College Football · 2026 · Week 6

StatboyRésumé Rankings.

What it's based on

Who has earned the best season so far?

Results only: who each team beat, where, and by how much. Wins count more the better the beaten team is, and they're re-checked every week as opponents win or lose. Losses cost more when they're lopsided or against weaker teams. Road wins, head-to-head results and strength of schedule all count, with a little extra for beating AP Top 25 teams. Record Strength counts too: how a team's record compares with what a typical Top 25 team would do against the same schedule. A conference's strength is judged partly by how it does outside its own games, so teams can't prop each other up. Polls, preseason hype and brand names don't.

Quality wins
Record Strength
Top 25 wins
Losses
Margin of victory
Road wins
Head-to-head
Strength of schedule

100% computer. No human votes or hand adjustments. Results through games of October 10. Updated every morning.

Share this graphicPreview ↗Graphic shows:Top 10 · Week 6 · Instagram-ready image

	Move	Compare											Best win
1	▲7	Compare	+1.53 #1	.656 #27	1	1	4-0	2	+32.2	+20.8	+3.0	52%	Alabama (5-1, #2)
2	▼1	Compare	+1.12 #2	.761 #2	2	1	4-1	3	+23.5	+20.6	+19.3	65%	Mississippi State (4-1, #10)
3	–	Compare	+1.09 #3	.617 #49	0	0	5-0	2	+33.0	+29.2	—	46%	Wisconsin (4-1, #32)
4	–	Compare	+0.74 #10	.673 #20	1	0	3-0	2	+39.8	+26.7	+13.0	57%	Wake Forest (5-1, #17)
5	▲4	Compare	+1.09 #4	.654 #28	2	0	3-0	3	+28.3	+13.7	+4.5	57%	Northwestern (4-1, #23)
6	▼4	Compare	+0.75 #9	.734 #4	2	2	2-1	3	+15.4	+0.3	+2.0	73%	Ohio State (5-1, #12)
7	▲8	Compare	+1.01 #7	.631 #44	0	1	4-0	1	+21.2	+22.0	—	45%	Oregon (3-2, #26)
8	▲3	Compare	+0.91 #8	.654 #29	1	0	3-0	1	+21.2	+10.7	+11.0	53%	Arizona (5-1, #20)
9	▼2	Compare	+1.03 #5	.651 #32	1	1	2-0	2	+18.6	+12.0	+2.0	53%	Houston (5-1, #15)
10	▼5	Compare	+0.70 #11	.652 #30	1	1	3-1	2	+11.0	+1.5	-13.0	50%	Missouri (5-1, #11)
11	▼5	Compare	+0.60 #13	.660 #25	0	1	3-1	2	+18.2	+14.8	-7.0	54%	Florida (4-2, #29)
12	▲1	Compare	+0.25 #19	.586 #70	0	1	3-1	1	+29.5	+17.0	-1.0	43%	Iowa (5-1, #27)
13	▲17	Compare	+1.01 #6	.701 #8	1	2	3-1	2	+6.7	-4.0	-13.5	58%	LSU (4-2, #18)
14	–	Compare	+0.68 #12	.554 #91	0	0	3-0	0	+29.8	+21.3	—	39%	Iowa State (3-3, #57)
