College Football · 2026 · Week 4

StatboyRésumé Rankings.

What it's based on

Who has earned the best season so far?

Results only: who each team beat, where, and by how much. Wins count more the better the beaten team is, and they're re-checked every week as opponents win or lose. Losses cost more when they're lopsided or against weaker teams. Road wins, head-to-head results and strength of schedule all count, with a little extra for beating AP Top 25 teams. Record Strength counts too: how a team's record compares with what a typical Top 25 team would do against the same schedule. A conference's strength is judged partly by how it does outside its own games, so teams can't prop each other up. Polls, preseason hype and brand names don't.

Quality wins
Record Strength
Top 25 wins
Losses
Margin of victory
Road wins
Head-to-head
Strength of schedule

100% computer. No human votes or hand adjustments. Results through games of September 26. Updated every morning.

Share this graphicPreview ↗Graphic shows:Top 10 · Week 4 · Instagram-ready image

	Move	Compare											Best win
1	▲5	Compare	+0.89 #4	.894 #1	2	1	2-0	3	+30.8	+14.5	+14.5	75%	Ole Miss (3-1, #8)
2	▲3	Compare	+1.30 #1	.843 #4	0	2	2-0	3	+20.0	+2.0	—	69%	Ohio State (3-1, #26)
3	▼1	Compare	+0.99 #3	.750 #17	0	0	3-0	1	+27.8	+24.3	—	56%	Kentucky (3-1, #44)
4	▼1	Compare	+0.65 #7	.661 #56	0	0	3-0	1	+34.0	+28.0	—	44%	Wisconsin (3-1, #41)
5	▼1	Compare	+1.04 #2	.699 #35	0	1	3-0	2	+22.0	+13.0	—	50%	Missouri (3-1, #33)
6	▲21	Compare	+0.64 #8	.639 #71	0	0	2-0	0	+41.5	+28.0	—	42%	Oklahoma (2-2, #71)
7	▲5	Compare	+0.52 #11	.744 #22	0	0	2-0	1	+42.8	+26.0	—	58%	Wake Forest (3-1, #37)
8	▼7	Compare	+0.56 #10	.707 #29	1	2	2-1	1	+4.8	-4.3	-8.0	42%	LSU (3-1, #9)
9	▲17	Compare	+0.03 #30	.694 #37	0	1	2-1	1	+23.2	+20.7	-8.0	53%	Clemson (3-1, #48)
10	▼3	Compare	+0.43 #14	.753 #16	0	0	2-0	1	+30.8	+9.5	—	53%	UCF (3-1, #30)
11	▲17	Compare	+0.51 #12	.642 #67	0	0	2-0	0	+33.0	+23.5	—	42%	Iowa State (2-2, #66)
12	▼3	Compare	+0.58 #9	.616 #89	0	0	3-0	0	+26.0	+28.7	—	38%	Maryland (2-2, #83)
13	▲6	Compare	+0.70 #5	.667 #50	0	1	1-0	1	+17.8	+2.0	—	50%	Houston (3-1, #32)
14	▲11	Compare	+0.40 #17	.685 #40	0	0	1-0	1	+33.8	+6.0	—	47%	Northwestern (2-1, #35)
15	▼4	Compare	+0.40 #18	.759 #14	0	0	1-0	1	+28.3	+11.0	—	63%	Arizona (3-1, #47)
16	▲7	Compare	+0.66 #6	.605 #95	0	1	2-0	1	+24.8	+2.0	—	42%	Michigan (3-1, #36)
17	▲37	Compare	-0.25 #41	.827 #5	1	1	2-0	2	+17.5	+12.5	+8.0	75%	Oregon (3-1, #18)
18	▲43	Compare	+0.03 #31	.859 #2	0	1	1-1	2	+24.2	+3.0	-8.0	78%	USC (4-1, #29)
19	▲11	Compare	+0.32 #19	.557 #107	0	0	1-0	0	+30.5	+18.0	—	33%	Michigan State (2-2, #68)
