04	51%	39%
41	PITTPittsburgh5-2ACC · 5-2	▼6	Compare	+11.1	+12.2▼ 1.1	+16.5#46	+2.4#67	+7.4#30	+1.9#6	-0.6#49	0.16	-0.00	43%	35%
42	ORSTOregon State5-2Pac-12 · 5-2	▼4	Compare	+10.6	+11.5▼ 0.9	+19.0#39	+9.1#23	+2.2#68	-0.2#108	-0.5#42	0.29	0.08	47%	40%
43	SMUSMU5-1ACC · 5-1	–	Compare	+10.5	+9.6▲ 0.9	+17.2#44	+6.3#40	+3.8#51	+0.4#57	-0.1#28	0.21	0.05	48%	38%
44	KUKansas2-4Big 12 · 2-4	▼15	Compare	+10.2	+13.5▼ 3.3	+19.1#38	+4.3#51	+6.9#34	+0.2#70	-1.3#100	0.19	0.00	45%	36%
45	JMUJames Madison7-0Sun Belt · 7-0	▼3	Compare	+9.7	+9.7no change	+12.5#51	+4.9#47	+2.5#64	+2.0#5	+0.3#14	0.21	0.06	44%	41%
46	UNTNorth Texas4-2American · 4-2	▲3	Compare	+9.4	+7.8▲ 1.6	+16.5#45	+11.9#13	-2.1#101	+0.1#78	-0.4#41	0.35	0.13	48%	45%
47	COLOColorado2-4Big 12 · 2-4	▲10	Compare	+8.0	+5.3▲ 2.7	+17.4#43	-0.1#87	+10.4#15	-1.2#132	-1.1#86	0.10	-0.07	43%	34%
48	WASHWashington4-3Big Ten · 4-3	▲18	Compare	+7.8	+4.2▲ 3.6	+14.2#49	+2.7#62	+5.7#38	+0.4#60	-0.9#72	0.16	-0.01	44%	40%
49	TXSTTexas State3-3Pac-12 · 3-3	▲9	Compare	+7.7	+5.3▲ 2.4	+16.5#47	+11.3#17	-1.5#94	-1.1#130	-1.0#81	0.32	0.13	49%	44%
50	FSUFlorida State3-4ACC · 3-4	▲5	Compare	+7.3	+5.8▲ 1.5	+12.8#50	+7.9#28	-0.4#84	+0.6#37	-0.9#74	0.27	0.14	46%	40%
51	PSUPenn State3-4Big Ten · 3-4	–	Compare	+7.1	+6.7▲ 0.4	+14.4#48	+2.4#68	+6.1#35	-0.1#96	-1.3#96	0.17	0.00	42%	37%
52	UVAVirginia4-3ACC · 4-3	▼2	Compare	+6.7	+7.1▼ 0.4	+12.4#52	+4.3#53	+3.1#58	+0.4#55	-1.1#85	0.18	0.06	45%	39%
53	CINCincinnati4-2Big 12 · 4-2	▲3	Compare	+6.5	+5.4▲ 1.1	+11.0#55	+9.5#22	-3.0#107	+0.6#41	-0.6#50	0.31	0.16	46%	44%
54	UNMNew Mexico5-1Mountain West · 5-1	▼9	Compare	+6.5	+8.7▼ 2.2	+10.5#56	-0.9#92	+7.1#32	+0.5#46	-0.2#34	0.11	-0.02	40%	37%
55	ISUIowa State3-3Big 12 · 3-3	▼3	Compare	+6.5	+6.5no change	+11.2#54	+1.9#75	+4.7#42	+0.5#48	-0.7#62	0.16	0.03	42%	39%
56	LTLouisiana Tech4-2Sun Belt · 4-2	▲6	Compare	+6.5	+4.9▲ 1.6	+11.3#53	+1.7#76	+5.0#41	+0.1#75	-0.4#40	0.15	0.04	42%	37%
57	VTVirginia Tech5-2ACC · 5-2	▼10	Compare	+6.4	+8.7▼ 2.3	+9.8#58	+6.7#37	-0.9#85	+1.3#19	-0.7#60	0.23	0.15	47%	41%
58	PURPurdue3-4Big Ten · 3-4	▼12	Compare	+5.6	+8.7▼ 3.1	+8.9#60	+7.1#33	-1.8#98	+1.4#17	-1.0#78	0.25	0.15	46%	43%
