College Football · 2026 · Week 5

StatboyPower Rankings.

What it's based on

Who is the best team right now?

How well each team plays on every snap, not its record. The computer measures offense and defense play by play (points added per play and success rate), adjusts every number for the quality of the opponent and its conference, and adds special teams (field goals and punting) plus a small credit for Record Strength. Blowout garbage time is thrown out. Last season's numbers count a little early in the year and are gone by Week 8.

Points added per play
Success rate
Opponent adjusted
Special teams
Record Strength
No garbage time

100% computer. No human votes or hand adjustments. Results through games of October 3. Updated every morning.

Share this graphicPreview ↗Graphic shows:Top 10 · Week 5 · Instagram-ready image

	Team	Move	Compare		Last Wk
1	ALAAlabama5-0SEC · 5-0	▲1	Compare	+31.1	+25.9▲ 5.2	+51.6#1	+14.8#4	+15.0#3	+0.5#54	+0.8#1	0.38	-0.16	53%	30%
2	UGAGeorgia5-0SEC · 5-0	▲1	Compare	+27.6	+25.4▲ 2.2	+46.0#3	+16.2#2	+10.4#8	+0.6#49	+0.4#5	0.37	-0.07	57%	33%
3	NDNotre Dame5-0Independents · 5-0	▼2	Compare	+27.6	+27.1▲ 0.5	+46.8#2	+14.5#5	+12.6#5	+0.1#82	+0.5#3	0.35	-0.11	55%	31%
4	OSUOhio State4-1Big Ten · 4-1	▲3	Compare	+24.0	+21.5▲ 2.5	+41.8#4	+15.0#3	+9.2#15	-0.2#104	+0.1#23	0.36	-0.08	55%	36%
5	MIAMiami5-0ACC · 5-0	▲3	Compare	+24.0	+21.0▲ 3.0	+40.6#6	+16.7#1	+6.8#31	+0.1#77	+0.4#7	0.41	-0.04	55%	39%
6	IUIndiana5-0Big Ten · 5-0	▲6	Compare	+22.2	+18.9▲ 3.3	+38.6#7	+12.1#11	+10.3#9	-0.5#114	+0.3#10	0.36	-0.06	48%	33%
7	LSULSU4-1SEC · 4-1	▼2	Compare	+22.0	+23.4▼ 1.4	+40.8#5	+7.8#26	+15.8#1	-1.5#135	0.0#29	0.23	-0.15	50%	27%
8	BYUBYU4-0Big 12 · 4-0	▼2	Compare	+21.7	+22.8▼ 1.1	+35.1#9	+10.5#14	+9.8#12	+1.1#24	+0.4#9	0.31	-0.08	49%	35%
9	MIZMissouri4-1SEC · 4-1	▲6	Compare	+21.5	+18.0▲ 3.5	+34.8#10	+7.8#25	+12.3#6	+1.1#22	+0.2#13	0.26	-0.10	47%	31%
10	TEXTexas4-0SEC · 4-0	▲1	Compare	+21.2	+20.3▲ 0.9	+34.1#11	+5.6#40	+14.1#4	+0.9#32	+0.7#2	0.20	-0.14	47%	30%
11	UTAHUtah4-0Big 12 · 4-0	▼1	Compare	+21.2	+20.4▲ 0.8	+36.0#8	+11.9#13	+8.9#19	+0.2#70	+0.2#14	0.34	-0.05	50%	34%
12	FLAFlorida4-1SEC · 4-1	▼8	Compare	+20.4	+23.4▼ 3.0	+30.4#14	+12.4#10	+5.2#41	+2.7#2	+0.2#15	0.33	-0.01	51%	39%
13	TTUTexas Tech5-0Big 12 · 5-0	–	Compare	+19.2	+18.7▲ 0.5	+29.5#15	+6.0#39	+11.0#7	+1.6#12	+0.5#4	0.20	-0.10	48%	34%