15	▲5	Compare	+0.42 #16	.687 #14	0	0	2-1	2	+20.8	+9.0	-2.0	53%	Oregon State (4-2, #46)
16	–	Compare	+0.54 #14	.583 #73	1	2	3-1	1	+10.8	+5.5	+8.0	42%	LSU (4-2, #18)
17	▲15	Compare	+0.44 #15	.609 #58	0	1	4-1	0	+15.3	+14.0	-13.0	40%	Louisville (3-3, #50)
18	▼1	Compare	-0.52 #40	.702 #7	0	1	2-2	2	+23.5	+15.2	-4.5	57%	Clemson (3-2, #51)
19	▲2	Compare	+0.41 #17	.577 #78	0	0	0-0	1	+26.8	—	—	47%	Liberty (5-1, #39)
20	▲7	Compare	-0.05 #25	.588 #69	0	0	2-1	1	+16.7	+12.3	-11.0	37%	Cincinnati (4-1, #41)
21	▲3	Compare	+0.01 #21	.577 #79	0	0	3-1	1	+19.2	+8.8	-3.0	38%	Auburn (3-2, #42)
22	▲7	Compare	-0.05 #26	.671 #21	0	0	0-1	3	+12.7	-7.0	—	63%	Memphis (5-1, #40)
23	–	Compare	0.00 #22	.610 #55	0	0	2-1	0	+19.2	+16.3	-6.0	36%	Penn State (3-3, #73)
24	▼6	Compare	-0.12 #27	.623 #47	0	0	2-1	1	+24.0	+13.3	-3.0	42%	Ohio (4-2, #67)
25	▲3	Compare	-0.18 #29	.625 #46	0	1	3-0	1	+16.8	+13.0	—	53%	Oregon (3-2, #26)
26	▼7	Compare	-0.61 #44	.828 #1	1	1	1-2	2	+19.0	+1.3	-1.0	85%	Boise State (5-1, #22)
27	▲7	Compare	+0.31 #18	.586 #71	0	1	3-1	1	+16.5	+1.0	-17.0	40%	Michigan (3-2, #47)
28	▼2	Compare	0.00 #23	.600 #63	0	0	3-1	2	+11.3	+1.2	—	51%	Louisiana (4-2, #61)
29	▼17	Compare	-0.40 #35	.728 #5	1	1	2-2	3	+12.7	-4.5	-2.0	73%	Ole Miss (4-1, #16)
30	▼20	Compare	-0.14 #28	.617 #50	0	0	3-1	1	+20.2	+4.2	—	52%	UCF (3-3, #52)
31	▲2	Compare	-0.26 #31	.632 #42	0	0	2-1	2	+20.6	+15.0	—	53%	Louisiana Tech (3-2, #60)
32	▼1	Compare	+0.14 #20	.642 #36	0	1	2-1	1	+15.0	+1.3	-28.0	47%	Penn State (3-3, #73)
33	▲32	Compare	-0.21 #30	.694 #13	1	1	1-2	2	+5.4	-10.7	-12.5	59%	Texas (4-1, #6)
34	▲5	Compare	-0.42 #36	.475 #125	0	0	0-1	0	+32.8	-8.0	—	33%	Central Michigan (3-3, #96)
35	▲26	Compare	-0.45 #38	.700 #9	0	1	2-2	1	+4.4	-2.5	-11.0	62%	Pittsburgh (5-1, #30)
36	▼14	Compare	-0.61 #45	.594 #66	0	0	0-0	2	+18.8	—	—	53%	Air Force (4-1, #49)
37	–	Compare	-0.31 #33	.489 #122	0	0	2-1	0	+11.6	+0.7	—	37%	Florida State (3-3, #64)
38	▲7	Compare	-0.03 #24	.598 #64	0	0	0-1	1	+5.5	-24.0	-24.0	41%	South Florida (4-2, #71)
39	▲4	Compare	-0.53 #42	.504 #115	0	0	0-0	0	+15.8	—	-7.0	28%	Delaware (2-3, #105)
40	▲7	Compare	-0.43 #37	.538 #98	0	0	0-0	1	+17.7	—	-18.0	38%	UNLV (4-2, #68)
41	▼1	Compare	-0.28 #32	.637 #39	0	0	2-1	1	+10.6	-1.0	-27.0	50%	Kansas State (3-2, #56)