20	▲9	Compare	+0.42 #15	.778 #11	0	0	2-0	1	+20.0	+12.0	—	58%	Kansas State (3-1, #43)
21	▼6	Compare	+0.41 #16	.679 #43	0	0	2-0	0	+25.2	+16.0	—	50%	Illinois (2-2, #75)
22	▼14	Compare	+0.43 #13	.642 #68	0	0	2-0	0	+27.2	+8.0	—	42%	Boston College (2-2, #80)
23	▼1	Compare	+0.25 #21	.664 #54	0	0	0-0	2	+22.8	—	—	49%	Air Force (2-1, #65)
24	▲8	Compare	+0.31 #20	.617 #85	0	0	0-0	1	+32.5	—	—	42%	Liberty (3-1, #50)
25	▲13	Compare	+0.19 #23	.782 #9	0	0	2-1	2	+9.2	+0.7	-5.0	58%	Baylor (3-1, #38)
26	▲13	Compare	-0.22 #36	.669 #48	0	0	1-1	0	+32.8	+11.0	-1.0	42%	Illinois (2-2, #75)
27	▲7	Compare	+0.18 #24	.432 #136	0	0	1-0	0	+23.5	+16.0	—	23%	Rutgers (1-3, #113)
28	▲5	Compare	+0.20 #22	.617 #87	0	0	0-0	1	+16.0	—	—	39%	Army (2-1, #64)
29	▼15	Compare	-0.29 #45	.702 #34	0	0	1-1	2	+13.4	-3.5	-14.0	56%	Louisiana (3-1, #56)
30	▲10	Compare	-0.23 #39	.778 #13	0	0	1-1	1	+21.0	+1.5	-5.0	63%	Georgia State (3-1, #54)
31	▲22	Compare	-0.23 #37	.753 #15	0	0	0-1	1	+12.5	-7.0	-7.0	63%	Memphis (3-1, #58)
32	▲11	Compare	-0.14 #33	.660 #57	0	0	0-1	0	+24.0	-2.0	-2.0	38%	Oregon State (2-2, #70)
33	▼13	Compare	+0.04 #29	.657 #58	0	0	1-1	0	+15.0	+5.0	-7.0	42%	Troy (2-2, #88)
34	▼13	Compare	-0.32 #47	.583 #99	0	0	1-1	0	+24.5	+9.0	-3.0	25%	Georgia Tech (1-3, #119)
35	▼17	Compare	-0.26 #42	.750 #18	0	0	1-1	0	+14.7	+14.0	-6.0	50%	Colorado (2-2, #86)
36	▼26	Compare	-0.23 #38	.637 #75	0	1	1-1	0	+10.5	+3.0	-1.0	42%	Oklahoma (2-2, #71)
37	▲22	Compare	+0.12 #25	.639 #74	0	1	2-1	0	+3.5	-2.7	-13.0	33%	Louisville (2-2, #59)
38	▲11	Compare	-0.34 #48	.630 #76	0	0	1-1	0	+16.8	+4.5	-1.0	42%	Colorado (2-2, #86)
39	▼26	Compare	-0.43 #50	.679 #45	0	1	1-1	1	+11.5	-3.0	-17.0	50%	Virginia (3-1, #40)
40	▲11	Compare	-0.63 #61	.667 #52	0	0	1-1	0	+27.5	+7.5	—	50%	NC State (2-2, #78)
41	▲43	Compare	+0.08 #26	.738 #23	0	1	1-1	1	+11.8	-12.0	-28.0	58%	Penn State (3-1, #42)
42	▼26	Compare	-0.66 #63	.653 #62	0	0	0-1	1	+25.2	-4.0	—	50%	Marshall (3-1, #69)
43	▼19	Compare	-0.57 #60	.679 #44	0	0	0-1	0	+25.2	-5.0	-5.0	38%	Tulane (2-2, #77)
44	▲2	Compare	+0.05 #28	.738 #24	0	1	1-1	0	+9.5	-9.0	-28.0	50%	Texas A&M (2-2, #72)
45	▼14	Compare	-0.27 #44	.685 #42	0	0	1-1	0	+6.5	-1.0	-6.0	50%	NC State (2-2, #78)
46	▼29	Compare	-0.44 #51	.654 #61	1	0	1-1	1	+8.5	-7.0	+14.0	50%	Oklahoma State (3-1, #17)
47	▲10	Compare	-0.20 #34	.549 #111	0	0	0-1	0	+13.0	-11.0	-11.0	13%	Washington State (1-3, #115)
48	▲18	Compare	+0.05 #27	.670 #47	0	0	2-1	1	-1.0	-6.3	-41.0	47%	North Carolina (2-1, #51)
49	▼4	Compare	-0.43 #49	.503 #121	0	0	0-1	0	+27.5	-8.0	—	38%	Central Michigan (2-2, #106)
50	▲14	Compare	-0.48 #56	.556 #109	0	0	0-0	0	+11.8	—	-7.0	25%	Coastal Carolina (1-3, #117)