14	OREOregon3-1Big Ten · 3-1	–	Compare	+18.8	+18.2▲ 0.6	+30.8#13	+9.3#17	+8.5#21	+1.0#28	0.0#27	0.31	-0.04	46%	35%
15	MSSTMississippi State4-1SEC · 4-1	▼6	Compare	+18.2	+20.5▼ 2.3	+31.0#12	+12.0#12	+6.0#36	-0.1#94	+0.4#6	0.31	0.00	53%	37%
16	TENNTennessee4-1SEC · 4-1	–	Compare	+17.8	+16.7▲ 1.1	+29.0#17	+6.6#35	+10.1#10	+1.0#25	0.0#28	0.24	-0.10	45%	36%
17	HOUHouston4-1Big 12 · 4-1	▲1	Compare	+17.5	+16.6▲ 0.9	+29.1#16	+12.6#8	+4.2#48	+0.7#45	+0.1#25	0.29	0.04	56%	38%
18	OUOklahoma2-2SEC · 2-2	▼1	Compare	+17.0	+16.6▲ 0.4	+27.6#20	+0.6#80	+15.3#2	+1.4#17	-0.3#52	0.10	-0.16	44%	29%
19	NEBNebraska5-0Big Ten · 5-0	▲11	Compare	+16.5	+13.0▲ 3.5	+28.5#18	+9.5#16	+6.9#29	-0.2#99	+0.2#16	0.29	-0.00	48%	35%
20	UCLAUCLA4-0Big Ten · 4-0	▼1	Compare	+16.2	+15.9▲ 0.3	+27.4#21	+8.7#19	+7.1#26	+0.1#76	+0.3#11	0.25	-0.02	50%	36%
21	UKKentucky4-1SEC · 4-1	▲5	Compare	+15.8	+14.3▲ 1.5	+26.8#22	+8.6#20	+6.9#30	+0.1#79	+0.2#12	0.22	-0.05	52%	39%
22	KUKansas2-2Big 12 · 2-2	▲16	Compare	+15.4	+11.4▲ 4.0	+27.7#19	+6.2#38	+9.8#11	+0.1#80	-0.7#79	0.23	-0.03	46%	31%
23	NUNorthwestern3-1Big Ten · 3-1	▲21	Compare	+15.0	+10.4▲ 4.6	+25.4#23	+12.7#7	+2.0#66	+0.3#65	0.0#26	0.31	0.04	54%	43%
24	USCUSC5-1Big Ten · 5-1	▼1	Compare	+14.9	+14.6▲ 0.3	+24.2#25	+12.5#9	+1.5#73	+0.9#29	-0.1#32	0.33	0.09	52%	40%
25	MISSOle Miss3-1SEC · 3-1	▼5	Compare	+14.6	+15.6▼ 1.0	+24.3#24	+13.6#6	+0.4#78	+0.3#63	+0.2#17	0.34	0.09	54%	43%
26	WAKEWake Forest4-1ACC · 4-1	▲9	Compare	+14.4	+11.9▲ 2.5	+22.6#29	+7.7#27	+5.4#40	+1.2#20	+0.1#21	0.25	0.00	47%	38%
27	PITTPittsburgh5-0ACC · 5-0	▼2	Compare	+14.1	+14.3▼ 0.2	+20.5#34	+3.9#53	+8.0#23	+1.9#6	+0.4#8	0.21	-0.02	42%	34%
28	BAYBaylor4-1Big 12 · 4-1	▲11	Compare	+13.9	+11.4▲ 2.5	+21.2#33	+5.1#45	+7.2#25	+1.7#8	-0.1#33	0.21	-0.02	44%	36%
29	AUBAuburn3-2SEC · 3-2	▼7	Compare	+13.8	+15.3▼ 1.5	+23.8#27	+4.4#50	+9.4#14	+0.2#68	-0.2#43	0.18	-0.08	45%	36%
30	IOWAIowa4-1Big Ten · 4-1	▼9	Compare	+13.6	+15.6▼ 2.0	+21.4#31	+3.7#56	+8.7#20	+1.1#21	+0.1#24	0.18	-0.04	44%	34%
31	ARIZArizona4-1Big 12 · 4-1	▲3	Compare	+13.3	+12.1▲ 1.2	+24.0#26	+7.4#28	+6.5#33	-0.5#115	-0.1#34	0.23	-0.01	48%	36%
32	BOISBoise State4-1Pac-12 · 4-1	▲5	Compare	+13.2	+11.5▲ 1.7	+23.0#28	+7.4#29	+5.9#37	0.0#89	-0.1#35	0.24	0.01	47%	36%