59	UTSAUTSA6-1American · 6-1	▼6	Compare	+5.5	+6.2▼ 0.7	+9.4#59	+4.0#57	+1.6#74	0.0#86	0.0#23	0.19	0.09	44%	41%
60	CLEMClemson4-2ACC · 4-2	▼1	Compare	+5.5	+5.3▲ 0.2	+7.9#65	-3.1#103	+7.8#27	+1.1#22	-0.2#33	0.06	-0.04	40%	37%
61	GASTGeorgia State4-2Sun Belt · 4-2	–	Compare	+4.9	+5.2▼ 0.3	+8.1#64	+5.8#41	-1.0#86	+0.7#36	-0.6#54	0.21	0.14	47%	42%
62	DUKEDuke4-2ACC · 4-2	▲5	Compare	+4.5	+4.1▲ 0.4	+8.6#62	+2.6#65	+2.5#65	+0.1#77	-0.7#59	0.19	0.06	41%	40%
63	ARKArkansas3-4SEC · 3-4	▲12	Compare	+4.3	+2.6▲ 1.7	+8.8#61	+4.3#52	+0.9#79	0.0#85	-0.9#71	0.17	0.11	47%	40%
64	LIBLiberty5-1CUSA · 5-1	▲1	Compare	+4.2	+4.2no change	+7.6#68	+2.3#69	+2.2#69	0.0#84	-0.3#35	0.12	0.09	47%	39%
65	NDSUNorth Dakota State6-1Mountain West · 6-1	▼5	Compare	+4.1	+5.2▼ 1.1	+7.0#71	-3.0#101	+7.1#33	+0.3#62	-0.3#37	0.07	-0.04	39%	39%
66	VANVanderbilt3-4SEC · 3-4	▼12	Compare	+4.1	+6.0▼ 1.9	+7.6#67	+1.0#80	+3.5#55	+0.7#34	-1.1#87	0.14	0.04	42%	40%
67	NCSUNC State3-3ACC · 3-3	▲4	Compare	+3.8	+3.1▲ 0.7	+6.6#72	+5.3#43	-1.4#92	+0.8#33	-0.9#75	0.22	0.14	45%	42%
68	MINNMinnesota4-2Big Ten · 4-2	▼4	Compare	+3.7	+4.6▼ 0.9	+3.5#80	-1.8#96	+3.9#49	+2.1#3	-0.5#45	0.07	0.04	41%	40%
69	MEMMemphis5-2American · 5-2	▼6	Compare	+3.7	+4.7▼ 1.0	+8.6#63	+4.1#56	+1.0#78	-0.7#122	-0.7#57	0.16	0.11	47%	40%
70	MSUMichigan State2-5Big Ten · 2-5	▼1	Compare	+3.7	+3.7no change	+6.6#73	+0.8#83	+3.2#57	+1.3#20	-1.5#111	0.08	0.07	46%	39%
71	NAVYNavy2-4American · 2-4	▲6	Compare	+3.7	+2.0▲ 1.7	+10.4#57	+4.5#49	+1.7#72	-0.8#124	-1.7#117	0.18	0.13	46%	37%
72	ILLIllinois3-3Big Ten · 3-3	▲1	Compare	+2.9	+3.0▼ 0.1	+5.4#75	+8.9#24	-5.7#122	+0.6#43	-0.9#73	0.26	0.24	50%	44%
73	TOLToledo5-2MAC · 5-2	▲12	Compare	+2.8	0.0▲ 2.8	+7.2#70	+0.1#85	+4.1#45	-0.6#119	-0.8#70	0.13	0.05	41%	38%
74	ARMYArmy4-2American · 4-2	▲4	Compare	+2.8	+1.4▲ 1.4	+5.1#78	+7.7#29	-4.7#115	+0.5#47	-0.8#66	0.24	0.19	49%	46%
75	AFAir Force5-1Mountain West · 5-1	▲1	Compare	+2.6	+2.1▲ 0.5	+6.0#74	+5.0#45	-1.5#93	-0.6#118	-0.3#38	0.18	0.15	47%	42%
76	GTGeorgia Tech2-4ACC · 2-4	▲5	Compare	+2.6	+0.8▲ 1.8	+7.5#69	+6.8#36	-2.4#103	-0.4#113	-1.5#110	0.24	0.17	47%	43%
