College Football · 2026 · Week 3

StatboyRésumé Rankings.

What it's based on

Who has earned the best season so far?

Results only: who each team beat, where, and by how much. Wins count more the better the beaten team is, and they're re-checked every week as opponents win or lose. Losses cost more when they're lopsided or against weaker teams. Road wins, head-to-head results and strength of schedule all count, with a little extra for beating AP Top 25 teams. Record Strength counts too: how a team's record compares with what a typical Top 25 team would do against the same schedule. A conference's strength is judged partly by how it does outside its own games, so teams can't prop each other up. Polls, preseason hype and brand names don't.

Quality wins
Record Strength
Top 25 wins
Losses
Margin of victory
Road wins
Head-to-head
Strength of schedule

100% computer. No human votes or hand adjustments. Results through games of September 19. Updated every morning.

Share this graphicPreview ↗Graphic shows:Top 10 · Week 3 · Instagram-ready image

	Move	Compare										Best win
1	▲19	Compare	+0.99 #1	.759 #31	2	2-0	2	+14.3	+5.5	—	44%	LSU (2-1, #26)
2	▲4	Compare	+0.77 #3	.722 #57	0	2-0	1	+26.7	+21.0	—	44%	Kentucky (2-1, #46)
3	▲2	Compare	+0.36 #16	.799 #17	0	2-0	2	+32.3	+22.5	—	56%	Michigan State (2-1, #56)
4	▲3	Compare	+0.71 #4	.667 #81	0	2-0	2	+27.0	+16.0	—	44%	South Carolina (2-1, #48)
5	▲10	Compare	+0.78 #2	.787 #24	1	1-0	2	+25.7	+1.0	—	56%	Ohio State (2-1, #39)
6	▲15	Compare	+0.54 #5	.944 #1	0	1-0	2	+33.0	+5.0	—	67%	Auburn (2-1, #38)
7	▲3	Compare	+0.47 #10	.750 #42	0	2-0	1	+21.3	+9.5	—	44%	UCF (2-1, #40)
8	▲17	Compare	+0.50 #8	.750 #50	0	1-0	1	+34.0	+9.0	—	50%	Maryland (2-1, #42)
9	▼5	Compare	+0.39 #14	.722 #60	0	2-0	1	+17.7	+17.5	—	44%	California (2-1, #72)
10	▼2	Compare	+0.47 #9	.815 #15	1	1-0	2	+14.3	+7.0	—	56%	Oklahoma (2-1, #41)
11	▲8	Compare	+0.38 #15	.875 #9	0	1-0	2	+28.3	+11.0	—	67%	Arizona (2-1, #57)
12	▲15	Compare	+0.51 #7	.750 #38	0	2-0	1	+40.7	+26.0	—	50%	Wake Forest (2-1, #59)
13	▲27	Compare	+0.46 #12	.750 #51	1	1-0	1	+21.0	+11.0	—	50%	Virginia (2-1, #51)
14	▼11	Compare	+0.33 #18	.683 #72	0	1-0	2	+20.2	+7.0	—	46%	Louisiana (2-1, #70)
15	▼6	Compare	+0.43 #13	.731 #55	0	2-0	1	+15.3	+16.0	—	44%	Illinois (2-1, #52)
16	▼2	Compare	+0.20 #27	.676 #74	0	0-0	1	+35.0	—	—	44%	Marshall (2-1, #77)
17	▲1	Compare	+0.33 #17	.792 #22	0	1-0	1	+20.7	+14.0	—	50%	Oklahoma State (2-1, #54)
18	▲32	Compare	+0.20 #28	.917 #3	0	1-0	1	+25.0	+34.0	—	67%	Colorado (2-1, #86)