33	TA&MTexas A&M3-2SEC · 3-2	–	Compare	+12.9	+12.1▲ 0.8	+20.1#35	+5.0#48	+6.7#32	+1.7#11	-0.4#57	0.20	-0.01	45%	36%
34	MICHMichigan3-2Big Ten · 3-2	▼10	Compare	+12.8	+14.5▼ 1.7	+22.1#30	+3.9#54	+8.9#17	+0.6#50	-0.5#67	0.18	-0.04	45%	34%
35	KSUKansas State3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▼6	Compare	+12.1	+13.1▼ 1.0	+18.6#38	+6.3#37	+4.5#44	+1.6#13	-0.3#53	0.22	0.03	46%	38%
36	WISWisconsin4-1Big Ten · 4-1	▲9	Compare	+11.8	+9.0▲ 2.8	+19.6#36	+2.4#63	+8.9#18	+0.4#60	+0.1#22	0.17	-0.05	42%	34%
37	UCFUCF3-2Big 12 · 3-2	▲4	Compare	+11.6	+10.8▲ 0.8	+17.0#43	+0.4#82	+9.4#13	+2.1#3	-0.4#54	0.11	-0.07	43%	35%
38	LOULouisville2-3ACC · 2-3	▼6	Compare	+11.2	+12.4▼ 1.2	+21.4#32	+8.0#24	+4.4#46	-0.2#97	-0.9#96	0.27	0.04	47%	37%
39	SMUSMU4-1ACC · 4-1	▼8	Compare	+10.6	+13.0▼ 2.4	+19.3#37	+6.8#31	+4.3#47	-0.4#112	-0.1#38	0.21	0.03	49%	38%
40	JMUJames Madison5-0Sun Belt · 5-0	▼12	Compare	+10.3	+13.1▼ 2.8	+12.2#53	+4.2#51	+2.9#63	+3.1#1	+0.1#19	0.19	0.05	44%	40%
41	TCUTCU2-3Big 12 · 2-3	▲5	Compare	+10.3	+8.8▲ 1.5	+17.5#40	+1.2#75	+8.9#16	+1.1#23	-0.9#97	0.14	-0.06	42%	35%
42	VTVirginia Tech4-1ACC · 4-1	▼2	Compare	+10.2	+11.3▼ 1.1	+15.0#46	+8.3#22	+0.4#79	+1.7#10	-0.2#40	0.25	0.12	49%	40%
43	VANVanderbilt3-2SEC · 3-2	▼16	Compare	+10.2	+13.5▼ 3.3	+17.4#41	+3.6#57	+6.4#34	+0.5#55	-0.3#50	0.20	-0.01	42%	37%
44	SCSouth Carolina2-3SEC · 2-3	▼2	Compare	+10.2	+10.7▼ 0.5	+15.5#45	+5.5#41	+3.4#55	+2.0#4	-0.7#87	0.20	0.07	46%	37%
45	PSUPenn State3-2Big Ten · 3-2	▼2	Compare	+9.7	+10.6▼ 0.9	+18.4#39	+3.6#58	+7.1#28	-0.4#108	-0.6#70	0.21	-0.02	41%	36%
46	OKSTOklahoma State3-1Big 12 · 3-1	▲1	Compare	+9.5	+8.5▲ 1.0	+16.1#44	+3.3#60	+6.0#35	+0.3#64	-0.1#37	0.13	-0.00	48%	37%
47	ORSTOregon State3-2Pac-12 · 3-2	▲9	Compare	+8.8	+6.3▲ 2.5	+17.2#42	+6.7#32	+3.2#59	-0.7#123	-0.5#64	0.23	0.07	47%	38%
48	UNMNew Mexico4-1Mountain West · 4-1	▲20	Compare	+8.3	+4.4▲ 3.9	+14.4#48	+1.1#77	+7.3#24	+0.2#73	-0.2#42	0.13	-0.02	42%	35%
49	FSUFlorida State3-2ACC · 3-2	▲18	Compare	+8.0	+5.0▲ 3.0	+13.3#50	+8.5#21	-0.8#86	+0.7#44	-0.4#58	0.29	0.14	46%	41%
50	UNCNorth Carolina2-2ACC · 2-2	▲2	Compare	+7.8	+7.0▲ 0.8	+14.6#47	+6.5#36	+1.9#67	-0.2#100	-0.4#61	0.19	0.06	50%	42%
51	UVAVirginia3-2ACC · 3-2	▼15	Compare	+7.7	+11.7▼ 4.0	+13.8#49	+4.0#52	+4.0#51	+0.4#58	-0.7#85	0.18	0.03	45%	39%