77	ULLouisiana5-2Sun Belt · 5-2	▲10	Compare	+2.4	-0.5▲ 2.9	+5.3#77	-1.3#94	+4.4#44	-0.2#106	-0.6#51	0.09	0.01	41%	41%
78	TLSATulsa4-3American · 4-3	▲6	Compare	+2.2	+0.1▲ 2.1	+5.4#76	-0.8#90	+4.0#48	+0.1#76	-1.1#83	0.12	0.04	40%	39%
79	GASOGeorgia Southern3-4Sun Belt · 3-4	▲9	Compare	+1.6	-0.6▲ 2.2	+7.8#66	+3.7#59	+0.8#80	-1.4#133	-1.5#112	0.17	0.11	45%	40%
80	FRESFresno State4-3Pac-12 · 4-3	▼6	Compare	+0.6	+2.6▼ 2.0	+1.0#83	-1.1#93	+1.6#73	+1.0#24	-1.0#79	0.10	0.06	41%	43%
81	ASUArizona State3-3Big 12 · 3-3	▼11	Compare	+0.5	+3.2▼ 2.7	+4.0#79	+1.0#79	+1.3#77	-1.1#131	-0.8#68	0.10	0.09	46%	41%
82	SYRSyracuse2-4ACC · 2-4	▼3	Compare	-0.1	+1.1▼ 1.2	+2.6#81	-0.9#91	+2.4#66	-0.2#105	-1.5#109	0.07	0.06	44%	41%
83	USFSouth Florida5-2American · 5-2	▼1	Compare	-0.1	+0.7▼ 0.8	-0.3#85	0.0#86	-0.2#81	+0.8#32	-0.8#67	0.10	0.08	43%	45%
84	JXSTJacksonville State5-2CUSA · 5-2	▼1	Compare	-0.4	+0.2▼ 0.6	-0.8#89	+2.0#74	-2.4#104	+0.8#30	-0.7#65	0.13	0.15	45%	44%
85	ECUEast Carolina3-3American · 3-3	▼17	Compare	-0.5	+3.9▼ 4.4	+0.2#84	-3.9#106	+4.0#47	+0.4#56	-1.0#82	0.05	0.06	38%	37%
86	CONNUConn3-3Independents · 3-3	▼6	Compare	-0.6	+1.0▼ 1.6	-0.4#87	+2.2#70	-2.5#105	+1.0#25	-1.3#102	0.17	0.14	42%	45%
87	OHIOOhio5-2MAC · 5-2	▲6	Compare	-0.6	-2.8▲ 2.2	-0.3#86	+2.6#63	-2.8#106	+0.2#71	-0.7#58	0.14	0.17	45%	43%
88	MDMaryland2-5Big Ten · 2-5	▼16	Compare	-1.1	+3.1▼ 4.2	+1.3#82	-2.1#98	+2.9#62	-0.3#111	-1.6#113	0.07	0.05	40%	41%
89	WMUWestern Michigan5-2MAC · 5-2	–	Compare	-1.1	-1.3▲ 0.2	-1.9#90	+0.8#82	-1.9#99	+0.6#38	-0.6#55	0.12	0.13	43%	45%
90	FAUFlorida Atlantic4-2American · 4-2	▼4	Compare	-1.2	-0.2▼ 1.0	-2.2#91	+4.2#55	-5.5#118	+0.6#39	-0.6#52	0.17	0.25	46%	42%
91	RUTGRutgers2-4Big Ten · 2-4	▲4	Compare	-1.4	-4.3▲ 2.9	-0.7#88	+5.5#42	-5.9#124	+0.5#51	-1.5#108	0.20	0.21	47%	47%
92	WVUWest Virginia4-3Big 12 · 4-3	▼1	Compare	-2.3	-1.9▼ 0.4	-2.2#92	+4.4#50	-5.7#119	0.0#87	-0.9#76	0.20	0.22	44%	46%
93	UNLVUNLV4-3Mountain West · 4-3	▼1	Compare	-2.9	-2.4▼ 0.5	-2.8#94	-3.0#102	+1.3#76	-0.1#90	-1.1#89	0.08	0.09	38%	41%
94	TULNTulane3-3American · 3-3	▲9	Compare	-3.1	-6.0▲ 2.9	-4.2#95	-6.1#123	+3.6#53	+0.5#52	-1.1#84	0.05	0.04	34%	40%