51	▲7	Compare	-0.47 #55	.657 #59	0	0	1-1	0	+9.7	-1.5	—	50%	TCU (2-2, #73)
52	▲3	Compare	-0.31 #46	.519 #118	0	0	1-1	0	+12.2	-3.5	—	38%	Florida State (2-2, #76)
53	▲21	Compare	-0.09 #32	.793 #8	0	0	0-1	0	+6.0	-24.0	-24.0	50%	Colorado State (2-2, #82)
54	▲11	Compare	-0.53 #58	.469 #128	0	0	0-1	0	+17.5	-14.0	—	13%	Kennesaw State (1-3, #122)
55	▲16	Compare	-0.23 #40	.704 #32	0	0	1-1	1	+16.0	-11.0	-25.0	50%	Washington (3-1, #61)
56	▲14	Compare	-0.46 #54	.512 #119	0	0	0-1	0	+11.5	-19.0	—	25%	UAB (2-2, #93)
57	▲11	Compare	-0.64 #62	.486 #127	0	0	0-1	0	+17.2	-10.0	—	25%	San Diego State (1-3, #114)
58	▲11	Compare	-0.48 #57	.627 #79	0	0	0-0	0	+7.5	—	—	50%	Arkansas State (2-2, #102)
59	▼24	Compare	-1.05 #75	.707 #30	0	1	1-2	1	+12.5	+1.3	-3.0	75%	SMU (3-1, #52)
60	▼23	Compare	-0.46 #53	.457 #133	0	0	0-1	0	+12.5	-10.0	—	25%	East Carolina (2-2, #101)
61	▼25	Compare	-0.72 #65	.543 #113	0	0	0-1	0	+11.2	-3.0	—	25%	Washington State (1-3, #115)
62	▲20	Compare	-0.21 #35	.606 #94	0	0	0-1	0	-0.8	-45.0	-45.0	28%	Florida International (2-2, #85)
63	▲16	Compare	-0.45 #52	.564 #105	0	0	0-1	0	+9.2	-39.0	—	32%	San José State (2-2, #100)
64	▲12	Compare	-0.77 #67	.639 #70	0	0	0-0	0	+18.7	—	—	25%	Temple (1-3, #116)
65	▲8	Compare	-0.82 #71	.620 #82	0	0	0-0	0	+10.3	—	-6.0	25%	Nevada (1-3, #124)
66	▼16	Compare	-1.06 #78	.654 #60	0	0	0-2	0	+14.8	-8.5	-8.5	0%	Bowling Green (0-4, #136)
67	▲13	Compare	-0.27 #43	.486 #125	0	0	1-1	0	+14.0	-10.5	—	33%	Kansas (1-2, #97)
68	▼12	Compare	-0.82 #70	.730 #26	0	0	0-2	1	+0.8	-17.5	-17.5	58%	Toledo (3-1, #57)
69	▲8	Compare	-0.54 #59	.562 #106	0	0	0-1	0	-9.0	-45.0	—	38%	Middle Tennessee (2-2, #99)
70	▲22	Compare	-1.05 #76	.642 #66	0	0	0-2	0	+9.2	-12.0	-11.0	25%	UTEP (1-3, #132)
71	▼30	Compare	-0.68 #64	.676 #46	0	0	0-2	1	+6.0	-17.5	-28.0	50%	New Mexico (3-1, #49)
72	▼25	Compare	-0.82 #69	.649 #65	0	0	1-2	1	+9.8	-3.7	-29.0	46%	Arizona State (2-1, #67)
73	▼10	Compare	-1.37 #94	.630 #78	0	0	0-2	0	+16.8	-6.5	—	50%	Arkansas State (2-2, #102)
74	▼26	Compare	-0.82 #68	.799 #6	0	0	0-2	0	+13.8	-19.0	-19.0	50%	Kent State (2-2, #108)
75	▼23	Compare	-1.14 #87	.708 #28	0	0	0-2	0	+7.5	-13.5	-4.0	50%	UAB (2-2, #93)
76	▲12	Compare	-0.98 #73	.614 #90	0	0	0-2	0	+6.8	-8.5	-14.0	25%	New Mexico State (1-3, #129)
77	▲12	Compare	-1.20 #89	.639 #73	0	0	0-2	0	-4.5	-12.5	-14.0	38%	South Alabama (2-2, #92)
78	▲15	Compare	-1.11 #81	.704 #33	0	0	0-2	1	+13.2	-15.0	—	75%	App State (3-1, #60)
79	▲44	Compare	-0.72 #66	.852 #3	0	0	0-2	1	-4.0	-30.5	-30.5	75%	Tulsa (3-1, #46)
80	▲1	Compare	-1.37 #96	.744 #21	0	0	1-2	0	-3.2	-6.3	-13.0	25%	Rutgers (1-3, #113)
