College Football · 2026 · Week 6

StatboyPower Rankings.

What it's based on

Who is the best team right now?

How well each team plays on every snap, not its record. The computer measures offense and defense play by play (points added per play and success rate), adjusts every number for the quality of the opponent and its conference, and adds special teams (field goals and punting) plus a small credit for Record Strength. Blowout garbage time is thrown out. Last season's numbers count a little early in the year and are gone by Week 8.

Points added per play
Success rate
Opponent adjusted
Special teams
Record Strength
No garbage time

100% computer. No human votes or hand adjustments. Results through games of October 10. Updated every morning.

Share this graphicPreview ↗Graphic shows:Top 10 · Week 6 · Instagram-ready image

	Team	Move	Compare		Last Wk
1	ALAAlabama5-1SEC · 5-1	–	Compare	+31.3	+31.1▲ 0.2	+51.6#2	+15.0#5	+15.2#3	+0.6#43	+0.6#2	0.39	-0.16	53%	30%
2	NDNotre Dame6-0Independents · 6-0	▲1	Compare	+30.6	+27.6▲ 3.0	+51.7#1	+15.7#3	+14.5#4	-0.1#91	+0.5#3	0.39	-0.15	54%	31%
3	UGAGeorgia6-0SEC · 6-0	▼1	Compare	+28.6	+27.6▲ 1.0	+47.0#3	+16.9#2	+10.5#13	+0.4#59	+0.8#1	0.40	-0.08	56%	33%
4	OSUOhio State5-1Big Ten · 5-1	–	Compare	+25.1	+24.0▲ 1.1	+42.8#4	+13.6#8	+11.3#9	0.0#82	+0.1#19	0.33	-0.10	54%	34%
5	MIAMiami5-0ACC · 5-0	–	Compare	+24.7	+24.0▲ 0.7	+41.4#6	+17.5#1	+6.7#33	+0.1#73	+0.4#10	0.43	-0.03	55%	39%
6	IUIndiana6-0Big Ten · 6-0	–	Compare	+23.2	+22.2▲ 1.0	+39.9#7	+11.5#12	+11.8#8	-0.6#119	+0.5#4	0.36	-0.10	46%	33%
7	BYUBYU5-0Big 12 · 5-0	▲1	Compare	+23.2	+21.7▲ 1.5	+37.6#9	+11.1#15	+10.8#12	+0.8#34	+0.5#8	0.31	-0.10	50%	35%
8	UTAHUtah5-0Big 12 · 5-0	▲3	Compare	+22.6	+21.2▲ 1.4	+37.9#8	+13.9#7	+8.3#21	+0.1#77	+0.3#12	0.35	-0.04	53%	35%
9	LSULSU4-2SEC · 4-2	▼2	Compare	+22.2	+22.0▲ 0.2	+41.5#5	+8.8#22	+15.4#2	-1.7#137	-0.3#40	0.24	-0.14	51%	27%
10	MIZMissouri5-1SEC · 5-1	▼1	Compare	+20.5	+21.5▼ 1.0	+33.6#11	+6.0#37	+13.7#5	+0.6#49	+0.3#13	0.23	-0.13	45%	30%
11	HOUHouston5-1Big 12 · 5-1	▲6	Compare	+20.0	+17.5▲ 2.5	+33.2#12	+14.4#6	+5.0#39	+0.4#57	+0.2#16	0.34	0.03	55%	37%
12	TEXTexas4-1SEC · 4-1	▼2	Compare	+19.5	+21.2▼ 1.7	+33.2#13	+5.8#40	+13.6#6	-0.2#99	+0.4#9	0.20	-0.12	48%	30%
13	UCLAUCLA5-0Big Ten · 5-0	▲7	Compare	+19.5	+16.2▲ 3.3	+33.7#10	+7.7#29	+12.0#7	-0.7#122	+0.5#7	0.24	-0.12	49%	34%