95	BCBoston College3-3ACC · 3-3	▲5	Compare	-4.0	-5.0▲ 1.0	-2.6#93	-5.4#116	+3.8#50	-1.5#134	-1.0#80	0.01	0.03	39%	40%
96	ARSTArkansas State3-4Sun Belt · 3-4	▲11	Compare	-4.2	-6.7▲ 2.5	-4.2#96	+1.2#78	-3.7#110	-0.2#103	-1.6#114	0.10	0.17	46%	45%
97	UABUAB4-3American · 4-3	▲15	Compare	-4.6	-7.5▲ 2.9	-8.8#106	-5.0#111	-0.2#82	+1.7#9	-1.1#91	-0.01	0.09	41%	44%
98	M-OHMiami (OH)4-3MAC · 4-3	–	Compare	-4.8	-4.5▼ 0.3	-6.2#98	-2.3#99	-1.4#91	0.0#82	-1.1#90	0.10	0.14	38%	43%
99	TROYTroy3-3Sun Belt · 3-3	▼5	Compare	-5.2	-2.9▼ 2.3	-6.2#99	-0.4#89	-3.3#109	-0.5#116	-1.1#88	0.09	0.17	43%	45%
100	WSUWashington State1-6Pac-12 · 1-6	▲13	Compare	-5.4	-7.6▲ 2.2	-5.1#97	-5.0#113	+2.0#70	-0.1#92	-2.3#130	0.04	0.07	37%	41%
101	MASSMassachusetts4-3MAC · 4-3	▼5	Compare	-5.6	-4.4▼ 1.2	-9.6#108	-4.4#107	-1.3#88	+1.4#16	-1.4#105	0.02	0.12	40%	44%
102	SDSUSan Diego State3-4Pac-12 · 3-4	▲14	Compare	-5.8	-8.0▲ 2.2	-9.8#109	-7.2#126	+1.4#75	+1.3#18	-1.3#98	-0.00	0.04	35%	45%
103	CALCalifornia3-4ACC · 3-4	▼13	Compare	-5.9	-1.4▼ 4.5	-7.1#101	-3.8#105	-0.4#83	-0.3#112	-1.4#104	0.04	0.15	40%	40%
104	FIUFlorida International3-3CUSA · 3-3	–	Compare	-5.9	-6.0▲ 0.1	-7.5#104	-7.5#128	+3.1#60	-0.2#98	-1.3#99	-0.03	0.07	37%	39%
105	USUUtah State2-4Pac-12 · 2-4	▼3	Compare	-5.9	-5.9no change	-7.4#103	-7.4#127	+3.0#61	-0.2#104	-1.4#103	-0.02	0.06	36%	39%
106	CSUColorado State2-4Pac-12 · 2-4	▼9	Compare	-5.9	-4.4▼ 1.5	-7.4#102	+5.1#44	-9.4#136	-0.2#107	-1.4#106	0.22	0.26	44%	51%
107	KENNKennesaw State1-5CUSA · 1-5	▼2	Compare	-6.0	-6.0no change	-6.4#100	-2.1#97	-1.7#97	-0.1#91	-2.1#125	0.07	0.15	41%	43%
108	APPApp State4-2Sun Belt · 4-2	▼2	Compare	-6.1	-6.4▲ 0.3	-9.6#107	-1.8#95	-3.9#111	+0.3#61	-0.8#69	0.08	0.16	40%	47%
109	STANStanford3-4ACC · 3-4	–	Compare	-6.7	-7.3▲ 0.6	-10.0#110	-0.2#88	-5.7#121	+0.1#74	-0.9#77	0.13	0.23	40%	45%
110	TEMTemple2-5American · 2-5	▼11	Compare	-6.8	-5.0▼ 1.8	-8.0#105	+2.1#72	-6.8#128	+0.1#79	-2.2#128	0.17	0.23	41%	47%
111	NEVNevada2-4Mountain West · 2-4	–	Compare	-7.4	-7.4no change	-12.1#112	-5.4#117	-1.7#96	+1.5#13	-1.8#122	0.02	0.17	37%	41%
112	USASouth Alabama4-2Sun Belt · 4-2	▲5	Compare	-8.1	-9.0▲ 0.9	-12.4#117	+2.1#71	-9.4#135	-0.1#95	-0.6#53	0.18	0.27	41%	49%