19	▲26	Compare	+0.51 #6	.750 #44	1	1-0	1	+12.0	+2.0	—	50%	Houston (2-1, #43)
20	▼4	Compare	+0.47 #11	.750 #39	0	1-0	1	+22.3	+17.0	—	50%	Troy (2-1, #62)
21	▲13	Compare	+0.30 #20	.583 #100	0	1-0	0	+33.7	+21.0	—	33%	Georgia Tech (1-2, #109)
22	▲6	Compare	+0.27 #22	.667 #82	0	0-0	0	+22.8	—	—	42%	Air Force (1-1, #73)
23	▲13	Compare	+0.29 #21	.542 #114	0	1-0	1	+32.7	+3.0	—	33%	Iowa State (2-1, #50)
24	▲17	Compare	+0.17 #29	.667 #78	0	0-0	0	+35.3	—	—	33%	Tulane (1-2, #89)
25	▼13	Compare	+0.15 #32	.361 #134	0	0-0	0	+43.0	—	—	17%	North Texas (1-2, #111)
26	▼25	Compare	-0.17 #40	.759 #30	0	1-1	1	+21.3	+16.5	-8.0	50%	Clemson (2-1, #66)
27	▲16	Compare	+0.27 #24	.444 #130	0	1-0	0	+46.0	+28.0	—	17%	Arkansas (1-2, #123)
28	▼4	Compare	+0.21 #26	.500 #123	0	1-0	0	+39.3	+33.0	—	17%	Arkansas (1-2, #123)
29	▼7	Compare	+0.15 #33	.750 #33	0	1-0	1	+25.0	+19.0	—	50%	Boston College (2-1, #81)
30	▲3	Compare	+0.08 #35	.412 #132	0	0-0	0	+34.7	—	—	17%	Ohio (1-2, #102)
31	▲8	Compare	+0.31 #19	.750 #48	0	1-0	1	+10.7	+4.0	—	50%	Delaware (2-1, #60)
32	▲14	Compare	+0.17 #30	.792 #20	0	0-0	1	+34.7	—	—	50%	Liberty (2-1, #64)
33	▼3	Compare	+0.27 #23	.778 #26	0	0-0	0	+18.7	—	—	42%	Army (1-1, #76)
34	▲8	Compare	+0.16 #31	.278 #136	0	1-0	0	+21.7	+16.0	—	0%	Rutgers (0-3, #130)
35	▲25	Compare	-0.16 #39	.861 #11	1	1-1	1	+17.7	+3.5	-3.0	67%	SMU (2-1, #55)
36	▲15	Compare	+0.14 #34	.500 #124	0	0-0	0	+16.0	—	—	17%	Washington State (1-2, #105)
37	▲11	Compare	+0.25 #25	.472 #127	0	0-0	0	+20.0	—	—	17%	East Carolina (1-2, #108)
38	▼27	Compare	-0.12 #38	.778 #25	0	1-1	1	+10.3	-2.0	-5.0	50%	Baylor (2-1, #49)
39	▲14	Compare	-0.42 #56	.648 #87	0	0-1	0	+36.0	-1.0	-1.0	33%	Ball State (1-2, #127)
40	▲19	Compare	-0.42 #55	.861 #12	0	0-1	1	+25.3	-5.0	-5.0	67%	Georgia State (2-1, #65)
41	▲14	Compare	-0.45 #63	.815 #16	0	0-1	1	+17.3	-7.0	-7.0	50%	New Mexico (2-1, #45)
42	▼19	Compare	-0.32 #47	.875 #10	0	0-1	1	+25.7	-9.0	-9.0	67%	UConn (2-1, #85)
43	▲1	Compare	-0.44 #60	.750 #37	0	0-1	0	+27.3	-2.0	-2.0	33%	Oregon State (1-2, #92)
44	▲12	Compare	-0.53 #74	.764 #29	0	0-1	0	+13.7	-1.0	-1.0	33%	Rice (1-2, #117)
45	▼7	Compare	-0.45 #62	.722 #58	0	0-1	1	+28.7	-8.0	—	67%	Central Michigan (2-1, #87)
46	▲59	Compare	+0.05 #36	.889 #8	1	1-1	1	+4.7	-9.0	-28.0	67%	Texas A&M (2-1, #47)
47	▼45	Compare	-0.47 #66	.667 #84	0	1-1	1	+22.7	+9.0	—	50%	Arizona State (2-1, #80)
48	▼11	Compare	-0.47 #68	.694 #69	0	0-1	0	+28.7	-7.0	-7.0	33%	Kent State (1-2, #128)
49	▲5	Compare	-0.46 #65	.556 #108	0	0-1	0	+19.0	-1.0	—	33%	Louisiana Tech (1-2, #107)