14	TTUTexas Tech5-0Big 12 · 5-0	▼1	Compare	+19.3	+19.2▲ 0.1	+29.3#16	+5.9#39	+11.2#11	+1.6#10	+0.5#5	0.20	-0.10	48%	34%
15	OUOklahoma3-2SEC · 3-2	▲3	Compare	+18.7	+17.0▲ 1.7	+28.4#19	+1.1#83	+15.5#1	+2.2#4	-0.1#30	0.11	-0.17	44%	30%
16	MSSTMississippi State4-1SEC · 4-1	▼1	Compare	+18.4	+18.2▲ 0.2	+31.2#14	+12.6#11	+5.6#37	-0.1#94	+0.4#11	0.32	0.00	53%	38%
17	NEBNebraska5-1Big Ten · 5-1	▲2	Compare	+17.5	+16.5▲ 1.0	+30.0#15	+9.8#18	+7.7#28	0.0#81	-0.1#27	0.30	-0.01	48%	34%
18	UKKentucky5-1SEC · 5-1	▲3	Compare	+17.4	+15.8▲ 1.6	+28.6#17	+9.9#17	+6.8#32	+0.2#72	+0.5#6	0.25	-0.05	53%	40%
19	FLAFlorida4-2SEC · 4-2	▼7	Compare	+17.3	+20.4▼ 3.1	+25.8#24	+11.4#14	+3.7#51	+2.4#2	-0.2#35	0.30	0.04	51%	40%
20	MISSOle Miss4-1SEC · 4-1	▲5	Compare	+17.2	+14.6▲ 2.6	+28.4#18	+15.0#4	+1.6#73	+0.4#58	+0.3#14	0.36	0.07	55%	41%
21	TENNTennessee5-1SEC · 5-1	▼5	Compare	+17.0	+17.8▼ 0.8	+27.3#21	+5.9#38	+10.0#14	+1.0#27	0.0#21	0.23	-0.09	46%	36%
22	IOWAIowa5-1Big Ten · 5-1	▲8	Compare	+16.7	+13.6▲ 3.1	+26.5#22	+7.7#30	+7.8#27	+1.1#23	+0.2#18	0.25	-0.01	47%	34%
23	OREOregon3-2Big Ten · 3-2	▼9	Compare	+16.4	+18.8▼ 2.4	+26.1#23	+4.0#51	+11.2#10	+1.5#15	-0.3#44	0.20	-0.09	44%	33%
24	USCUSC6-1Big Ten · 6-1	–	Compare	+15.9	+14.9▲ 1.0	+25.6#25	+13.3#10	+1.6#74	+0.9#29	0.0#23	0.36	0.08	51%	40%
25	WAKEWake Forest5-1ACC · 5-1	▲1	Compare	+15.7	+14.4▲ 1.3	+24.8#27	+8.0#27	+6.5#35	+1.0#25	+0.2#15	0.26	-0.02	47%	38%
26	ARIZArizona5-1Big 12 · 5-1	▲5	Compare	+15.5	+13.3▲ 2.2	+27.4#20	+7.7#28	+8.3#22	-0.4#113	0.0#25	0.25	-0.04	48%	35%
27	NUNorthwestern4-1Big Ten · 4-1	▼4	Compare	+15.5	+15.0▲ 0.5	+25.1#26	+13.5#9	+1.1#76	+0.8#31	0.0#22	0.34	0.05	53%	44%
28	BAYBaylor4-1Big 12 · 4-1	–	Compare	+13.7	+13.9▼ 0.2	+20.8#33	+5.0#47	+7.2#31	+1.7#9	-0.1#31	0.21	-0.01	44%	36%
29	KUKansas2-3Big 12 · 2-3	▼7	Compare	+13.5	+15.4▼ 1.9	+24.3#28	+6.1#35	+8.1#23	+0.3#66	-0.9#81	0.23	-0.02	46%	34%
30	BOISBoise State5-1Pac-12 · 5-1	▲2	Compare	+13.2	+13.2no change	+22.4#30	+9.9#16	+3.2#55	+0.2#71	0.0#26	0.30	0.06	48%	39%
31	MICHMichigan3-2Big Ten · 3-2	▲3	Compare	+13.2	+12.8▲ 0.4	+22.4#31	+3.3#54	+9.8#16	+0.6#47	-0.5#54	0.17	-0.06	44%	34%
32	TA&MTexas A&M3-3SEC · 3-3	▲1	Compare	+13.0	+12.9▲ 0.1	+19.5#37	+3.5#53	+7.9#25	+2.2#3	-0.6#60	0.17	-0.03	44%	35%