52	WASHWashington3-2Big Ten · 3-2	▼3	Compare	+7.3	+7.9▼ 0.6	+13.1#52	+2.0#68	+5.5#39	+0.4#59	-0.7#77	0.15	-0.01	43%	39%
53	ISUIowa State3-2Big 12 · 3-2	▼3	Compare	+6.7	+7.7▼ 1.0	+11.7#55	+3.8#55	+2.9#62	+0.4#56	-0.5#66	0.20	0.04	43%	41%
54	MINNMinnesota4-1Big Ten · 4-1	▲5	Compare	+6.5	+6.1▲ 0.4	+7.9#66	+0.1#88	+4.5#45	+1.9#5	0.0#30	0.08	0.03	44%	38%
55	PURPurdue2-3Big Ten · 2-3	▲17	Compare	+6.3	+3.5▲ 2.8	+9.7#58	+8.1#23	-2.5#100	+1.4#16	-0.7#84	0.25	0.16	48%	43%
56	UNTNorth Texas3-2American · 3-2	▲5	Compare	+6.0	+5.3▲ 0.7	+11.5#56	+10.3#15	-3.7#112	-0.2#96	-0.5#63	0.31	0.15	48%	47%
57	DUKEDuke4-0ACC · 4-0	▼6	Compare	+6.0	+7.4▼ 1.4	+9.0#60	+2.1#66	+3.1#61	+0.6#48	+0.2#18	0.18	0.04	40%	41%
58	CINCincinnati4-1Big 12 · 4-1	▼10	Compare	+5.7	+8.3▼ 2.6	+8.9#61	+6.7#34	-1.5#92	+0.7#43	-0.1#36	0.26	0.12	44%	45%
59	NDSUNorth Dakota State5-0Mountain West · 5-0	▲14	Compare	+5.7	+3.1▲ 2.6	+8.0#64	-1.2#98	+5.8#38	+1.0#27	+0.1#20	0.10	-0.03	39%	40%
60	NCSUNC State3-2ACC · 3-2	▼6	Compare	+5.5	+6.8▼ 1.3	+9.0#59	+6.7#33	-1.4#91	+0.8#38	-0.5#69	0.24	0.13	46%	43%
61	COLOColorado2-3Big 12 · 2-3	▲9	Compare	+5.3	+4.0▲ 1.3	+13.2#51	-0.6#93	+8.3#22	-1.5#134	-0.8#90	0.08	-0.03	43%	34%
62	ASUArizona State2-2Big 12 · 2-2	▼9	Compare	+5.1	+6.9▼ 1.8	+10.7#57	+2.0#67	+4.1#49	-0.6#118	-0.5#62	0.11	0.04	46%	38%
63	ECUEast Carolina2-2American · 2-2	▲1	Compare	+5.1	+5.1no change	+8.3#63	+1.5#74	+3.3#56	+0.8#35	-0.5#68	0.14	0.05	43%	39%
64	GASTGeorgia State4-1Sun Belt · 4-1	▲11	Compare	+4.9	+2.6▲ 2.3	+7.9#65	+5.1#44	-0.5#83	+0.6#51	-0.2#46	0.18	0.13	47%	41%
65	TXSTTexas State2-3Pac-12 · 2-3	▼2	Compare	+4.8	+5.2▼ 0.4	+11.7#54	+9.1#18	-2.3#98	-0.9#127	-1.0#101	0.28	0.13	48%	45%
66	UTSAUTSA4-1American · 4-1	▼1	Compare	+4.5	+5.1▼ 0.6	+8.3#62	+1.5#72	+3.3#57	-0.3#105	0.0#31	0.15	0.04	42%	40%
67	CLEMClemson3-2ACC · 3-2	▼9	Compare	+4.5	+6.2▼ 1.7	+7.0#69	-3.0#109	+7.1#27	+0.7#41	-0.2#47	0.06	-0.03	39%	37%
68	MSUMichigan State2-3Big Ten · 2-3	▼6	Compare	+3.9	+5.3▼ 1.4	+5.9#72	+0.2#85	+3.2#58	+1.2#19	-0.7#86	0.06	0.08	47%	37%
69	ARKArkansas2-3SEC · 2-3	▼3	Compare	+3.9	+5.1▼ 1.2	+6.9#70	+3.4#59	+0.6#77	+0.5#53	-0.6#75	0.14	0.12	46%	39%
70	ILLIllinois2-3Big Ten · 2-3	▼15	Compare	+3.8	+6.5▼ 2.7	+7.1#67	+7.3#30	-3.2#107	+0.6#47	-1.0#100	0.24	0.17	48%	43%
71	TOLToledo4-1MAC · 4-1	▼2	Compare	+3.4	+4.1▼ 0.7	+7.1#68	+1.5#73	+2.6#64	-0.4#110	-0.3#51	0.15	0.07	42%	39%