50	▲11	Compare	-0.44 #59	.542 #115	0	0-1	0	+24.3	-3.0	-3.0	0%	Bowling Green (0-3, #138)
51	▼38	Compare	-0.59 #75	.750 #49	0	1-1	0	+23.7	+7.5	-11.0	33%	NC State (1-2, #93)
52	▲5	Compare	-0.75 #82	.667 #77	0	0-1	0	+17.7	-4.0	-4.0	33%	UAB (1-2, #106)
53	▲5	Compare	-0.38 #51	.708 #63	0	0-1	1	+8.3	-7.0	—	75%	Memphis (3-1, #69)
54	▲11	Compare	-0.47 #67	.917 #4	1	1-0	1	+17.7	+8.0	-14.0	67%	Oregon (2-1, #61)
55	▼24	Compare	-0.18 #41	.611 #93	0	1-1	0	+13.0	-3.5	—	33%	Florida State (1-2, #88)
56	▼30	Compare	-0.18 #42	.713 #62	0	0-1	1	+7.0	-17.0	-17.0	46%	Toledo (2-1, #68)
57	▲10	Compare	-0.33 #48	.625 #89	0	0-1	0	+14.0	-11.0	-11.0	0%	Northern Illinois (0-3, #137)
58	▼29	Compare	-0.44 #58	.694 #68	0	1-1	1	+9.7	-1.5	—	67%	TCU (2-1, #63)
59	▼42	Compare	-0.26 #46	.667 #85	0	1-1	0	+3.7	-5.5	-13.0	33%	Purdue (1-2, #91)
60	▲9	Compare	-0.40 #53	.750 #36	0	0-1	0	+11.3	-9.0	—	33%	Coastal Carolina (1-2, #90)
61	▲5	Compare	-0.53 #73	.792 #21	0	0-1	1	+27.7	-8.0	—	67%	Boise State (2-1, #53)
62	▼10	Compare	-0.34 #49	.750 #45	0	0-1	0	+3.3	-10.0	-10.0	33%	Sam Houston (1-2, #94)
63	▲1	Compare	-0.71 #80	.556 #112	0	0-1	0	+25.0	-5.0	—	33%	Arkansas State (1-2, #112)
64	▲14	Compare	-0.59 #76	.708 #66	0	0-0	0	+10.0	—	—	33%	Ball State (1-2, #127)
65	▼33	Compare	-0.48 #70	.625 #91	0	0-1	0	+16.3	-14.0	—	33%	Kennesaw State (1-2, #120)
66	▲17	Compare	-0.06 #37	.667 #76	0	1-1	1	-6.0	-16.5	—	50%	North Carolina (2-1, #58)
67	▼32	Compare	-0.48 #69	.750 #35	0	0-1	0	+12.7	-18.0	-18.0	33%	Wyoming (1-2, #121)
68	▲5	Compare	-0.67 #79	.588 #98	0	0-1	0	+14.7	-10.0	—	33%	Temple (1-2, #95)
69	▲2	Compare	-0.51 #72	.525 #120	0	0-0	0	+7.5	—	—	33%	Arkansas State (1-2, #112)
70	▲15	Compare	-0.43 #57	.667 #80	0	0-1	0	+6.3	-19.0	-19.0	33%	UAB (1-2, #106)
71	▲26	Compare	-0.45 #61	.694 #67	0	0-1	0	+20.3	-25.0	-25.0	33%	Akron (1-2, #118)
72	▲14	Compare	-0.48 #71	.736 #53	0	1-1	0	+8.0	-9.0	-21.0	33%	Syracuse (1-2, #96)
73	▲4	Compare	-0.87 #87	.889 #7	0	0-0	0	+14.0	—	-6.0	—	none
74	▼25	Compare	-0.24 #44	.750 #47	0	0-1	0	+3.3	-24.0	-24.0	33%	Texas State (1-2, #110)
75	▲1	Compare	-0.77 #83	.454 #129	0	0-0	0	+8.7	—	—	33%	Ohio (1-2, #102)
76	▼2	Compare	-0.83 #84	.917 #2	0	0-0	0	+26.0	—	—	—	none
77	▲42	Compare	-0.39 #52	.741 #52	0	0-1	1	-12.3	-45.0	-45.0	50%	Middle Tennessee (2-1, #78)
78	▲2	Compare	-0.88 #88	.514 #121	0	0-0	0	+9.7	—	—	33%	Nevada (1-2, #126)
79	▲27	Compare	-0.41 #54	.642 #88	0	0-1	0	+7.7	-39.0	-39.0	38%	San José State (2-2, #101)
80	▲23	Compare	-0.26 #45	.569 #104	0	1-1	0	+14.0	-10.5	—	33%	Kansas (1-2, #100)