33	SCSouth Carolina3-3SEC · 3-3	▲11	Compare	+12.7	+10.2▲ 2.5	+19.9#36	+6.7#32	+4.9#40	+1.6#12	-0.5#53	0.23	0.04	47%	36%
34	LOULouisville3-3ACC · 3-3	▲4	Compare	+12.5	+11.2▲ 1.3	+23.2#29	+9.2#20	+4.3#43	-0.1#93	-0.9#79	0.29	0.04	48%	38%
35	PITTPittsburgh5-1ACC · 5-1	▼8	Compare	+12.2	+14.1▼ 1.9	+17.8#40	+1.3#78	+9.1#18	+1.8#7	-0.1#28	0.15	-0.04	41%	33%
36	WISWisconsin4-1Big Ten · 4-1	–	Compare	+12.1	+11.8▲ 0.3	+19.9#35	+2.3#66	+9.3#17	+0.4#60	+0.1#20	0.17	-0.06	42%	35%
37	AUBAuburn3-2SEC · 3-2	▼8	Compare	+11.8	+13.8▼ 2.0	+20.5#34	+3.0#60	+9.0#19	+0.2#67	-0.3#46	0.16	-0.07	44%	36%
38	ORSTOregon State4-2Pac-12 · 4-2	▲9	Compare	+11.5	+8.8▲ 2.7	+21.5#32	+8.5#24	+4.0#47	-0.6#120	-0.5#50	0.26	0.04	48%	38%
39	TCUTCU2-3Big 12 · 2-3	▲2	Compare	+11.2	+10.3▲ 0.9	+18.9#38	+1.3#79	+9.8#15	+1.1#21	-0.9#83	0.14	-0.07	42%	35%
40	UCFUCF3-3Big 12 · 3-3	▼3	Compare	+10.9	+11.6▼ 0.7	+17.0#42	+2.1#71	+7.8#26	+1.7#8	-0.7#69	0.14	-0.04	44%	37%
41	UNCNorth Carolina3-2ACC · 3-2	▲9	Compare	+10.2	+7.8▲ 2.4	+18.4#39	+6.6#33	+4.1#45	-0.4#108	-0.2#38	0.19	0.00	50%	42%
42	JMUJames Madison6-0Sun Belt · 6-0	▼2	Compare	+9.7	+10.3▼ 0.6	+11.6#53	+4.3#49	+2.4#65	+2.8#1	+0.2#17	0.19	0.06	45%	40%
43	SMUSMU4-1ACC · 4-1	▼4	Compare	+9.6	+10.6▼ 1.0	+17.3#41	+6.2#34	+4.0#48	-0.4#110	-0.2#33	0.20	0.04	49%	38%
44	OKSTOklahoma State4-1Big 12 · 4-1	▲2	Compare	+8.9	+9.5▼ 0.6	+14.7#44	+5.2#45	+3.4#52	+0.4#55	-0.1#29	0.16	0.05	50%	39%
45	UNMNew Mexico4-1Mountain West · 4-1	▲3	Compare	+8.7	+8.3▲ 0.4	+15.0#43	+1.4#77	+7.4#30	+0.2#68	-0.2#36	0.14	-0.02	42%	36%
46	PURPurdue3-3Big Ten · 3-3	▲9	Compare	+8.7	+6.3▲ 2.4	+13.8#47	+9.5#19	-1.4#89	+1.2#18	-0.6#57	0.28	0.15	49%	42%
47	VTVirginia Tech4-2ACC · 4-2	▼5	Compare	+8.7	+10.2▼ 1.5	+14.1#45	+8.8#23	-0.5#85	+1.1#22	-0.7#64	0.26	0.13	49%	41%
48	KSUKansas State3-2Big 12 · 3-2	▼13	Compare	+8.5	+12.1▼ 3.6	+13.2#49	+6.1#36	+1.6#72	+1.5#14	-0.7#62	0.22	0.10	47%	39%
49	UNTNorth Texas4-2American · 4-2	▲7	Compare	+7.8	+6.0▲ 1.8	+13.9#46	+11.4#13	-3.2#107	+0.1#76	-0.5#51	0.34	0.14	48%	46%
50	UVAVirginia4-2ACC · 4-2	▲1	Compare	+7.1	+7.7▼ 0.6	+11.9#52	+4.1#50	+2.9#58	+0.8#32	-0.7#71	0.19	0.06	44%	39%
51	PSUPenn State3-3Big Ten · 3-3	▼6	Compare	+6.7	+9.7▼ 3.0	+13.6#48	+2.2#68	+5.7#36	-0.3#105	-0.9#84	0.18	0.01	41%	38%
52	ISUIowa State3-3Big 12 · 3-3	▲1	Compare	+6.5	+6.7▼ 0.2	+11.5#54	+2.7#62	+4.0#46	+0.5#54	-0.7#66	0.18	0.03	42%	39%