81	▲17	Compare	-1.09 #80	.796 #7	0	0	0-2	0	-2.0	-24.5	-24.5	50%	UConn (2-2, #105)
82	▼15	Compare	-1.22 #90	.735 #25	0	0	0-1	0	+6.0	-18.0	-18.0	50%	Wyoming (2-2, #111)
83	▼41	Compare	-1.15 #88	.747 #19	0	0	0-2	0	+6.5	-30.0	-30.0	50%	UConn (2-2, #105)
84	▼40	Compare	-1.23 #91	.605 #96	0	0	0-1	0	+4.0	-1.0	—	25%	Rice (1-3, #121)
85	▲12	Compare	-1.65 #108	.696 #36	0	0	0-0	0	+3.5	—	—	50%	Buffalo (2-2, #109)
86	–	Compare	-1.06 #77	.543 #112	0	0	1-2	0	-3.0	-14.3	—	25%	Georgia Tech (1-3, #119)
87	▼27	Compare	-1.13 #85	.580 #100	0	0	0-2	0	-1.2	-24.0	—	25%	Coastal Carolina (1-3, #117)
88	▼26	Compare	-1.28 #92	.463 #131	0	0	0-1	0	-0.2	-10.0	—	25%	Sam Houston (1-3, #118)
89	▼17	Compare	-1.31 #93	.685 #39	0	0	1-2	0	+2.5	-10.7	-21.0	33%	Syracuse (1-2, #96)
90	▲20	Compare	-1.12 #82	.781 #10	0	0	0-1	0	+2.5	-52.0	-52.0	50%	North Texas (2-2, #91)
91	▲20	Compare	-1.14 #86	.651 #64	0	0	0-1	0	+9.2	-36.0	-36.0	50%	UNLV (2-2, #107)
92	▼17	Compare	-1.37 #95	.608 #92	0	0	0-1	0	+0.5	-24.0	—	50%	Ohio (2-2, #94)
93	▲13	Compare	-1.49 #102	.451 #134	0	0	0-1	0	-4.0	-19.0	—	17%	Navy (1-2, #98)
94	▲8	Compare	-1.44 #99	.639 #72	0	0	0-1	1	-0.8	-28.0	-28.0	60%	Jacksonville State (3-2, #95)
95	▲8	Compare	-1.62 #106	.595 #97	0	0	0-0	0	+5.6	—	-26.0	38%	Middle Tennessee (2-2, #99)
96	–	Compare	-1.48 #101	.685 #41	0	0	0-2	0	+15.3	-8.5	-14.0	—	none
97	▲3	Compare	-1.38 #97	.579 #101	0	0	0-2	0	+7.0	-12.0	—	—	none
98	▼15	Compare	-1.76 #110	.486 #126	0	0	0-0	0	+5.0	—	—	—	none
99	▼21	Compare	-1.78 #111	.503 #120	0	0	0-0	0	+4.8	—	—	25%	Nevada (1-3, #124)
100	▲1	Compare	-1.45 #100	.607 #93	0	0	0-1	0	-4.0	-16.0	—	40%	Eastern Michigan (2-3, #130)
101	▲7	Compare	-1.09 #79	.651 #63	0	0	0-1	0	-1.2	-38.0	-38.0	25%	Old Dominion (1-3, #126)
102	▲10	Compare	-1.44 #98	.500 #122	0	0	0-1	0	+1.5	-24.0	—	25%	Kennesaw State (1-3, #122)
103	▲4	Compare	-0.94 #72	.664 #53	0	0	0-2	0	+8.7	-24.0	-31.0	—	none
104	▲10	Compare	-1.12 #84	.630 #77	0	0	1-2	0	-12.5	-20.0	-33.5	25%	Georgia Tech (1-3, #119)
105	▼20	Compare	-1.57 #104	.469 #129	0	0	0-1	0	+12.5	-24.0	—	25%	Southern Miss (1-3, #131)
106	▼19	Compare	-1.12 #83	.691 #38	0	0	0-1	0	-15.8	-49.0	-49.0	50%	Wyoming (2-2, #111)
107	▲6	Compare	-1.57 #105	.463 #132	0	0	0-0	0	-0.2	—	—	25%	Hawai'i (1-3, #128)
108	▲20	Compare	-0.98 #74	.531 #114	0	0	0-2	0	-19.8	-56.5	—	25%	Ball State (1-3, #127)
109	▲13	Compare	-1.56 #103	.574 #102	0	0	0-1	0	-12.0	-42.0	—	—	none
110	▼19	Compare	-1.64 #107	.778 #12	0	0	0-3	0	-7.5	-18.3	-26.5	—	none
111	▲10	Compare	-1.82 #112	.432 #135	0	0	0-0	0	-2.8	—	—	25%	Hawai'i (1-3, #128)
112	▼8	Compare	-2.22 #121	.620 #83	0	0	0-2	0	-0.5	-14.5	—	—	none
113	▲17	Compare	-2.51 #129	.663 #55	0	0	0-2	0	+5.2	-7.0	—	—	none