81	▲11	Compare	-0.63 #78	.597 #95	0	1-1	0	-2.0	-6.0	—	0%	Rutgers (0-3, #130)
82	▲18	Compare	-0.18 #43	.796 #18	0	0-1	0	-10.3	-45.0	-45.0	42%	Navy (1-1, #83)
83	▼4	Compare	-0.84 #85	.611 #92	0	0-0	0	+9.5	—	—	—	none
84	▲24	Compare	-0.36 #50	.653 #86	0	0-1	0	+14.3	-28.0	-28.0	25%	Eastern Michigan (1-3, #132)
85	▲16	Compare	-0.61 #77	.583 #101	0	0-1	0	+17.7	-24.0	—	33%	Southern Miss (1-2, #129)
86	▼39	Compare	-0.45 #64	.792 #19	0	1-1	0	-0.7	-16.5	-34.0	33%	Georgia Tech (1-2, #109)
87	▲29	Compare	-0.74 #81	.542 #113	0	0-0	0	-4.7	—	—	33%	Wyoming (1-2, #121)
88	▼25	Compare	-0.86 #86	.574 #102	0	0-2	0	0.0	-8.5	-14.0	33%	New Mexico State (1-2, #116)
89	▼14	Compare	-1.17 #96	.824 #13	0	0-2	1	-7.0	-12.5	-12.5	67%	South Alabama (2-1, #75)
90	▼20	Compare	-1.54 #119	.750 #34	0	0-1	0	+7.7	-7.0	-7.0	—	none
91	▼29	Compare	-1.31 #106	.722 #59	0	0-2	0	+3.0	-8.0	-14.0	—	none
92	▲29	Compare	-1.22 #100	.750 #41	0	0-2	0	+3.7	-12.0	-11.0	—	none
93	▲6	Compare	-1.12 #94	.750 #40	0	0-2	0	+14.3	-15.0	—	—	none
94	▲26	Compare	-1.74 #127	.750 #43	0	0-0	0	+16.7	—	-6.0	—	none
95	▼4	Compare	-1.43 #115	.694 #70	0	0-1	0	+1.7	-18.0	-18.0	—	none
96	▼9	Compare	-1.46 #117	.736 #54	0	0-2	0	+15.3	-8.5	-14.0	—	none
97	▼25	Compare	-1.55 #120	.676 #73	0	0-0	0	-1.0	—	—	33%	Buffalo (1-2, #122)
98	▲16	Compare	-1.28 #103	.903 #5	0	0-2	0	-3.7	-24.5	-45.0	—	none
99	▼17	Compare	-1.30 #105	.903 #6	0	0-1	0	+0.7	-18.0	-18.0	—	none
100	▼19	Compare	-1.37 #110	.708 #65	0	0-2	0	+7.0	-12.0	-17.0	—	none
101	▼33	Compare	-1.38 #112	.602 #94	0	0-1	0	-4.0	-16.0	-16.0	25%	Eastern Michigan (1-3, #132)
102	▲13	Compare	-1.44 #116	.593 #97	0	0-1	0	-10.3	-28.0	—	50%	Jacksonville State (2-2, #103)
103	▲23	Compare	-1.59 #123	.534 #117	0	0-0	0	+4.5	—	-26.0	33%	Georgia Southern (1-2, #104)
104	▼20	Compare	-1.57 #121	.472 #128	0	0-1	0	+4.0	-15.0	—	—	none
105	▲26	Compare	-1.21 #99	.792 #23	0	0-2	0	0.0	-20.5	-27.0	—	none
106	▼13	Compare	-1.58 #122	.444 #131	0	0-1	0	-6.7	-19.0	—	0%	UL Monroe (0-3, #136)
107	▼3	Compare	-0.94 #91	.556 #110	0	0-2	0	+8.7	-24.0	—	—	none
108	▲24	Compare	-0.99 #92	.713 #61	0	0-1	0	-12.7	-38.0	-38.0	33%	Old Dominion (1-2, #119)
109	▲16	Compare	-1.43 #114	.708 #64	0	0-2	0	+3.7	-11.0	-21.0	—	none
110	▲24	Compare	-1.16 #95	.676 #75	0	0-1	0	-14.3	-52.0	-52.0	33%	North Texas (1-2, #111)
111	▼15	Compare	-1.20 #97	.478 #126	0	0-1	0	-4.0	-36.0	-36.0	33%	UNLV (1-2, #113)
112	▼24	Compare	-1.41 #113	.556 #107	0	0-1	0	+1.0	-24.0	—	—	none
113	▲9	Compare	-1.60 #124	.389 #133	0	0-0	0	-9.7	—	—	33%	Hawai'i (1-2, #115)
114	▲4	Compare	-1.21 #98	.731 #56	0	0-2	0	-19.0	-33.5	-33.5	33%	Hawai'i (1-2, #115)