53	UTSAUTSA5-1American · 5-1	▲13	Compare	+6.2	+4.5▲ 1.7	+11.0#55	+3.6#52	+2.9#59	-0.2#103	0.0#24	0.18	0.05	44%	40%
54	VANVanderbilt3-3SEC · 3-3	▼11	Compare	+6.0	+10.2▼ 4.2	+10.5#56	+1.5#75	+4.6#42	+0.6#51	-0.7#68	0.16	0.02	41%	39%
55	FSUFlorida State3-3ACC · 3-3	▼6	Compare	+5.8	+8.0▼ 2.2	+10.3#57	+8.3#26	-2.3#100	+0.5#53	-0.7#70	0.27	0.17	47%	42%
56	CINCincinnati4-1Big 12 · 4-1	▲2	Compare	+5.4	+5.7▼ 0.3	+8.2#62	+6.9#31	-2.1#98	+0.7#39	-0.1#32	0.26	0.13	45%	45%
57	COLOColorado2-3Big 12 · 2-3	▲4	Compare	+5.3	+5.3no change	+13.1#50	-1.1#96	+8.8#20	-1.5#135	-0.8#76	0.07	-0.04	43%	34%
58	TXSTTexas State2-3Pac-12 · 2-3	▲7	Compare	+5.3	+4.8▲ 0.5	+12.4#51	+9.1#21	-1.8#93	-0.9#128	-1.0#94	0.28	0.13	48%	45%
59	CLEMClemson3-2ACC · 3-2	▲8	Compare	+5.3	+4.5▲ 0.8	+8.2#63	-3.1#105	+7.9#24	+0.7#41	-0.2#39	0.06	-0.04	39%	36%
60	NDSUNorth Dakota State5-1Mountain West · 5-1	▼1	Compare	+5.2	+5.7▼ 0.5	+8.4#60	-1.8#99	+6.7#34	+0.7#42	-0.3#45	0.09	-0.04	40%	40%
61	GASTGeorgia State4-1Sun Belt · 4-1	▲3	Compare	+5.2	+4.9▲ 0.3	+8.4#61	+5.2#44	-0.4#82	+0.6#50	-0.3#41	0.19	0.13	47%	41%
62	LTLouisiana Tech3-2Sun Belt · 3-2	▲10	Compare	+4.9	+3.2▲ 1.7	+8.9#58	+2.2#69	+3.0#57	+0.2#69	-0.4#48	0.15	0.08	43%	37%
63	MEMMemphis5-1American · 5-1	▲12	Compare	+4.7	+2.6▲ 2.1	+8.7#59	+5.6#42	-0.5#84	-0.2#95	-0.2#37	0.20	0.13	47%	41%
64	MINNMinnesota4-2Big Ten · 4-2	▼10	Compare	+4.6	+6.5▼ 1.9	+4.9#76	-1.4#97	+4.3#44	+2.1#5	-0.4#49	0.07	0.03	42%	39%
65	LIBLiberty5-1CUSA · 5-1	▲12	Compare	+4.2	+2.0▲ 2.2	+7.7#66	+2.4#65	+2.1#66	0.0#86	-0.3#42	0.12	0.09	47%	38%
66	WASHWashington3-3Big Ten · 3-3	▼14	Compare	+4.2	+7.3▼ 3.1	+7.9#65	+2.2#70	+2.5#64	+0.5#52	-1.0#90	0.16	0.04	43%	42%
67	DUKEDuke4-1ACC · 4-1	▼10	Compare	+4.1	+6.0▼ 1.9	+7.0#69	+2.3#67	+1.8#70	+0.3#65	-0.3#43	0.18	0.07	41%	41%
68	ECUEast Carolina3-2American · 3-2	▼5	Compare	+3.9	+5.1▼ 1.2	+7.0#68	-0.5#91	+4.6#41	+0.4#61	-0.5#55	0.11	0.03	40%	38%
69	MSUMichigan State2-4Big Ten · 2-4	▼1	Compare	+3.7	+3.9▼ 0.2	+5.9#71	+1.0#85	+2.5#63	+1.4#17	-1.1#100	0.08	0.07	47%	39%
70	ASUArizona State3-2Big 12 · 3-2	▼8	Compare	+3.2	+5.1▼ 1.9	+8.1#64	+1.6#74	+3.1#56	-1.1#130	-0.5#52	0.11	0.05	46%	39%
71	NCSUNC State3-3ACC · 3-3	▼11	Compare	+3.1	+5.5▼ 2.4	+5.6#74	+5.6#43	-2.3#101	+0.8#36	-0.9#85	0.22	0.15	45%	43%