72	LTLouisiana Tech2-2Sun Belt · 2-2	▼1	Compare	+3.2	+3.6▼ 0.4	+5.7#73	+0.1#89	+3.2#60	+0.3#61	-0.4#60	0.12	0.07	41%	37%
73	MDMaryland2-3Big Ten · 2-3	▼16	Compare	+3.0	+6.2▼ 3.2	+6.7#71	-0.2#90	+4.0#50	0.0#84	-0.9#95	0.10	0.03	42%	39%
74	SYRSyracuse2-2ACC · 2-2	▲3	Compare	+2.7	+1.8▲ 0.9	+5.0#75	+0.4#83	+2.5#65	+0.4#57	-0.7#80	0.09	0.04	44%	42%
75	MEMMemphis4-1American · 4-1	▲1	Compare	+2.6	+1.9▲ 0.7	+5.0#74	+5.4#43	-2.6#102	-0.1#90	-0.2#45	0.20	0.17	46%	42%
76	TLSATulsa3-2American · 3-2	▲4	Compare	+2.2	+1.1▲ 1.1	+4.6#77	-2.5#102	+5.1#42	+0.2#69	-0.7#78	0.08	0.03	39%	37%
77	LIBLiberty4-1CUSA · 4-1	▲4	Compare	+2.0	+0.2▲ 1.8	+3.6#78	+0.7#79	+1.4#74	+0.1#75	-0.2#48	0.09	0.10	45%	39%
78	FRESFresno State4-1Pac-12 · 4-1	▲23	Compare	+1.9	-3.4▲ 5.3	+1.8#83	-2.4#101	+3.5#54	+1.0#26	-0.2#41	0.08	0.00	39%	43%
79	USFSouth Florida4-1American · 4-1	▼5	Compare	+1.9	+3.0▼ 1.1	+2.2#81	+1.6#71	-0.3#82	+0.9#30	-0.4#55	0.12	0.09	45%	44%
80	GTGeorgia Tech1-3ACC · 1-3	▼2	Compare	+1.5	+1.6▼ 0.1	+4.9#76	+5.0#47	-2.2#95	-0.1#92	-1.2#116	0.20	0.15	45%	44%
81	WVUWest Virginia3-2Big 12 · 3-2	▼2	Compare	+1.2	+1.3▼ 0.1	+3.1#79	+5.0#46	-3.2#109	+0.1#78	-0.6#74	0.21	0.15	45%	45%
82	ULLouisiana4-1Sun Belt · 4-1	▲2	Compare	+1.1	-0.2▲ 1.3	+2.7#80	-2.2#100	+3.8#52	-0.2#103	-0.2#44	0.07	0.03	39%	40%
83	CONNUConn2-3Independents · 2-3	▼23	Compare	+0.4	+5.5▼ 5.1	+1.4#84	+2.0#69	-1.2#90	+0.9#33	-1.3#121	0.17	0.12	41%	44%
84	ARMYArmy2-2American · 2-2	▼1	Compare	+0.3	-0.2▲ 0.5	+0.6#86	+5.5#42	-5.2#125	+0.8#40	-0.8#91	0.19	0.20	48%	46%
85	FAUFlorida Atlantic4-1American · 4-1	–	Compare	-0.1	-0.3▲ 0.2	-1.4#87	+3.1#62	-3.9#113	+0.9#31	-0.1#39	0.16	0.22	45%	41%
86	NAVYNavy1-3American · 1-3	▲4	Compare	-0.8	-1.4▲ 0.6	+2.0#82	+0.1#87	+1.0#76	-0.6#119	-1.3#123	0.10	0.12	43%	38%
87	JXSTJacksonville State3-2CUSA · 3-2	–	Compare	-0.8	-1.0▲ 0.2	-1.6#88	+1.2#76	-2.1#93	+0.9#34	-0.8#92	0.10	0.13	45%	45%
88	AFAir Force3-1Mountain West · 3-1	–	Compare	-1.9	-1.3▼ 0.6	-1.9#89	-0.4#92	-0.7#84	-0.5#116	-0.4#56	0.10	0.15	41%	39%
89	GASOGeorgia Southern2-3Sun Belt · 2-3	▲5	Compare	-2.1	-2.1no change	+1.4#85	+1.9#70	-1.1#89	-1.8#137	-1.1#104	0.14	0.16	43%	39%
90	TULNTulane2-2American · 2-2	▲3	Compare	-2.7	-1.9▼ 0.8	-3.1#93	-2.2#99	+0.4#81	-0.2#101	-0.7#76	0.12	0.11	36%	40%