114	▼15	Compare	-2.01 #115	.747 #20	0	0	0-1	0	-5.8	-18.0	-15.5	—	none
115	▼10	Compare	-2.00 #114	.617 #88	0	0	0-3	0	-2.5	-17.0	—	—	none
116	▼21	Compare	-2.45 #128	.593 #98	0	0	0-1	0	+0.2	-18.0	—	—	none
117	▼27	Compare	-2.63 #131	.568 #104	0	0	0-1	0	+1.5	-7.0	—	—	none
118	▼24	Compare	-2.25 #123	.617 #86	0	0	0-1	0	+3.8	-35.0	-35.0	—	none
119	▼10	Compare	-2.37 #126	.488 #124	0	0	0-3	0	+1.0	-9.7	—	—	none
120	▲5	Compare	-2.15 #118	.556 #110	0	0	0-2	0	-8.0	-30.0	—	—	none
121	▼4	Compare	-2.08 #117	.627 #80	0	0	0-1	0	-11.2	-52.0	-52.0	—	none
122	▼2	Compare	-2.29 #124	.519 #117	0	0	0-1	0	-0.8	-33.0	—	—	none
123	▲8	Compare	-2.04 #116	.667 #51	0	0	0-2	0	-9.0	-17.5	-33.0	50%	Troy (2-2, #88)
124	▲2	Compare	-2.82 #133	.463 #130	0	0	0-0	0	+3.0	—	—	25%	Western Kentucky (1-3, #125)
125	▲10	Compare	-1.66 #109	.623 #81	0	0	0-2	0	-19.5	-44.0	-44.0	—	none
126	▼7	Compare	-2.19 #120	.716 #27	0	0	0-1	0	-7.8	-23.0	-24.5	—	none
127	–	Compare	-2.18 #119	.556 #108	0	0	0-1	0	-19.5	-53.0	—	—	none
128	▼13	Compare	-2.76 #132	.368 #138	0	0	0-1	0	-8.0	-10.0	—	25%	New Mexico State (1-3, #129)
129	▼13	Compare	-2.58 #130	.383 #137	0	0	0-1	0	-3.5	-17.0	—	—	none
130	▲2	Compare	-2.39 #127	.520 #116	0	0	0-2	0	-8.2	-36.0	—	20%	Sacramento State (1-4, #134)
131	▼2	Compare	-2.24 #122	.500 #123	0	0	0-1	0	-5.0	-35.0	-35.0	—	none
132	▼8	Compare	-1.85 #113	.528 #115	0	0	0-2	0	-17.8	-43.0	—	—	none
133	▼15	Compare	-2.30 #125	.568 #103	0	0	0-2	0	-12.2	-28.0	—	—	none
134	▼1	Compare	-3.67 #138	.641 #69	0	0	0-0	0	-11.0	—	-21.0	—	none
135	▲2	Compare	-2.91 #134	.667 #49	0	0	0-2	0	-22.5	-32.5	-40.0	—	none
136	▲2	Compare	-3.16 #135	.704 #31	0	0	0-2	0	-28.0	-48.5	-49.0	—	none
137	▼3	Compare	-3.32 #137	.608 #91	0	0	0-1	0	-16.5	-32.0	-32.0	—	none
138	▼2	Compare	-3.23 #136	.620 #84	0	0	0-1	0	-21.5	-49.0	-49.0	—	none

Tap a team to see its full game log. Tap a column name to sort.

Wins over good teams count most

Every win is worth more the better the beaten team is right now. Two wins over top-30 teams beat four wins over nobody.

Losses depend on who and how bad

A close loss to a top team costs little. Blowouts and losses to bad teams cost a lot.

Record Strength

Against this exact schedule, how many wins would a typical Top 25 team expect? Record Strength is a team's actual wins minus that number. +1.0 means a full win better than a Top 25 team would likely have done.

Re-checked every week

Opponents' results update every Sunday, so a win can gain or lose value even on a bye week. Road wins count more and home losses cost more. Head-to-head breaks close calls, but only for a team with no more losses than the team it beat.