72	MDMaryland2-4Big Ten · 2-4	▲1	Compare	+3.1	+3.0▲ 0.1	+7.2#67	-1.0#94	+5.2#38	-0.1#90	-1.0#93	0.09	0.00	41%	39%
73	ILLIllinois3-3Big Ten · 3-3	▼3	Compare	+3.0	+3.8▼ 0.8	+5.7#72	+8.3#25	-5.0#118	+0.6#44	-0.9#80	0.24	0.22	50%	43%
74	FRESFresno State4-2Pac-12 · 4-2	▲4	Compare	+2.6	+1.9▲ 0.7	+3.5#79	+0.1#89	+2.0#67	+1.1#20	-0.6#56	0.12	0.04	41%	43%
75	ARKArkansas2-4SEC · 2-4	▼6	Compare	+2.6	+3.9▼ 1.3	+5.6#73	+2.9#61	+0.4#79	+0.3#64	-1.0#87	0.14	0.12	46%	40%
76	AFAir Force4-1Mountain West · 4-1	▲12	Compare	+2.1	-1.9▲ 4.0	+5.2#75	+3.1#56	-0.1#81	-0.6#118	-0.3#47	0.14	0.14	47%	39%
77	NAVYNavy2-3American · 2-3	▲9	Compare	+2.0	-0.8▲ 2.8	+6.5#70	+2.6#63	+1.2#75	-0.5#117	-1.3#110	0.14	0.13	46%	37%
78	ARMYArmy3-2American · 3-2	▲6	Compare	+1.4	+0.3▲ 1.1	+2.7#81	+5.1#46	-3.6#108	+0.6#45	-0.8#75	0.18	0.17	48%	45%
79	SYRSyracuse2-3ACC · 2-3	▼5	Compare	+1.1	+2.7▼ 1.6	+4.6#77	+0.8#86	+1.9#68	-0.5#116	-1.1#95	0.10	0.06	44%	42%
80	CONNUConn3-3Independents · 3-3	▲3	Compare	+1.0	+0.4▲ 0.6	+2.2#83	+2.5#64	-1.2#88	+1.0#26	-1.3#111	0.17	0.11	42%	45%
81	GTGeorgia Tech2-3ACC · 2-3	▼1	Compare	+0.8	+1.5▼ 0.7	+3.3#80	+5.6#41	-3.7#111	0.0#87	-1.2#102	0.21	0.18	46%	44%
82	USFSouth Florida4-2American · 4-2	▼3	Compare	+0.7	+1.9▼ 1.2	+0.6#85	+2.1#72	-1.7#92	+1.1#24	-0.8#72	0.13	0.11	45%	45%
83	JXSTJacksonville State4-2CUSA · 4-2	▲4	Compare	+0.2	-0.8▲ 1.0	+0.2#87	+1.3#80	-1.1#87	+0.8#33	-0.8#73	0.11	0.12	45%	43%
84	TLSATulsa3-3American · 3-3	▼8	Compare	+0.1	+2.2▼ 2.1	+1.9#84	-2.8#103	+3.9#49	+0.1#78	-1.1#96	0.08	0.04	38%	38%
85	TOLToledo4-2MAC · 4-2	▼14	Compare	0.0	+3.4▼ 3.4	+2.6#82	-0.3#90	+1.8#69	-0.7#121	-0.8#77	0.12	0.09	40%	39%
86	FAUFlorida Atlantic4-1American · 4-1	▼1	Compare	-0.2	-0.1▼ 0.1	-1.5#89	+3.0#58	-4.0#113	+0.9#30	-0.2#34	0.15	0.22	45%	41%
87	ULLouisiana4-2Sun Belt · 4-2	▼5	Compare	-0.5	+1.1▼ 1.6	+0.5#86	-2.2#101	+2.5#62	-0.2#102	-0.6#59	0.07	0.04	40%	42%
88	GASOGeorgia Southern2-4Sun Belt · 2-4	▲1	Compare	-0.6	-2.1▲ 1.5	+4.5#78	+3.0#59	-0.4#83	-1.8#138	-1.5#117	0.16	0.14	45%	40%
89	WMUWestern Michigan4-2MAC · 4-2	▲4	Compare	-1.3	-3.0▲ 1.7	-2.4#92	+0.7#87	-2.1#97	+0.7#38	-0.6#58	0.11	0.13	44%	45%
90	CALCalifornia3-3ACC · 3-3	▲2	Compare	-1.4	-3.0▲ 1.6	+0.1#88	-1.7#98	+1.8#71	-0.4#109	-1.0#91	0.07	0.10	41%	38%
91	WVUWest Virginia3-3Big 12 · 3-3	▼10	Compare	-1.9	+1.2▼ 3.1	-1.7#90	+3.3#55	-4.3#116	+0.1#80	-1.0#89	0.17	0.18	44%	46%