113	WKUWestern Kentucky3-4CUSA · 3-4	▲7	Compare	-8.2	-10.0▲ 1.8	-12.3#116	-6.0#121	-1.2#87	+0.4#58	-1.3#97	0.01	0.15	37%	41%
114	DELDelaware2-4CUSA · 2-4	–	Compare	-9.0	-7.7▼ 1.3	-12.1#113	-2.9#100	-4.3#113	-0.2#101	-1.7#118	0.07	0.20	39%	44%
115	ODUOld Dominion2-5Sun Belt · 2-5	▼14	Compare	-9.4	-5.6▼ 3.8	-12.2#114	-13.2#138	+6.0#36	-0.1#94	-2.1#126	-0.12	-0.01	31%	38%
116	SHSUSam Houston1-5CUSA · 1-5	▼8	Compare	-9.4	-7.0▼ 2.4	-12.3#115	-6.0#119	-1.3#90	-0.1#97	-2.0#123	-0.02	0.15	40%	41%
117	RICERice1-6American · 1-6	▼7	Compare	-9.5	-7.4▼ 2.1	-10.7#111	-5.0#112	-1.3#89	-0.8#125	-2.3#132	0.01	0.14	39%	42%
118	SJSUSan José State4-3Mountain West · 4-3	▲1	Compare	-9.9	-9.4▼ 0.5	-14.3#118	-6.1#124	-2.3#102	-0.2#109	-1.2#92	0.02	0.15	36%	44%
119	CCUCoastal Carolina2-5Sun Belt · 2-5	▼4	Compare	-9.9	-8.0▼ 1.9	-15.4#120	-4.7#110	-4.3#114	+1.5#15	-2.3#129	0.04	0.17	37%	47%
120	WYOWyoming4-3Mountain West · 4-3	▲4	Compare	-11.1	-11.7▲ 0.6	-17.7#122	-4.6#108	-5.8#123	+0.7#35	-1.3#101	0.01	0.20	41%	47%
121	MTSUMiddle Tennessee3-3CUSA · 3-3	▲1	Compare	-11.8	-11.6▼ 0.2	-18.7#125	-5.3#115	-5.7#120	+0.5#50	-1.2#95	0.02	0.20	38%	47%
122	USMSouthern Miss1-5Sun Belt · 1-5	▼4	Compare	-11.8	-9.0▼ 2.8	-14.8#119	-4.6#109	-4.1#112	-0.9#126	-2.2#127	0.02	0.20	40%	44%
123	NMSUNew Mexico State2-4CUSA · 2-4	▲2	Compare	-12.5	-12.7▲ 0.2	-16.5#121	-7.8#130	-1.9#100	-1.0#128	-1.7#119	-0.05	0.14	38%	44%
124	MRSHMarshall3-3Sun Belt · 3-3	▼1	Compare	-12.5	-11.6▼ 0.9	-18.3#123	+0.8#81	-11.7#138	-0.4#114	-1.2#93	0.13	0.34	43%	48%
125	BUFBuffalo4-3MAC · 4-3	▲1	Compare	-12.5	-13.3▲ 0.8	-19.7#126	-8.4#131	-3.3#108	+0.3#63	-1.2#94	-0.02	0.19	34%	42%
126	BALLBall State2-5MAC · 2-5	▲5	Compare	-12.8	-15.0▲ 2.2	-18.4#124	-3.4#104	-7.5#130	-0.2#100	-1.8#120	0.07	0.28	38%	44%
127	EMUEastern Michigan4-4MAC · 4-4	▼6	Compare	-13.0	-10.1▼ 2.9	-20.3#128	-6.0#122	-6.0#125	+0.6#44	-1.6#116	-0.00	0.22	38%	46%
128	MOSTMissouri State2-4CUSA · 2-4	▲1	Compare	-14.2	-14.4▲ 0.2	-20.2#127	-5.5#118	-6.4#126	-0.7#120	-1.6#115	0.01	0.22	39%	48%
129	KENTKent State2-5MAC · 2-5	▲3	Compare	-14.9	-15.2▲ 0.3	-20.8#129	-10.6#137	-1.7#95	-0.7#123	-1.8#121	-0.07	0.13	33%	45%