42	▼6	Compare	-0.66 #46	.635 #40	0	0	2-2	1	+5.4	-2.0	-10.0	50%	Baylor (4-1, #31)
43	▲36	Compare	-0.99 #53	.706 #6	0	1	1-3	1	+12.2	-5.0	-13.0	50%	Florida (4-2, #29)
44	–	Compare	-0.52 #41	.413 #137	0	0	0-1	0	+20.4	-14.0	—	18%	Old Dominion (2-4, #121)
45	▼20	Compare	-0.59 #43	.493 #121	0	0	2-1	0	+19.6	+9.7	—	41%	Illinois (3-3, #81)
46	▲8	Compare	-0.93 #50	.610 #54	0	0	0-2	0	+19.8	-12.0	-12.0	30%	Colorado State (2-3, #94)
47	▲8	Compare	-1.01 #54	.610 #56	0	1	1-2	2	+7.2	0.0	—	48%	Oklahoma (3-2, #33)
48	▲3	Compare	-0.36 #34	.527 #105	0	0	0-1	1	+10.6	-45.0	—	33%	Florida International (3-2, #72)
49	▲3	Compare	-0.69 #47	.503 #117	0	0	0-0	0	+11.4	—	—	27%	Navy (2-3, #89)
50	▲19	Compare	-1.76 #79	.659 #26	0	1	2-3	1	+11.8	+5.0	-3.0	65%	SMU (4-1, #37)
51	▲9	Compare	-0.45 #39	.680 #17	0	0	2-2	1	-6.4	-11.8	-34.5	48%	North Carolina (3-2, #35)
52	▼11	Compare	-1.42 #69	.696 #11	0	0	1-3	1	+10.0	-5.2	-12.0	60%	Georgia State (4-1, #44)
53	▲35	Compare	-1.18 #57	.747 #3	0	0	2-3	1	+0.8	-4.0	-18.3	58%	Minnesota (4-2, #55)
54	▼19	Compare	-1.32 #64	.556 #89	0	0	2-2	0	+17.0	+2.2	—	36%	Boston College (2-3, #92)
55	▼17	Compare	-0.85 #49	.577 #81	0	0	2-2	1	+7.0	-11.0	-25.0	42%	Michigan (3-2, #47)
56	▼14	Compare	-1.30 #62	.578 #77	0	0	0-2	0	+16.4	-12.0	-19.0	28%	Tulane (2-3, #91)
57	▼1	Compare	-1.35 #66	.695 #12	0	0	1-3	0	+8.0	-7.0	-14.0	42%	West Virginia (3-3, #76)
58	▲13	Compare	-0.93 #51	.554 #93	0	0	0-1	1	+13.0	-36.0	-36.0	39%	UNLV (4-2, #68)
59	▼2	Compare	-1.26 #60	.611 #53	0	0	2-3	1	+7.5	-1.0	-20.0	38%	Arizona State (3-2, #75)
60	▲18	Compare	-0.82 #48	.677 #18	0	0	0-2	2	+5.8	-24.0	-31.0	63%	Louisiana (4-2, #61)
61	▼13	Compare	-1.25 #59	.506 #114	0	0	0-1	0	+8.0	-19.0	—	28%	UAB (3-3, #88)
62	▼13	Compare	-1.13 #56	.513 #112	0	0	0-1	0	+8.3	-39.0	-7.0	25%	San José State (3-3, #107)
63	▲13	Compare	-1.23 #58	.542 #96	0	0	0-1	0	+8.3	-1.0	-25.0	33%	Buffalo (3-3, #102)
64	▼18	Compare	-1.44 #70	.611 #52	0	0	1-3	1	+5.7	-2.5	-14.0	50%	Virginia (4-2, #69)
65	▲10	Compare	-1.30 #61	.450 #130	0	0	0-1	0	+4.0	-10.0	-10.0	20%	Sam Houston (1-4, #122)
66	▲11	Compare	-1.31 #63	.503 #118	0	0	0-1	1	+4.3	-24.0	-24.0	33%	Ohio (4-2, #67)
67	▲16	Compare	-1.34 #65	.607 #59	0	0	0-1	1	+2.8	-28.0	-28.0	50%	Jacksonville State (4-2, #74)