92	UNLVUNLV4-2Mountain West · 4-2	▲9	Compare	-2.4	-4.6▲ 2.2	-2.0#91	-4.4#110	+3.2#54	-0.5#114	-0.7#67	0.06	0.05	36%	39%
93	OHIOOhio4-2MAC · 4-2	▲12	Compare	-2.8	-5.3▲ 2.5	-4.1#95	+1.2#81	-3.6#110	+0.3#63	-0.7#65	0.12	0.18	44%	44%
94	TROYTroy3-2Sun Belt · 3-2	▲4	Compare	-2.9	-4.0▲ 1.1	-3.1#93	+0.2#88	-2.0#94	-0.5#115	-0.6#61	0.10	0.15	43%	43%
95	RUTGRutgers1-4Big Ten · 1-4	–	Compare	-4.3	-3.6▼ 0.7	-6.0#99	+3.1#57	-6.6#128	+0.7#40	-1.5#119	0.14	0.21	46%	48%
96	MASSMassachusetts4-2MAC · 4-2	▲3	Compare	-4.4	-4.3▼ 0.1	-9.1#107	-3.6#106	-1.7#91	+1.9#6	-0.9#82	0.04	0.13	39%	44%
97	CSUColorado State2-3Pac-12 · 2-3	▲7	Compare	-4.4	-5.3▲ 0.9	-5.4#96	+4.9#48	-8.0#133	-0.2#101	-1.0#92	0.21	0.22	44%	51%
98	M-OHMiami (OH)3-3MAC · 3-3	▲4	Compare	-4.5	-4.7▲ 0.2	-5.4#97	-0.6#92	-2.6#105	-0.2#100	-1.1#97	0.13	0.15	39%	44%
99	TEMTemple2-4American · 2-4	▼8	Compare	-5.0	-2.7▼ 2.3	-5.7#98	+2.0#73	-5.3#121	0.0#83	-1.7#126	0.17	0.20	41%	46%
100	BCBoston College2-3ACC · 2-3	▼3	Compare	-5.0	-3.9▼ 1.1	-4.0#94	-6.1#123	+3.8#50	-1.6#136	-1.1#98	-0.00	0.05	37%	38%
101	ODUOld Dominion2-4Sun Belt · 2-4	▲8	Compare	-5.6	-5.9▲ 0.3	-6.6#100	-11.3#137	+7.4#29	-0.2#96	-1.6#121	-0.07	-0.03	31%	37%
102	USUUtah State2-4Pac-12 · 2-4	▼2	Compare	-5.9	-4.5▼ 1.4	-7.5#101	-7.1#125	+2.7#60	-0.2#98	-1.3#114	-0.01	0.06	36%	40%
103	TULNTulane2-3American · 2-3	▼13	Compare	-6.0	-2.7▼ 3.3	-8.0#103	-5.4#113	+0.8#77	-0.2#97	-1.2#101	0.06	0.11	34%	40%
104	FIUFlorida International3-2CUSA · 3-2	▲10	Compare	-6.0	-7.5▲ 1.5	-9.4#108	-8.8#133	+3.3#53	+0.3#62	-0.8#78	-0.07	0.06	37%	39%
105	KENNKennesaw State1-4CUSA · 1-4	▲2	Compare	-6.0	-5.4▼ 0.6	-7.6#102	-2.0#100	-2.4#103	0.0#84	-1.6#124	0.07	0.16	41%	43%
106	APPApp State3-2Sun Belt · 3-2	▼12	Compare	-6.4	-3.3▼ 3.1	-10.7#110	-4.0#108	-2.3#102	+0.6#46	-0.8#74	0.04	0.13	38%	45%
107	ARSTArkansas State2-4Sun Belt · 2-4	▲4	Compare	-6.7	-6.7no change	-8.3#104	+1.5#76	-6.3#127	-0.2#104	-1.6#123	0.10	0.21	47%	47%
108	SHSUSam Houston1-4CUSA · 1-4	▼12	Compare	-7.0	-3.6▼ 3.4	-8.8#106	-2.6#102	-2.5#104	-0.3#107	-1.5#120	0.02	0.16	44%	43%
109	STANStanford2-4ACC · 2-4	▼1	Compare	-7.3	-5.6▼ 1.7	-11.0#112	-0.9#93	-5.5#123	+0.1#79	-1.0#88	0.12	0.22	38%	45%
110	RICERice1-5American · 1-5	▲7	Compare	-7.4	-8.5▲ 1.1	-8.3#105	-5.4#114	+0.6#78	-0.8#124	-1.8#131	0.00	0.11	39%	40%