91	TEMTemple2-3American · 2-3	▲12	Compare	-2.7	-3.7▲ 1.0	-2.8#92	+2.3#65	-3.9#114	+0.1#81	-1.2#114	0.18	0.18	41%	45%
92	CALCalifornia2-3ACC · 2-3	▼1	Compare	-3.0	-1.7▼ 1.3	-2.2#90	-2.7#105	+1.4#75	-0.6#120	-1.1#110	0.06	0.11	40%	38%
93	WMUWestern Michigan3-2MAC · 3-2	▲9	Compare	-3.0	-3.4▲ 0.4	-5.6#99	-0.9#96	-2.3#99	+0.8#37	-0.6#71	0.07	0.13	43%	46%
94	APPApp State3-1Sun Belt · 3-1	▲2	Compare	-3.3	-2.6▼ 0.7	-5.3#97	-0.8#95	-2.3#96	0.0#87	-0.3#49	0.11	0.14	39%	44%
95	RUTGRutgers1-4Big Ten · 1-4	▼6	Compare	-3.6	-1.3▼ 2.3	-4.8#96	+3.2#61	-6.0#130	+0.7#42	-1.5#131	0.14	0.21	46%	47%
96	SHSUSam Houston1-3CUSA · 1-3	▲8	Compare	-3.6	-3.9▲ 0.3	-3.2#94	-0.7#94	-1.1#88	-0.6#121	-1.1#108	0.05	0.14	46%	42%
97	BCBoston College2-3ACC · 2-3	▲10	Compare	-3.9	-5.1▲ 1.2	-2.3#91	-5.0#117	+3.7#53	-1.6#136	-1.1#103	0.02	0.05	38%	38%
98	TROYTroy2-2Sun Belt · 2-2	▲8	Compare	-4.0	-4.4▲ 0.4	-4.5#95	-3.0#107	+0.4#80	-0.8#124	-0.6#72	0.05	0.11	40%	40%
99	MASSMassachusetts4-1MAC · 4-1	▼13	Compare	-4.3	-0.7▼ 3.6	-9.8#109	-2.7#106	-2.9#104	+1.7#9	-0.4#59	0.04	0.15	41%	45%
100	USUUtah State1-4Pac-12 · 1-4	–	Compare	-4.5	-3.3▼ 1.2	-5.3#98	-4.6#115	+1.6#72	-0.1#91	-1.3#124	0.03	0.07	38%	41%
101	UNLVUNLV3-2Mountain West · 3-2	▲7	Compare	-4.6	-5.1▲ 0.5	-5.7#100	-5.1#118	+1.8#69	-0.5#117	-0.8#88	0.05	0.08	35%	40%
102	M-OHMiami (OH)2-3MAC · 2-3	▼20	Compare	-4.7	0.0▼ 4.7	-5.7#101	+0.2#84	-3.5#110	-0.3#106	-1.1#107	0.13	0.15	40%	46%
103	UABUAB3-2American · 3-2	▲6	Compare	-5.2	-5.2no change	-10.2#113	-3.6#112	-2.3#97	+1.5#15	-0.8#89	0.02	0.13	41%	46%
104	CSUColorado State2-3Pac-12 · 2-3	▼12	Compare	-5.3	-1.8▼ 3.5	-6.9#103	+4.5#49	-8.5#136	-0.2#102	-1.1#102	0.20	0.23	44%	52%
105	OHIOOhio3-2MAC · 3-2	▲7	Compare	-5.3	-6.1▲ 0.8	-8.5#106	-0.2#91	-4.7#119	+0.3#67	-0.7#81	0.10	0.21	42%	44%
106	USMSouthern Miss1-3Sun Belt · 1-3	▼1	Compare	-5.4	-4.1▼ 1.3	-5.8#102	-2.5#103	-0.8#87	-0.9#126	-1.2#115	0.05	0.12	41%	42%
107	KENNKennesaw State1-3CUSA · 1-3	▲4	Compare	-5.4	-5.7▲ 0.3	-7.2#104	-1.2#97	-3.0#105	-0.1#93	-1.1#111	0.07	0.16	42%	44%
108	STANStanford2-3ACC · 2-3	▼11	Compare	-5.6	-2.7▼ 2.9	-7.9#105	+0.8#78	-5.4#126	-0.1#95	-0.8#94	0.16	0.20	39%	46%
109	ODUOld Dominion1-4Sun Belt · 1-4	▼14	Compare	-5.9	-2.4▼ 3.5	-9.0#108	-10.2#136	+5.0#43	+0.8#36	-1.5#132	-0.04	0.02	31%	37%
110	SDSUSan Diego State2-3Pac-12 · 2-3	–	Compare	-5.9	-5.3▼ 0.6	-10.8#114	-7.9#130	+1.6#71	+1.3#18	-1.0#99	-0.01	0.05	34%	43%