68	▲24	Compare	-1.37 #67	.565 #87	0	0	1-0	1	+2.2	+8.0	—	42%	North Dakota State (5-1, #36)
69	▼2	Compare	-1.45 #71	.523 #106	0	0	2-2	0	+13.7	-3.2	—	43%	NC State (3-3, #87)
70	▲10	Compare	-1.87 #83	.606 #60	0	0	0-3	0	+12.0	-6.7	-7.0	33%	Arkansas State (2-4, #115)
71	▼9	Compare	-1.50 #72	.567 #85	0	0	0-0	2	+8.8	—	—	51%	Florida International (3-2, #72)
72	▲9	Compare	-1.70 #78	.561 #88	0	0	0-0	0	+6.6	—	—	42%	Buffalo (3-3, #102)
73	▼15	Compare	-1.89 #84	.627 #45	0	0	0-3	0	+12.0	-11.0	-21.0	44%	Buffalo (3-3, #102)
74	▲12	Compare	-1.51 #73	.538 #99	0	0	0-0	0	+4.8	—	—	31%	Georgia Southern (2-4, #101)
75	▼2	Compare	-0.97 #52	.503 #116	0	0	1-2	0	+4.8	-19.0	—	28%	Kansas (2-3, #82)
76	▼13	Compare	-2.02 #89	.609 #57	0	1	1-3	1	+3.7	-7.5	-19.0	50%	Virginia (4-2, #69)
77	▲13	Compare	-1.58 #75	.534 #100	0	0	0-0	0	+11.4	—	—	37%	Tulane (2-3, #91)
78	▼25	Compare	-1.56 #74	.431 #133	0	0	0-1	1	+8.6	-10.0	—	30%	East Carolina (3-2, #79)
79	▲12	Compare	-1.05 #55	.532 #101	0	0	0-1	0	+2.2	-38.0	-38.0	25%	Old Dominion (2-4, #121)
80	▼21	Compare	-1.40 #68	.645 #34	0	0	1-3	0	-5.5	-15.2	-29.5	45%	NC State (3-3, #87)
81	▲15	Compare	-1.79 #80	.595 #65	0	0	1-3	0	+4.0	-8.2	-23.0	42%	UAB (3-3, #88)
82	▼8	Compare	-1.81 #81	.638 #37	0	0	0-3	0	+11.8	-13.7	-17.0	40%	Middle Tennessee (2-3, #110)
83	▼19	Compare	-2.03 #90	.565 #86	0	0	0-3	0	+4.0	-8.0	—	25%	Utah State (2-4, #116)
84	▲21	Compare	-2.03 #91	.646 #33	0	0	2-2	1	+1.2	-6.8	-21.0	53%	Virginia Tech (4-2, #54)
85	▲9	Compare	-1.61 #76	.700 #10	0	0	1-3	0	-6.8	-16.2	-28.0	40%	Georgia Tech (2-3, #99)
86	▼36	Compare	-1.68 #77	.428 #135	0	0	0-1	0	+11.5	-10.0	—	28%	San Diego State (2-4, #113)
87	▼19	Compare	-1.89 #85	.604 #62	0	0	1-3	1	+5.3	-12.8	-24.0	55%	Louisville (3-3, #50)
88	▼3	Compare	-2.37 #106	.495 #120	0	0	0-1	0	-3.7	-19.0	—	20%	Navy (2-3, #89)
89	▲14	Compare	-2.56 #110	.569 #83	0	0	0-0	0	+3.6	—	—	50%	Tulsa (3-3, #90)
90	▼18	Compare	-2.22 #96	.518 #109	1	0	1-1	1	+4.2	-7.0	+14.0	50%	Oklahoma State (4-1, #25)
91	▼21	Compare	-2.30 #101	.531 #104	0	0	0-2	1	-4.2	-12.5	—	43%	South Alabama (4-2, #66)
92	▲3	Compare	-2.24 #98	.581 #76	0	0	1-3	0	-4.4	-7.0	—	20%	Rutgers (1-4, #117)
93	▼4	Compare	-2.14 #95	.572 #82	0	0	0-3	0	+8.8	-6.7	—	50%	UConn (3-3, #112)