111	NEVNevada2-3Mountain West · 2-3	▲9	Compare	-7.4	-10.2▲ 2.8	-13.0#114	-5.6#117	-2.0#95	+1.5#13	-1.4#116	-0.00	0.18	38%	40%
112	UABUAB3-3American · 3-3	▼9	Compare	-7.5	-5.2▼ 2.3	-13.6#118	-5.9#121	-2.0#96	+1.6#11	-1.2#106	-0.03	0.13	41%	45%
113	WSUWashington State1-5Pac-12 · 1-5	▲2	Compare	-7.6	-7.6no change	-9.5#109	-8.2#130	+2.7#61	0.0#88	-2.0#133	-0.03	0.05	34%	41%
114	DELDelaware2-3CUSA · 2-3	▼1	Compare	-7.7	-6.9▼ 0.8	-11.1#113	-2.9#104	-3.6#109	0.0#85	-1.2#103	0.05	0.17	40%	44%
115	CCUCoastal Carolina2-4Sun Belt · 2-4	▼3	Compare	-8.0	-6.9▼ 1.1	-13.0#115	-5.0#111	-2.6#106	+1.4#16	-1.8#130	0.04	0.14	37%	45%
116	SDSUSan Diego State2-4Pac-12 · 2-4	▼6	Compare	-8.0	-5.9▼ 2.1	-13.4#117	-8.1#129	+0.3#80	+1.2#19	-1.3#113	-0.02	0.07	34%	45%
117	USASouth Alabama4-2Sun Belt · 4-2	▲1	Compare	-9.0	-8.6▼ 0.4	-14.0#119	+1.0#84	-9.2#136	-0.1#92	-0.7#63	0.16	0.27	40%	49%
118	USMSouthern Miss1-4Sun Belt · 1-4	▼12	Compare	-9.0	-5.4▼ 3.6	-10.9#111	-1.1#95	-5.3#120	-0.9#126	-1.7#125	0.07	0.20	43%	46%
119	SJSUSan José State3-3Mountain West · 3-3	▼3	Compare	-9.4	-8.4▼ 1.0	-13.3#116	-6.7#124	-1.1#86	-0.4#111	-1.2#104	0.01	0.11	35%	44%
120	WKUWestern Kentucky2-4CUSA · 2-4	▲7	Compare	-10.0	-12.9▲ 2.9	-15.8#120	-5.1#112	-4.2#114	+0.4#56	-1.3#109	0.01	0.20	39%	44%
121	EMUEastern Michigan4-3MAC · 4-3	▼2	Compare	-10.1	-9.3▼ 0.8	-16.3#121	-4.3#109	-5.2#119	+0.6#48	-1.1#99	0.03	0.21	39%	45%
122	MTSUMiddle Tennessee2-3CUSA · 2-3	▲3	Compare	-11.6	-12.0▲ 0.4	-18.0#124	-5.7#120	-4.8#117	+0.2#70	-1.2#107	0.01	0.18	38%	47%
123	MRSHMarshall3-3Sun Belt · 3-3	▼1	Compare	-11.6	-10.4▼ 1.2	-17.1#123	+1.1#82	-11.1#138	-0.4#112	-1.2#105	0.13	0.33	43%	48%
124	WYOWyoming3-3Mountain West · 3-3	▲2	Compare	-11.7	-12.4▲ 0.7	-19.2#125	-5.6#118	-5.6#124	+0.8#37	-1.3#112	-0.01	0.18	39%	49%
125	NMSUNew Mexico State2-4CUSA · 2-4	▼1	Compare	-12.7	-11.6▼ 1.1	-17.0#122	-8.3#131	-1.7#90	-1.0#129	-1.7#127	-0.06	0.14	38%	43%
126	BUFBuffalo3-3MAC · 3-3	▲9	Compare	-13.3	-15.7▲ 2.4	-20.9#129	-8.0#128	-4.2#115	+0.1#75	-1.2#108	-0.02	0.21	34%	42%
127	CMUCentral Michigan3-3MAC · 3-3	▼4	Compare	-13.5	-10.8▼ 2.7	-21.3#130	-5.7#119	-6.8#130	-0.1#89	-1.0#86	0.02	0.22	36%	48%
128	BGSUBowling Green2-4MAC · 2-4	▲5	Compare	-14.2	-15.2▲ 1.0	-19.6#126	-9.3#135	-2.2#99	-1.2#131	-1.5#118	-0.09	0.13	37%	45%