111	ARSTArkansas State2-3Sun Belt · 2-3	▲3	Compare	-6.7	-6.6▼ 0.1	-8.8#107	+0.5#81	-5.6#128	-0.4#113	-1.1#109	0.09	0.20	45%	47%
112	CCUCoastal Carolina1-4Sun Belt · 1-4	▲1	Compare	-6.9	-6.2▼ 0.7	-11.4#116	-3.0#108	-3.6#111	+1.5#14	-1.8#135	0.06	0.17	39%	45%
113	DELDelaware2-3CUSA · 2-3	▼14	Compare	-6.9	-3.2▼ 3.7	-10.1#111	-2.6#104	-3.2#108	0.0#86	-1.1#106	0.05	0.17	40%	44%
114	FIUFlorida International2-2CUSA · 2-2	▲1	Compare	-7.5	-7.5no change	-10.8#115	-8.1#131	+1.9#68	-0.4#111	-0.8#93	-0.05	0.09	37%	38%
115	WSUWashington State1-4Pac-12 · 1-4	▼17	Compare	-7.6	-3.0▼ 4.6	-9.9#110	-7.4#129	+1.7#70	-0.3#107	-1.5#128	-0.01	0.06	35%	42%
116	SJSUSan José State3-2Mountain West · 3-2	▲6	Compare	-8.4	-10.2▲ 1.8	-13.0#117	-6.8#123	-0.7#85	-0.2#98	-0.7#83	0.01	0.11	34%	43%
117	RICERice1-4American · 1-4	▲4	Compare	-8.5	-10.0▲ 1.5	-10.2#112	-3.2#110	-2.7#103	-1.2#132	-1.5#126	0.04	0.16	40%	43%
118	USASouth Alabama3-2Sun Belt · 3-2	▼2	Compare	-8.6	-8.2▼ 0.4	-13.7#118	+0.1#86	-8.0#135	0.0#83	-0.7#82	0.14	0.26	39%	47%
119	EMUEastern Michigan3-3MAC · 3-3	▲6	Compare	-9.3	-13.2▲ 3.9	-14.2#119	-3.5#111	-4.8#120	0.0#85	-1.1#112	0.04	0.20	40%	45%
120	NEVNevada1-3Mountain West · 1-3	▼3	Compare	-10.2	-9.2▼ 1.0	-18.3#124	-6.2#121	-4.3#117	+1.8#7	-1.4#125	-0.02	0.20	38%	44%
121	MOSTMissouri State1-3CUSA · 1-3	▼1	Compare	-10.3	-9.8▼ 0.5	-14.5#120	-3.7#113	-4.7#118	-0.8#125	-1.1#105	0.04	0.17	38%	47%
122	MRSHMarshall3-2Sun Belt · 3-2	▲1	Compare	-10.4	-10.8▲ 0.4	-16.3#122	+2.4#64	-11.8#138	-0.4#109	-0.6#73	0.16	0.32	43%	51%
123	CMUCentral Michigan3-2MAC · 3-2	▲4	Compare	-10.8	-13.3▲ 2.5	-17.7#123	-4.5#114	-5.8#129	0.0#88	-0.5#65	0.05	0.21	36%	47%
124	NMSUNew Mexico State2-3CUSA · 2-3	▲4	Compare	-11.6	-13.4▲ 1.8	-16.2#121	-6.8#124	-2.5#101	-1.0#128	-1.2#117	-0.03	0.15	38%	44%
125	MTSUMiddle Tennessee2-3CUSA · 2-3	▼7	Compare	-12.0	-9.5▼ 2.5	-19.1#125	-6.1#120	-4.9#122	+0.2#74	-1.2#113	0.01	0.18	36%	47%
126	WYOWyoming2-3Mountain West · 2-3	▼7	Compare	-12.4	-9.6▼ 2.8	-20.1#127	-6.6#122	-5.0#124	+0.5#52	-1.3#122	-0.02	0.17	37%	49%
127	WKUWestern Kentucky1-4CUSA · 1-4	▼3	Compare	-12.9	-12.2▼ 0.7	-20.4#128	-6.9#126	-4.9#121	+0.2#72	-1.3#118	-0.03	0.21	38%	44%
128	SACSacramento State1-4MAC · 1-4	▲3	Compare	-13.3	-14.6▲ 1.3	-21.3#129	-8.3#132	-4.0#116	+0.8#39	-1.8#134	-0.07	0.22	38%	41%