130	HAWHawai'i1-6Mountain West · 1-6	–	Compare	-14.9	-15.0▲ 0.1	-21.2#130	-6.0#120	-6.5#127	+0.4#59	-2.8#137	-0.00	0.23	38%	47%
131	CMUCentral Michigan3-4MAC · 3-4	▼4	Compare	-15.5	-13.5▼ 2.0	-23.4#132	-6.3#125	-7.6#132	-0.2#102	-1.5#107	0.01	0.24	37%	48%
132	AKRAkron1-6MAC · 1-6	▲2	Compare	-17.5	-15.7▼ 1.8	-22.6#131	-5.2#114	-8.1#134	-1.6#136	-2.6#135	0.01	0.27	39%	47%
133	CLTCharlotte1-6American · 1-6	▲4	Compare	-17.5	-20.6▲ 3.1	-25.5#135	-9.7#134	-5.4#117	0.0#83	-2.4#134	-0.07	0.20	35%	47%
134	BGSUBowling Green2-5MAC · 2-5	▼6	Compare	-17.5	-14.2▼ 3.3	-24.5#133	-9.5#133	-4.9#116	-1.0#127	-2.1#124	-0.09	0.17	38%	48%
135	NIUNorthern Illinois0-6Mountain West · 0-6	–	Compare	-17.7	-16.0▼ 1.7	-25.2#134	-7.5#129	-7.3#129	-0.5#117	-2.4#133	-0.05	0.24	38%	48%
136	SACSacramento State1-6MAC · 1-6	▼3	Compare	-20.1	-15.3▼ 4.8	-30.7#137	-10.6#136	-7.5#131	+0.8#31	-2.8#138	-0.10	0.28	37%	44%
137	ULMUL Monroe0-6Sun Belt · 0-6	▼1	Compare	-21.5	-20.4▼ 1.1	-28.8#136	-9.2#132	-7.8#133	-1.9#138	-2.6#136	-0.09	0.25	39%	48%
138	UTEPUTEP1-6Mountain West · 1-6	–	Compare	-23.6	-22.1▼ 1.5	-33.3#138	-9.9#135	-9.8#137	-1.6#137	-2.3#131	-0.07	0.27	35%	50%

Tap a column name to sort. Small numbers next to each value are that team's national rank.

How to read the rating

+30.6 means about 30 points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field. Compare two teams' ratings to see who the computer thinks is better, and by about how much. Last Wk shows last week's rating, so you can tell whether a team actually improved or just passed a team that dropped.

Offense + defense + special teams + record

Each part is in points per game versus average, so they add up to the Power rating. A big defense number means opponents score far less than usual against them. Record (how impressive the record is for its schedule) gets only a small say, because in testing more weight made the rating worse at telling who's better.

Why it can differ from the résumé

A team can play great and still lose close games, or win ugly against a soft schedule. The Power Rankings judge how good a team is; the Résumé Rankings judge what it has earned.