115	▲8	Compare	-1.80 #128	.247 #137	0	0-1	0	-5.0	-10.0	—	33%	New Mexico State (1-2, #116)
116	▲8	Compare	-1.64 #125	.139 #138	0	0-1	0	+3.3	-17.0	—	—	none
117	▼5	Compare	-1.23 #101	.764 #28	0	0-1	0	-10.3	-52.0	-52.0	—	none
118	▼24	Compare	-1.34 #108	.569 #103	0	0-2	0	-7.0	-28.0	—	—	none
119	▼24	Compare	-1.37 #111	.597 #96	0	0-1	0	-1.7	-23.0	-23.0	—	none
120	▼31	Compare	-1.29 #104	.667 #79	0	0-1	0	0.0	-33.0	-33.0	—	none
121	▼23	Compare	-1.84 #129	.542 #116	0	0-0	0	-9.3	—	—	—	none
122	▼32	Compare	-1.36 #109	.556 #109	0	0-1	0	-17.0	-42.0	-42.0	—	none
123	▼12	Compare	-0.90 #89	.750 #32	0	0-2	0	-14.7	-30.5	—	—	none
124	▼22	Compare	-1.06 #93	.778 #27	0	0-2	0	-15.0	-43.0	-35.0	—	none
125	▼12	Compare	-1.53 #118	.583 #99	0	0-1	0	-7.3	-50.0	—	—	none
126	▼17	Compare	-1.85 #130	.361 #135	0	0-0	0	+5.0	—	—	0%	Western Kentucky (0-3, #135)
127	▼20	Compare	-1.23 #102	.569 #105	0	0-1	0	-21.7	-53.0	—	—	none
128	▼11	Compare	-0.94 #90	.569 #106	0	0-2	0	-30.7	-56.5	—	—	none
129	▼19	Compare	-1.33 #107	.556 #111	0	0-1	0	-5.7	-35.0	—	—	none
130	▼2	Compare	-2.44 #136	.685 #71	0	0-2	0	-10.0	-7.0	-7.0	—	none
131	▼4	Compare	-2.15 #132	.750 #46	0	0-2	0	-15.7	-17.5	—	—	none
132	▼3	Compare	-2.46 #137	.491 #125	0	0-2	0	-16.8	-36.0	—	25%	Sacramento State (1-3, #133)
133	▼3	Compare	-2.69 #138	.528 #118	0	0-0	0	-6.5	—	-21.0	—	none
134	▲2	Compare	-2.31 #135	.819 #14	0	0-1	0	-13.0	-32.0	-32.0	—	none
135	–	Compare	-1.65 #126	.528 #119	0	0-2	0	-41.0	-44.0	-38.0	—	none
136	▼3	Compare	-2.23 #134	.500 #122	0	0-1	0	-19.3	-49.0	-49.0	—	none
137	–	Compare	-2.00 #131	.667 #83	0	0-2	0	-23.0	-32.5	-40.0	—	none
138	–	Compare	-2.22 #133	.625 #90	0	0-2	0	-34.7	-48.5	—	—	none

Tap a team to see its full game log. Tap a column name to sort.

Wins over good teams count most

Every win is worth more the better the beaten team is right now. Two wins over top-30 teams beat four wins over nobody.

Losses depend on who and how bad

A close loss to a top team costs little. Blowouts and losses to bad teams cost a lot.

Record Strength

Against this exact schedule, how many wins would a typical Top 25 team expect? Record Strength is a team's actual wins minus that number. +1.0 means a full win better than a Top 25 team would likely have done.

Re-checked every week

Opponents' results update every Sunday, so a win can gain or lose value even on a bye week. Road wins count more and home losses cost more. Head-to-head breaks close calls, but only for a team with no more losses than the team it beat.