129	NIUNorthern Illinois0-4Mountain West · 0-4	▲1	Compare	-14.0	-13.9▼ 0.1	-19.6#126	-7.3#128	-4.0#115	-1.2#131	-1.5#127	-0.07	0.20	40%	43%
130	KENTKent State2-3MAC · 2-3	▲2	Compare	-14.2	-15.0▲ 0.8	-21.7#131	-9.4#134	-3.1#106	-0.7#122	-1.0#98	-0.05	0.15	33%	46%
131	BALLBall State1-4MAC · 1-4	▲2	Compare	-14.3	-16.2▲ 1.9	-22.7#133	-6.9#125	-6.2#131	+0.3#62	-1.5#129	0.01	0.25	34%	44%
132	HAWHawai'i1-4Mountain West · 1-4	▼3	Compare	-14.8	-13.6▼ 1.2	-23.4#134	-6.0#119	-7.5#133	+0.7#46	-1.9#136	0.00	0.23	37%	49%
133	BGSUBowling Green1-4MAC · 1-4	▲5	Compare	-15.2	-19.7▲ 4.5	-21.7#130	-10.5#137	-2.1#94	-1.1#130	-1.5#130	-0.10	0.13	35%	45%
134	AKRAkron1-4MAC · 1-4	▼8	Compare	-15.5	-13.2▼ 2.3	-22.2#132	-4.8#116	-8.0#134	-1.0#129	-1.6#133	-0.00	0.26	40%	47%
135	BUFBuffalo2-3MAC · 2-3	–	Compare	-15.7	-16.8▲ 1.1	-25.5#135	-9.2#133	-5.6#127	+0.3#66	-1.3#119	-0.05	0.23	34%	44%
136	CLTCharlotte0-5American · 0-5	–	Compare	-18.0	-17.2▼ 0.8	-27.9#137	-11.1#138	-5.0#123	+0.2#71	-2.1#138	-0.10	0.17	34%	48%
137	ULMUL Monroe0-5Sun Belt · 0-5	–	Compare	-19.4	-18.2▼ 1.2	-27.5#136	-6.9#127	-9.0#137	-1.4#133	-2.1#137	-0.04	0.26	39%	49%
138	UTEPUTEP1-4Mountain West · 1-4	▼4	Compare	-20.1	-16.6▼ 3.5	-29.4#138	-9.5#135	-7.5#132	-1.8#138	-1.3#120	-0.11	0.22	38%	50%

Tap a column name to sort. Small numbers next to each value are that team's national rank.

How to read the rating

+30.6 means about 30 points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field. Compare two teams' ratings to see who the computer thinks is better, and by about how much. Last Wk shows last week's rating, so you can tell whether a team actually improved or just passed a team that dropped.

Offense + defense + special teams + record

Each part is in points per game versus average, so they add up to the Power rating. A big defense number means opponents score far less than usual against them. Record (how impressive the record is for its schedule) gets only a small say, because in testing more weight made the rating worse at telling who's better.

Why it can differ from the résumé

A team can play great and still lose close games, or win ugly against a soft schedule. The Power Rankings judge how good a team is; the Résumé Rankings judge what it has earned.