129	MOSTMissouri State1-4CUSA · 1-4	▼8	Compare	-14.4	-10.3▼ 4.1	-20.7#127	-5.5#115	-6.6#129	-0.7#123	-1.6#122	0.01	0.22	38%	48%
130	HAWHawai'i1-5Mountain West · 1-5	▲2	Compare	-15.0	-14.8▼ 0.2	-23.3#134	-5.5#116	-8.1#134	+1.0#28	-2.3#137	0.01	0.25	38%	49%
131	BALLBall State1-5MAC · 1-5	–	Compare	-15.0	-14.3▼ 0.7	-22.2#131	-5.9#122	-7.0#131	-0.3#106	-1.8#129	0.02	0.27	35%	44%
132	KENTKent State2-4MAC · 2-4	▼2	Compare	-15.2	-14.2▼ 1.0	-22.3#132	-9.2#134	-3.8#112	-0.8#125	-1.4#115	-0.04	0.17	33%	45%
133	SACSacramento State1-5MAC · 1-5	▼5	Compare	-15.3	-13.3▼ 2.0	-23.6#135	-8.4#132	-5.4#122	+0.8#35	-2.3#136	-0.07	0.24	38%	43%
134	AKRAkron1-5MAC · 1-5	–	Compare	-15.7	-15.5▼ 0.2	-20.8#128	-3.7#107	-8.4#135	-1.4#133	-2.1#134	0.03	0.27	40%	48%
135	NIUNorthern Illinois0-5Mountain West · 0-5	▼6	Compare	-16.0	-14.0▼ 2.0	-22.7#133	-7.4#127	-5.9#125	-0.9#127	-1.9#132	-0.08	0.22	41%	46%
136	ULMUL Monroe0-5Sun Belt · 0-5	▲1	Compare	-20.4	-19.4▼ 1.0	-28.7#136	-7.3#126	-9.5#137	-1.4#134	-2.2#135	-0.05	0.28	39%	49%
137	CLTCharlotte0-6American · 0-6	▼1	Compare	-20.6	-18.0▼ 2.6	-31.2#137	-11.9#138	-6.3#126	+0.1#74	-2.5#138	-0.11	0.21	33%	48%
138	UTEPUTEP1-5Mountain West · 1-5	–	Compare	-22.1	-20.1▼ 2.0	-32.6#138	-11.2#136	-7.9#132	-1.3#132	-1.8#128	-0.12	0.23	36%	49%

Tap a column name to sort. Small numbers next to each value are that team's national rank.

How to read the rating

+30.6 means about 30 points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field. Compare two teams' ratings to see who the computer thinks is better, and by about how much. Last Wk shows last week's rating, so you can tell whether a team actually improved or just passed a team that dropped.

Offense + defense + special teams + record

Each part is in points per game versus average, so they add up to the Power rating. A big defense number means opponents score far less than usual against them. Record (how impressive the record is for its schedule) gets only a small say, because in testing more weight made the rating worse at telling who's better.

Why it can differ from the résumé

A team can play great and still lose close games, or win ugly against a soft schedule. The Power Rankings judge how good a team is; the Résumé Rankings judge what it has earned.