94	▲10	Compare	-2.04 #92	.686 #16	0	0	0-1	0	-1.2	-18.0	-18.0	50%	Wyoming (3-3, #106)
95	▼29	Compare	-1.82 #82	.414 #136	0	0	1-0	0	+11.5	+16.0	—	18%	Rutgers (1-4, #117)
96	▼9	Compare	-1.91 #86	.606 #61	0	0	0-1	0	-9.3	-49.0	-49.0	33%	Wyoming (3-3, #106)
97	▲5	Compare	-2.09 #94	.643 #35	0	0	0-1	1	+1.6	-52.0	-52.0	67%	North Texas (4-2, #58)
98	▼1	Compare	-1.95 #87	.686 #15	0	0	0-4	0	-8.3	-23.8	-22.7	50%	Tulsa (3-3, #90)
99	▲16	Compare	-2.35 #102	.577 #80	0	0	1-3	1	+1.4	-6.5	-21.0	80%	Duke (4-1, #45)
100	▼16	Compare	-2.30 #100	.666 #24	0	0	0-4	2	-4.3	-16.0	-17.5	62%	Toledo (4-2, #86)
101	▼2	Compare	-2.98 #117	.633 #41	0	0	0-2	0	+0.3	-14.5	-8.5	33%	Coastal Carolina (2-4, #124)
102	▲17	Compare	-2.46 #108	.555 #90	0	0	0-1	1	-6.0	-42.0	—	67%	Toledo (4-2, #86)
103	▲11	Compare	-2.23 #97	.581 #75	0	0	0-2	1	-1.8	-24.5	—	58%	Massachusetts (4-2, #95)
104	▼6	Compare	-2.08 #93	.674 #19	0	0	0-4	0	-4.7	-28.5	-35.0	50%	UConn (3-3, #112)
105	▲3	Compare	-2.35 #103	.539 #97	0	0	0-2	0	-4.2	-24.0	—	33%	Coastal Carolina (2-4, #124)
106	▲11	Compare	-2.60 #112	.498 #119	0	0	0-0	0	-6.0	—	—	33%	San José State (3-3, #107)
107	▼25	Compare	-2.36 #104	.517 #110	0	0	0-1	1	-2.5	-16.0	—	37%	Eastern Michigan (4-3, #108)
108	▲1	Compare	-2.29 #99	.472 #126	0	0	0-2	1	-2.1	-36.0	—	33%	Massachusetts (4-2, #95)
109	▼16	Compare	-2.36 #105	.483 #124	0	0	0-1	0	-11.7	-45.0	-28.0	30%	Middle Tennessee (2-3, #110)
110	▲2	Compare	-2.37 #107	.465 #127	0	0	0-1	0	-7.2	-55.0	—	40%	Nevada (2-3, #114)
111	▼4	Compare	-1.95 #88	.652 #31	0	0	1-4	0	-25.8	-33.0	-48.0	28%	Georgia Tech (2-3, #99)
112	▲8	Compare	-2.57 #111	.396 #138	0	0	0-2	0	+10.5	-12.5	—	27%	Temple (2-4, #125)
113	▼13	Compare	-2.64 #113	.670 #22	0	0	0-1	0	-12.2	-18.0	-15.5	40%	Texas State (2-3, #97)
114	▲9	Compare	-2.82 #116	.429 #134	0	0	0-0	0	+5.8	—	—	25%	Western Kentucky (2-4, #119)
115	▼14	Compare	-3.24 #123	.507 #113	0	0	0-1	0	-0.7	-24.0	—	20%	Kennesaw State (1-4, #123)
116	▲10	Compare	-2.70 #114	.594 #67	0	0	0-2	1	-9.0	-17.5	-26.0	38%	Troy (3-2, #65)
117	▲7	Compare	-3.08 #119	.631 #43	0	0	0-3	0	-2.2	-15.3	-32.0	—	none
118	▼8	Compare	-3.47 #127	.447 #131	0	0	0-1	0	-2.0	-17.0	—	33%	Western Kentucky (2-4, #119)
119	▲8	Compare	-2.52 #109	.531 #103	0	0	0-2	0	-13.0	-44.0	-44.0	20%	Missouri State (1-4, #126)
120	▼2	Compare	-2.75 #115	.549 #94	0	0	0-2	0	-18.8	-56.5	-56.0	17%	Ball State (1-5, #131)
121	▲8	Compare	-3.11 #121	.622 #48	0	0	0-1	1	-9.3	-23.0	-26.0	60%	App State (3-2, #78)
122	▼11	Compare	-3.09 #120	.612 #51	0	0	0-1	0	-3.4	-35.0	-35.0	—	none
123	▼10	Compare	-3.24 #124	.542 #95	0	0	0-1	0	-0.8	-33.0	-33.0	—	none
124	▲6	Compare	-3.60 #130	.485 #123	0	0	0-1	0	+0.8	-7.0	—	50%	Marshall (3-3, #109)
125	▼19	Compare	-3.38 #126	.517 #111	0	0	0-1	1	-1.5	-18.0	—	67%	South Florida (4-2, #71)
126	▼10	Compare	-3.23 #122	.462 #128	0	0	0-2	0	-10.6	-30.0	—	—	none
127	▼6	Compare	-3.37 #125	.432 #132	0	0	0-1	0	-8.2	-35.0	—	—	none
128	▼3	Compare	-3.64 #131	.637 #38	0	0	0-1	0	-10.5	-52.0	-52.0	—	none
129	▲6	Compare	-3.06 #118	.554 #92	0	0	0-2	0	-13.3	-48.5	-49.0	33%	Miami (OH) (3-3, #103)
130	▼8	Compare	-4.01 #133	.519 #108	0	0	0-3	0	-5.2	-17.0	-10.0	—	none
131	▼3	Compare	-3.57 #129	.583 #74	0	0	0-2	0	-20.7	-42.0	-42.0	—	none
132	▼1	Compare	-3.52 #128	.532 #102	0	0	0-2	0	-23.7	-43.0	—	—	none
133	▲1	Compare	-3.76 #132	.669 #23	0	0	0-2	0	-22.2	-32.5	-25.0	—	none
134	▼2	Compare	-4.24 #134	.569 #84	0	0	0-2	0	-12.5	-28.0	-22.0	—	none
135	▲1	Compare	-4.63 #137	.452 #129	0	0	0-2	0	-9.0	-14.0	—	33%	New Mexico State (2-4, #118)
136	▲1	Compare	-4.31 #135	.584 #72	0	0	0-1	0	-20.6	-49.0	-49.0	—	none
137	▼4	Compare	-4.58 #136	.520 #107	0	0	0-0	0	-13.8	—	—	—	none
138	–	Compare	-4.99 #138	.592 #68	0	0	0-1	0	-26.2	-32.0	-32.0	—	none

Tap a team to see its full game log. Tap a column name to sort.

Wins over good teams count most

Every win is worth more the better the beaten team is right now. Two wins over top-30 teams beat four wins over nobody.

Losses depend on who and how bad

A close loss to a top team costs little. Blowouts and losses to bad teams cost a lot.

Record Strength

Against this exact schedule, how many wins would a typical Top 25 team expect? Record Strength is a team's actual wins minus that number. +1.0 means a full win better than a Top 25 team would likely have done.

Re-checked every week

Opponents' results update every Sunday, so a win can gain or lose value even on a bye week. Road wins count more and home losses cost more. Head-to-head breaks close calls, but only for a team with no more losses than the team it beat.